|
|
| Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic) (467333) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic) |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Jul 27 23:11:02 2007, in response to Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic), posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jul 27 20:32:06 2007. That convinces me that he appears to have been a racist when it came to the pools, but it doesn't convince me about the playgrounds.It;s all the way the aurthor spins it. Why would you add more parks to neighborhoods that already have a lot of parks? The areas with a light sprinkling of dots were the outlying areas not needing parks (understandable) and the heavily congested areas with tenements. What Caro doesn't mention is the availability of land in those congested areas. Maybe building in those areas would first require demolition, while the other parks were built on vacant land, making it not possible to build more parks in congested areas without incurring huge expenses. /////You would have to look at the complete record to come to a definite conclusion either way. Thank you, at least someone can read and understand that there can be a little spin. |
|
|
|