|
|
| Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show (973372) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 13 12:41:41 2012, in response to Re: Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 13 10:44:40 2012. No, I only stated that on the basis of your style here. When someone states that I lied on the basis of an event which had not happened at the time I made my statement (and it had NOT) Way to miss the point. The point is not that the event hadn't happened yet. The point is that many of us knew the event eventually WOULD happen because it obviously made no sense that it had not yet happened. On this basis, combined with the fact that what he did was graffiti and that he admitted to it, it was very clear to many of us that it was vandalism and that he was a vandal. YOU, OTOH, refused to acknowledge any of this perfectly sound logic (and you even went so far as to make up a ridiculously dumb bull**** reason for why it wasn't graffiti/vandalism and therefor why he wasn't arrested). You refuse to debate honestly. You refuse to admit when you are wrong. You refuse to acknowledge that some people here might be smarter than you, and/or you might not be as smart as the average person. And that no matter the case, if several intelligent people are telling you the same thing, i.e. that you are wrong, you should wise up and actually listen to them because then it might not make you seem as dumb as your posts make you seem. |
|
|
|