|
|
| Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty (1218118) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 11 of 11 |
||
|
| (1222087) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:03:32 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 12:19:13 2014. A Republican vs. a DINO is hardly much of a comparison. |
|
|
| (1222090) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:09:59 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 07:57:25 2014. READ the things I write!!I did, and I responded to them. That you're incapable of following simple logic isn't my fault. Would have made NO difference in my eyes if Mike Brown was white. Actually, I've provided significant evidence that this statement is false. Rather than try to rebut that evidence, you've simply denied that the very concept of logic exists in order to dodge it. "Logic"?? Again, you are basing this "reading my mind"!! YOU are just assuming. No, I'm basing it on deductive reasoning. When a white man killed a black man, you said that we shouldn't leap to judgement, it might have been justified, we should wait until all the facts come out, and quoted some outright lies in an effort to prove said white man's innocence. When a black man is the (accused) killer, you immediately label him a savage. Ergo, you believe that the colour of a person's skin determines whether the default position should be to assume their actions are justified or murder. |
|
|
| (1222091) | |
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 20:12:51 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:10:50 2014. You didn't actually read any of them, did you?Or maybe you did, but your well-demonstrated inability to understand simple logic precludes you from understanding them. Bless your soul. |
|
|
| (1242979) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 00:05:00 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 25 13:45:13 2014. You may now say "I told you so."A white grand jury has formally declared that murdering black people is not a crime. Looks like you were right and the usual contingent of nuts were WA. Not that any of them are intelligent enough to understand that, of course. |
|
|
| (1242984) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by rkba on Wed Nov 26 01:21:21 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 00:05:00 2014. all they did was conclude that there wasn't enough evidence for an indictment. why are you too dumb to understand that? |
|
|
| (1242988) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 01:30:07 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by rkba on Wed Nov 26 01:21:21 2014. Aw, rkba is cranky. Looks like it's time for bed, rkba. |
|
|
| (1242990) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 01:42:46 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 00:05:00 2014. Killing ANYONE is not a crime so long as there is justification for it. As there was in this case. |
|
|
| (1242991) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:04:27 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 01:42:46 2014. Yes, the "justification" being the fact that he was black.Remember, this was a grand jury. Their job was to determine if it was even possible that a crime might have occurred. Since Wilson confessed to shooting Brown, it's self-evident that there's enough evidence for an indictment. Whether Wilson had some justification for the shooting is a defense at trial. However, the grand jury believed that shooting black people is always legal, regardless of circumstances. As such, they refused to indict— since the victim was black, there is absolutely no possibility it could have been illegal to kill him. That said, there's no point in trying to have an intelligent debate with you. As you have previously demonstrated, you lack the intelligence and/or maturity to understand the basic precepts of logic. As such, this discussion is over and it is way past your bedtime. |
|
|
| (1242992) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:05:33 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:04:27 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1242993) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:06:03 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 01:30:07 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1242995) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:07:51 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by rkba on Wed Nov 26 01:21:21 2014. zzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
|
| (1242997) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:09:22 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 00:05:00 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1243002) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:26:02 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:07:51 2014. You know rkba is on Stormfront, right? I hope that "zzzzzzz" is the sound of the chainsaw you're taking to his internet connection, because he's in dire need of a good long turn in the Time Out Chair. |
|
|
| (1243003) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:27:36 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:26:02 2014. thank you Nilet for the information and linksIAWTP |
|
|
| (1243035) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:47:10 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:04:27 2014. Do you REALLY think that the GJ is that stupid and ignorant to believe in such nonsense? And you can try to deflect me ALL you want with the constant bedtime references but I'm STILL correct. |
|
|
| (1243036) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:48:30 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 26 02:05:33 2014. Of COURSE you do! He makes no sense whatsoever. At least side with someone who has half-a-brain on this site.... |
|
|
| (1243040) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:51:55 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:47:10 2014. Do you REALLY think that the GJ is that stupid and ignorant to believe in such nonsense?Yes. You certainly are. And you can try to deflect me ALL you want with the constant bedtime references but I'm STILL correct. Aw, that's so cute! He thinks he's a grown-up! Now go to bed. |
|
|
| (1243041) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:53:04 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:48:30 2014. Ah, we actually agree on something! Bill has only half a brain.Obviously none of that half is the frontal lobe, because your higher functions are clearly offline. |
|
|
| (1243044) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:54:57 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:51:55 2014. Grasping at straws? I TOLD you I'm at work doing grownup stuff...I wasn't in the GJ so that makes no sense.. |
|
|
| (1243045) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:55:42 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:53:04 2014. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! That was a GOOD one!!!*slaps knee, then your mother for giving birth to you* |
|
|
| (1243047) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:56:26 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:54:57 2014. Sure you are. *pat* *pat*Now go to bed. You have school tomorrow. |
|
|
| (1243059) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 04:07:49 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 03:56:26 2014. Are you jerking off to me?Yeah. That MUST be it....School..... |
|
|
| (1243071) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:16:24 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 04:07:49 2014. Save the childish taunts for the playground and go to bed. |
|
|
| (1243113) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Nov 26 07:24:23 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:04:27 2014. Holy shit, you are fucked up in the head! I never thought in a million years that an intelligent person such as yourself could have the opinion you just expressed. I hope you are being facetious as part of some sick joke on Salaam. |
|
|
| (1243117) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 07:35:42 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Nov 26 07:24:23 2014. You obviously misunderstood my post. Try rereading it and maybe you'll understand. |
|
|
| (1243125) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:52:41 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:16:24 2014. Butthurt much? |
|
|
| (1243134) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:11:46 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:52:41 2014. You have school soon. You'd better get ready. |
|
|
| (1243156) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Nov 26 08:47:47 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 07:35:42 2014. No, I don't think so. But I'll defend your right to express your incorrect opinion. |
|
|
| (1243173) | |
Re: Dear Salaam, |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Nov 26 10:00:38 2014, in response to Re: Dear Salaam,, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 03:54:57 2014. Why are you arguing with him. You already know Nilet is an asshole troll. Just ignore. |
|
|
|
Page 11 of 11 |
||