|
|
| Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show (973227) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Aug 13 11:16:14 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 11:04:10 2012. No, I never claimed he "wasn't arrested" when you claimed "it's art because he wasn't arrested". I did however say it's vandalism whether he was arrested or not (you claimed only if he was arrested). So....no, no one claimed you LIED about him being arrested.And in turn he eventually was arrested, so does this mean it's no longer art, and all of a sudden vandalism, after all, that was your claim. And No, I didn't say that "one needs photo ID for everything", I did however say "One needs ID for just about everything". You twisted words, as usual, but that's typical of a fanatical leftist such as yourself. |
|
|
|