|
|
| Re: Raritan Valley Coalition pushing for direct NJT RVL service to New York using ALP-45DPs (1221704) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Raritan Valley Coalition pushing for direct NJT RVL service to New York using ALP-45DPs |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun May 12 14:37:59 2013, in response to Re: Raritan Valley Coalition pushing for direct NJT RVL service to New York using ALP-45DPs, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun May 12 14:21:52 2013. There was an exhaustive study done of all this a few years ago. I have the CD. Washington Secondary was even less justifiable.When western drivers on I-78 Jersey hit I-287, half goes north half goes south, about 8% each. And most of them work along I-287 in office parks. No critical mass to justify rail service on the Washington Secondary. It also has zero sidings for the entire length. Washington has no public transit, and its population is not like P-Burg. Hampton, Bloomsbury and Glen Gardner are just wide spots on the road. They drive and create a linear parking lot down Route 31 toward Clinton and do whatever: get on Trans Bridge, or more likely, drive to their office park. |
|
|
|