|
|
| Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty (1218118) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 10 of 11 |
||
|
| (1220134) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:35:35 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:23:20 2014. You're not even Jewish. |
|
|
| (1220135) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:38:37 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:35:35 2014. Are only Jews allowed to object to words being used in a misleading and deceptive manner? |
|
|
| (1220137) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:42:46 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:38:37 2014. What ulterior motive do you have? |
|
|
| (1220139) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:45:48 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 10:26:53 2014. 35-40 years ago. Been an awfully long time since any sentient being could. |
|
|
| (1220140) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:47:38 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:32:05 2014. Why vote for someone you patently disagree with? I would find a third party candidate and vote for them, likeI did in the 08Presidential race. You still gotta sleep at night. |
|
|
| (1220141) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:48:34 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:32:49 2014. Nope. |
|
|
| (1220142) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 11:04:37 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:45:48 2014. You never were, not now, and you never were be> |
|
|
| (1220144) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 11:05:27 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:48:34 2014. Then I'm baffled. |
|
|
| (1220149) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 11:25:54 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:42:46 2014. My direct, not ulterior, motive is that I find that many fundamentalist Christians have co-opted "Christianity" to mean "fundamentalist Christianity." For example, Olog has specifically said that I am not a Christian.This is very similar to their co-opting "Judeo-Christian tradition" to mean "Christian tradition." |
|
|
| (1220150) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 11:29:09 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 11:04:37 2014. Considering you know nothing, that's an invalid statement. |
|
|
| (1220151) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 11:31:28 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:33:28 2014. Because it subordinates Jewish to Christian by turning it into a prefix. Because that's what those who use the term believe: That Judaism is just the prelude to Christianity and someday the recalcitrant Jews will figure that out, or be damned. |
|
|
| (1220152) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 11:32:22 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 10:32:05 2014. That's only because you know that he won't win despite your vote for him. That's called a protest vote. |
|
|
| (1220153) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 11:32:49 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:34:47 2014. What epiphany? |
|
|
| (1220159) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Aug 28 11:38:25 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 11:29:09 2014. Typical Bingbong comeback. Something condesending. |
|
|
| (1220165) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:13 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 11:32:22 2014. Actually, I would rather have Astorino than Cuomo as our governor from 2015 through 2018. |
|
|
| (1220166) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:41 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:47:38 2014. The 3rd party candidates I know of are even worse. |
|
|
| (1220168) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 12:23:00 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 11:29:09 2014. Your false claim about my historical political affiliations is tiring at minimum. You've been told this many times before, yet you persist in posting lies about me. |
|
|
| (1220170) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 12:31:07 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:13 2014. Nope. He'll turn NY into an Ozarks style backwater and we don't need that. |
|
|
| (1220176) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 13:04:06 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 12:23:00 2014. I think you're a liar. |
|
|
| (1220180) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 13:49:37 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 13:04:06 2014. You're the liar. Selkirk and I were together then, he's backed up the story and if you can't face it, tough shit. Stop lying about other people. |
|
|
| (1220184) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 14:19:35 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:13 2014. Really. Why? |
|
|
| (1220186) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 14:20:39 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 13:49:37 2014. And in any case, this is such a stupid thing to lie about that your claims can only reasonably be true. |
|
|
| (1220203) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 28 15:11:19 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 10:25:17 2014. Sure ... put Olog in an early grave by using a diaeresis in American. :) |
|
|
| (1220204) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 28 15:11:50 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 11:31:28 2014. Precisely. :( |
|
|
| (1220206) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 28 15:14:05 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:41 2014. That may be, but at least that's a message that actually carries some weight. If you vote republican, then the dems believe they should be more like them. Vote "off the wall" and the protest gets noticed. |
|
|
| (1220207) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 28 15:14:48 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:13 2014. We're STILL trying to recover from Paturkey. :( |
|
|
| (1220248) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:24:03 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:02:54 2014. Is there ANY subject here that DOESN'T wind up into an assinine debate? |
|
|
| (1220249) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:26:23 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:19:15 2014. If you read my next response, you would have read that I was being sarcastic. Actually, libs, like conservatives, BOTH also do things to restrict our rights and freedoms. They just go about it a different way. |
|
|
| (1220251) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 28 18:30:24 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:24:03 2014. Welcome to subchat ... |
|
|
| (1220252) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:32:43 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:26:23 2014. How's that? Aside from ownng military weapons, the liberals give everyone a much better chance at self-determination than the RWers. |
|
|
| (1220259) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:44:42 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:32:43 2014. The libs also encourage a cradle-to-grave welfare state. THAT'S not a good example of self-determination. I'm not even gonna touch the firearms subject.... |
|
|
| (1220270) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Aug 28 19:15:06 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:44:42 2014. not true |
|
|
| (1220275) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 19:34:22 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 13:49:37 2014. The only thing worse than a democrat, is a former Republican who becomes a democrat. |
|
|
| (1220280) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:50:03 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:44:42 2014. No, they do not. As the RW never properly funded the most necessary ingredient for a successful single parent....childcare that is accessible and affordable, the welfare system became cradle to middleage. The Hyde amendment didn't help things either. |
|
|
| (1220282) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:52:02 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 19:34:22 2014. I'm not a member of the Democratic party. |
|
|
| (1220283) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 19:56:07 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:52:02 2014. And I am not a member of the Republican party. |
|
|
| (1220291) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:16:37 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:50:03 2014. It's not the government's responsibility to provide childcare for single parents. Churches or other social organizations should be doing that. I agree with you on the Hyde amendment. |
|
|
| (1220300) | |
Public Servant Wilson WILL avoid being found Guilty. |
|
|
Posted by RockParkMan on Thu Aug 28 21:02:53 2014, in response to How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 24 07:56:30 2014. PIGS always get off. |
|
|
| (1220303) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:10:58 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 19:56:07 2014. Never said you were. |
|
|
| (1220312) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:26:02 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:16:37 2014. It is when they collect from the government to subsist. Having reliable childcare put and keeps single parents working. Working parents earn, the taxpayers save even if they cannot earn enough, a part time working recipient costs less than one who does not work. It is the taxpayer's interest to get as many single parents working and off as much subsidization as possible. They never did that, so the system persisted until the 90s in a stressed manner. |
|
|
| (1220434) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Fri Aug 29 09:51:45 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 11:05:27 2014. You are baffled every day of every year!!!!! |
|
|
| (1222067) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:43:33 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:12:11 2014. Wow. You're projecting your projection onto me. That's metaprojection. |
|
|
| (1222068) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:43:51 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:12:43 2014. Yeah. You wouldn't have noticed. Dunning-Kruger and all that. |
|
|
| (1222069) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:44:26 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 28 08:18:13 2014. OK, back to basics.Define "liberal." Define "conservative." Or shut up. If you keep parading your misunderstanding of these simple terms, I'll keep rubbing your face in your inability to accurately define them. |
|
|
| (1222070) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:47:12 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 09:22:55 2014. But you are right that for every such Nilet post there are many Olog posts that are equally illustrative.If you meant "illustrative" in the sense of merely demonstrating the mindset and attributes of the person who made it, then I'd say we're equal— nearly every post I make reveals that I'm a bit unconventional but perfectly reasonable, while nearly every post Olog makes reveals that he's psychotic. If you meant "illustrative" in the sense of demonstrating craziness, then I doubt you'd find a single post of that nature on my part. |
|
|
| (1222073) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:54:40 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 09:26:25 2014. Oh come on, even the most moderate left-leaner can see that Obama's on the far right.He supports bank bailouts, he supports blanket surveillance and the de facto repeal of the 4th Amendment, he supports pointless wars, he supports torture, he opposes freedom of the press, he vindictively persecutes whistleblowers, he opposes economic stimulus and fair taxation, and he opposes health care reform— the Affordable Care Act isn't real reform, and although Obama's name is often attached to it, Obama himself did everything he could to water it down to nothing. Sure, plenty of low information voters believe Obama is liberal because the right wing noise machine has been blanketing the airwaves with nonstop propaganda claiming exactly that— if everyone were forced to learn exactly what liberalism and conservatism entail, the science and history that support or oppose each one, and make a rational decision uninfluenced by propaganda and tribalistic pressure and socially ingrained bigotry, then 99% of people would be liberal, so the right wing can only survive by confusing people about what they believe, what the left believes, and who falls where on the continuum. |
|
|
| (1222080) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 19:58:01 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by TerrApin Station on Thu Aug 28 08:40:58 2014. That's numberwang! |
|
|
| (1222083) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:00:22 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:04:03 2014. You're baffled a lot. |
|
|
| (1222085) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:01:02 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Aug 28 10:03:35 2014. Aw, playing parrot now?You don't actually understand what we say, but you can be trained to repeat it (in a slightly modified form). |
|
|
| (1222086) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:02:55 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:41 2014. Is Zephyr Teachout that bad? |
|
|
|
Page 10 of 11 |
||