|
|
| Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show (972835) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (973121) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:07:39 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 09:48:33 2012. Not Photo ID. You can open a bank account with a birth certificate. You can then use a debit card for purchases, they don't have a photo on them (rare exceptions, still not legal ID). If you don't drive, you can get along without. One can apply for government services with a birth certificate, utility bill (they don't require ID either) or Social Security card (no photo).It can be done, even in this day and age. |
|
|
| (973128) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:14:25 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:03:55 2012. When you tell someone to sit out the conversation, you're saying STFU aka censoring the conversation.You're also very partisan, Chris so please don't act like it's all one sided. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (973133) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Aug 13 10:16:29 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:14:25 2012. +1 |
|
|
| (973135) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:18:01 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:07:17 2012. There's calling a guy a dick or a douche or a cunt even, and there's going deeper and saying something really mean spirited. I won't go to the latter but the former is part of the kind of ballbusting I grew up with.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (973136) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:18:54 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:07:39 2012. So then they have ID. If they are carrying around their birth certificate with them to open a "bank account", etc, and are too lazy to take that offical document in order to get the free ID suggested, then they can carry around that birth certificate and come and vote with it. (Although it would be foolish on their part). |
|
|
| (973138) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Aug 13 10:20:02 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:18:01 2012. Some Folks can dish it but can't take it... |
|
|
| (973139) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:20:15 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:18:01 2012. I don't disagree. Have you seen what RockPark man calls me sometimes? I just throw it right back. It's become sort of a joke at this point. |
|
|
| (973141) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:21:01 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:20:15 2012. I'm not sure what to say about him LOLyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (973142) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:21:07 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Sun Aug 12 23:19:42 2012. does this SOMEONE as you stated have a name ? name him / heryou still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973145) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:22:20 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:14:25 2012. I am only "partisan" to those that throw the partisan shit to me. I don't do that to other people here.In real life I could actually give two shits actually about politics. I am a LOT less "of the right" in real life than my persona here may show. |
|
|
| (973146) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:22:31 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:18:01 2012. That kind of thing is ok when you actually know and understand the people participating and their motivations, but doesn't transfer to forums very well. Gotta be mindful of that. |
|
|
| (973151) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:26:58 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:22:31 2012. This is true. I would beg to assume that most of us would probably get along REALLY good in person. (I certainly have for just about all the people I met from here) The online written word lacks emotion, so I think people take things way too seriously, and that goes for everyone. |
|
|
| (973152) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:27:19 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:22:20 2012. I hear ya, I get caught up in it a lot more here than in offline life.My opinion is that same every 4 years in that "what really sucks is that one of those assholes is going to be President" your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (973153) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Mon Aug 13 10:27:19 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 13 08:31:40 2012. I did miss that, thanks.It's still not clear to me. If hypothetically Indiana provides ID for free, but charges for drivers licenses, would people be able to use a paid government ID as voter identification? |
|
|
| (973154) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:28:11 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:21:01 2012. It's funny, because he can say the most vile and nasty things, and it never even raises the slightest response. Most of the time, I just laugh, as I know what he's doing. |
|
|
| (973156) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Aug 13 10:28:50 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:26:58 2012. FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!! |
|
|
| (973157) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Aug 13 10:29:30 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:28:11 2012. RockParkMan is awesome. |
|
|
| (973158) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:30:10 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Fred G on Mon Aug 13 10:27:19 2012. And the crap is the same no matter who is president. It sucks with either party. They may do different things to make it suck, but they ALL do suck. Truthfully, I really can't stand either party, or most politicians. I just sort of vote for my opinion of the lesser of two evils in most cases. |
|
|
| (973159) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 13 10:31:13 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:30:10 2012. You've never seen conservatives use the phrase "GOP-e" in reference to liberal Republicans . . . ? ("e" meaning "establishment") |
|
|
| (973160) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:31:28 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by SMAZ on Mon Aug 13 10:28:50 2012. No FUCK you!!!!! |
|
|
| (973161) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:31:39 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:18:54 2012. There is no "free ID suggested". You're talking about something that does not exist. A birth certificate is NOT acceptable as photo ID. Doesn't have a photo, and even if it did they would be kinda useless by the time one reached voting age. |
|
|
| (973163) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Aug 13 10:31:50 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:31:28 2012. haha! |
|
|
| (973165) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:33:44 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:21:07 2012. Here's the post you made on June 5, 2012Click here! |
|
|
| (973166) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:34:22 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:31:39 2012. There is no "free ID suggested". You're talking about something that does not exist.The SUGGESTION was just that, a suggestion that there be such a thing. Are you that ignorant to understand when someone is presenting an Idea? Who said it does exist? The suggestion was that it SHOULD exist, for free, for people on the OFF chance they don't have any other sort of ID. You are the one that brought up birth certificates. |
|
|
| (973170) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:39:51 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:33:44 2012. you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973176) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:44:40 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:34:22 2012. No, I only stated that on the basis of your style here. When someone states that I lied on the basis of an event which had not happened at the time I made my statement (and it had NOT) they are going to be treated as literally as they throw. So FO, asshole.That example was to illustrate how someone can function without having a photo ID. It can be done. Lots of people do it. If one doesn't drive there's little sense in paying DMV for an ID. |
|
|
| (973178) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:49:17 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:39:51 2012. He told me so and you told him! |
|
|
| (973180) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:51:16 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:49:17 2012. i told him what??you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973181) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:52:09 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:51:16 2012. That you were in prison and that you had a bad experience in there and thats why you are against gay marraige now! |
|
|
| (973182) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:52:41 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:49:17 2012. i did not tello nobody i was arrested and whent to jail or prisonyou made that up again what was his name ? does he post here ?? you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973183) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:52:49 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:49:17 2012. i did not tell nobody i was arrested and whent to jail or prisonyou made that up again what was his name ? does he post here ?? you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973186) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:55:10 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:52:41 2012. again! |
|
|
| (973187) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:55:56 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 10:52:49 2012. You lied to your friend that you sent to my job!??Why would you make a story like that up? Just because you hate gay marraige so much!! Very sad........ |
|
|
| (973199) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:01:30 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:44:40 2012. When someone states that I lied on the basis of an event which had not happened at the time I made my statement (and it had NOT) they are going to be treated as literally as they throw.You LIED about the paint and claimed it was removable paint, thus not vandalism. YOu also said based on the fact that he wasn't arrested, it was art, not vandalism. People said that it didn't matter if he was arrested or not, that it was VANDALISM. NO ONE claimed you "lied" that he wasn't arrested, just that it was absurd to say it wasn't vandalism just because it was. Who claimed you lied about him being arrested or not? So, YES, you DID lie about the paint. No one ever claimed you lied about him being arrested, no one claimed he was arrested at the time. People only claimed you were wrong about it being "vandalism" based on his arrest status. So don't try and twist what was said, something you do all the time to avoid responsibility for things you said. So FO, asshole. REAL mature!! Does that make you feel better. Whooohoo! That example was to illustrate how someone can function without having a photo ID. It can be done. Lots of people do it. If one doesn't drive there's little sense in paying DMV for an ID No one said they couldn't function. Twist as usual!! What was said, that in the rarer cases where people don't have it (again, most do), there should be some sort of free ID they can get. No one said there was already, and it was just a suggestion and an idea. It was said in reference to a state requiring ID to vote. It CAN be done free of charge for the rare few that don't have an ID. |
|
|
| (973201) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 11:03:10 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 10:55:56 2012. i sent who to your job ? when ? dates and times please ............did he say i sent him to your job ?? you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973202) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:03:24 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:01:30 2012. Oh, and by the way, is it now "vandalism" instead of "art" because he had been arrested? Just saying....seeing that was such a big part of your spin to call it "art" instead of the vandalism it should have been called. |
|
|
| (973204) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 11:04:10 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:01:30 2012. You did.You also said one needs photo ID "for everything". That is not true, as you now see. |
|
|
| (973206) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 11:04:45 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 11:03:10 2012. AGAIN! |
|
|
| (973211) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 13 11:07:23 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 09:48:33 2012. Most people HAVE IDHuh? The requirement is for a government issued photo ID. What's that going to be other than a driver's license or passport, except in a state that agressively pushes an alternate ID? Tens of millions of people have neither. |
|
|
| (973213) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 11:07:46 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 11:04:45 2012. you still refuse to proiduce proof i was ever arrested , in prison or jail !!!!!you still have refused to answer the question ... do you have proof i was arrested and sent to jail? where and when ? proof proff |
|
|
| (973218) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Mon Aug 13 11:10:00 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 13 11:07:46 2012. You told Hugh Christoper Henry and he told me, thats my proof!Did you lie to him and if so why? |
|
|
| (973227) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:16:14 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 11:04:10 2012. No, I never claimed he "wasn't arrested" when you claimed "it's art because he wasn't arrested". I did however say it's vandalism whether he was arrested or not (you claimed only if he was arrested). So....no, no one claimed you LIED about him being arrested.And in turn he eventually was arrested, so does this mean it's no longer art, and all of a sudden vandalism, after all, that was your claim. And No, I didn't say that "one needs photo ID for everything", I did however say "One needs ID for just about everything". You twisted words, as usual, but that's typical of a fanatical leftist such as yourself. |
|
|
| (973246) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Aug 13 11:22:55 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 11:04:10 2012. He wrote just about everything. Read the OP and you can see it clearly. And while one can live a photo-ID free life, it isn't nearly as easy to prove your identity using birth certificates and utility bills as it is to use a photo ID. |
|
|
| (973261) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:30:07 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Aug 13 11:22:55 2012. He wrote just about everything.Correct, that's what I wrote, and I also never mentioned "photo ID" either. She just wants to twist so she can play disagreement. It's come to the point where partisan people such as she have to disagree with people on the other side of political thought, simply because they could never agree with anything the opposition says....ever. Even to the lengths of making nonsense up or spinning words. |
|
|
| (973272) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Aug 13 11:35:58 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:30:07 2012. I'm well aware of what she does. I might not agree with you on some matters but I'm going to counter the arguments you actually make, not the ones I want you to make. I think it is fair to say I'm politically left of center but extremists do my (and supposedly their own) cause no favors. |
|
|
| (973344) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 12:07:48 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:16:14 2012. http://www.subchat.com/otchat/read.asp?Id=973044You state quite clearly that I lied about his not being arrested. Fact is he was arrested ONE WEEK after I made my statement. You twisted the TRUTH. That's quite different than the typical discussion that goes on here. YOU LIIED. |
|
|
| (973367) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 13 12:33:10 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 10:28:11 2012. It's funny, because he can say the most vile and nasty things RockParkMan is apparently/seemingly good friends with Train Dude. |
|
|
| (973372) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 13 12:41:41 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:44:40 2012. No, I only stated that on the basis of your style here. When someone states that I lied on the basis of an event which had not happened at the time I made my statement (and it had NOT) Way to miss the point. The point is not that the event hadn't happened yet. The point is that many of us knew the event eventually WOULD happen because it obviously made no sense that it had not yet happened. On this basis, combined with the fact that what he did was graffiti and that he admitted to it, it was very clear to many of us that it was vandalism and that he was a vandal. YOU, OTOH, refused to acknowledge any of this perfectly sound logic (and you even went so far as to make up a ridiculously dumb bull**** reason for why it wasn't graffiti/vandalism and therefor why he wasn't arrested). You refuse to debate honestly. You refuse to admit when you are wrong. You refuse to acknowledge that some people here might be smarter than you, and/or you might not be as smart as the average person. And that no matter the case, if several intelligent people are telling you the same thing, i.e. that you are wrong, you should wise up and actually listen to them because then it might not make you seem as dumb as your posts make you seem. |
|
|
| (973384) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 13:27:43 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 12:07:48 2012. What about when you LIED about the tempera paint? You didn't twist the truth? Actually, there was no truth there to be twisted.And is it "art" or Vandalism? YOu stated it was "art" because no one was arrested originally, and that it was "art" because they were able to remove (actually paint over) it in an hour, thus, "not vandalism". |
|
|
| (973387) | |
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 13:39:16 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 13 12:41:41 2012. I wouldn't have even made an issue out of this if she hadn't made up and ran with that nonsensical "removable paint" absurdity. Her whole argument was based on a lie that he used some "tempera" paint and it could be washed off. Some even made the mistake of believing her blantant lie! Then when it was shown that they painted over the vandalism (if it was removable paint they could have just scrubbed), she still held onto that lie even when asked for proof when people began to suspect she was making it up. Then when shown she actually did make it up, ran away from the thread, ignoring it that she had blatantly tried to put one over on people.As for the "art" vs vandalism thing meaning it was "art" because the guy wasn't arrested, at least that can be said to be an opinion. But the fact that she made up parts of the story (tempera paint), and when called on it still didn't apologize, that's the basis for this. It shows the lengths she would go to to try and disagree with people she doesn't agree on other issues with. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||