|
|
| "War on women" blows up in Democrats faces (930529) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |
|
|
| (930529) | |
"War on women" blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:24:30 2012 Remember the name "Hilary Rosen" because she will be in the news a LOT starting tomorrow:The shitstorm on Twitter right now as a result of this is about a category 5.  |
|
|
| (930531) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 12 00:29:54 2012, in response to "War on women" blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:24:30 2012. There was never a war on women.As for what was said about Mitt's wife...spouses should be off-limits unless they make statements first. I expect that Hilary Rosen will be dismissed before the week is out. |
|
|
| (930532) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:30:55 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 12 00:29:54 2012. Twitter is a lot of fun right now. |
|
|
| (930534) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:38:30 2012, in response to "War on women" blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:24:30 2012. zzzzzzzzzzz...your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930535) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 12 00:40:34 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:30:55 2012. BTW, re-reading it on DC, I wonder if it's going to be an over-reaction by the right. The comments were wrong, but people tend to over-react to even minor slip-ups. |
|
|
| (930536) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 12 00:44:55 2012, in response to "War on women" blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:24:30 2012. Maybe they should not have waged a war on women. But leftists can't help themselves; they're blinded by ideology. |
|
|
| (930537) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:45:50 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 12 00:44:55 2012. LOL!!your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930539) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:50:52 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 12 00:40:34 2012. The thing is, this is just another cheesy attack to smokescreen the mysogyny of the right.Chris is trying to shoot down a B-52 with a peashooter your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930583) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 08:54:55 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:38:30 2012. You don't understand. When a right wing blogger says something that isn't very defensible, it's just one blogger and by no means representative of the candidate. However, when a left wing blogger puts their foot into their mouth, ... |
|
|
| (930613) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Apr 12 10:30:33 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 12 00:29:54 2012. seldouche says there is a war on women. I agree but its the obamites who are using women to wage a nonsensical war against the Conservatives. |
|
|
| (930627) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 11:28:06 2012, in response to "War on women" blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 00:24:30 2012. She's right. Ann Rmoney has never worked in an actual job a single day of her life. Hubby Willard can't ask women himself? He has to ask her? Women are voters. He should be connecting directly instead of pretending there's some sort of veil...where he has to send his wife out to find what women want.He clearly does NOT believe in equality.The war on Women has to do with specific issues related to healthcare access for contraceptives, which are necessary for women to fully participate economically. I do appreciate seeing this,it's a different, spot on perspective on Rmoney. Thanks, Chris. You have no idea how this further damages the presumptive nominee. |
|
|
| (930633) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 11:48:35 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:38:30 2012. Oh, c'mon. When an Obama adviser attacks a woman who stayed home to raise 5 kids and is suffering from MS and is a cancer survivor, you can at least take an interest in the breathtaking stupidity of such a move.Romney is enjoying the full support of even the most skeptical conservative because of this. It's quite an achievement. |
|
|
| (930638) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:07:40 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 11:48:35 2012. Oh, c'mon. When an Obama adviser attacks a woman who stayed home to raise 5 kids and is suffering from MS and is a cancer survivor, you can at least take an interest in the breathtaking stupidity of such a move.The Democrats and Obama have become desperate. That desperation will get even worse as the Republicans unite behind one candidate now that the primaries are basically over in all but formality. |
|
|
| (930641) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:09:26 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 11:28:06 2012. LMAO!!!!!Thank YOU for also jumping the gun early. It's people like you that were able to make the Republicans get rid of Santorum because you couldn't hold it in. A big THANK you! |
|
|
| (930643) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:11:18 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 00:50:52 2012. ...While Ms Rosen called it right out. She won't be fired for this. It's another perspective on Rmoney. |
|
|
| (930645) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:13:17 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:07:40 2012. I don't think I've seen a Democratic political adviser do something this stupid. A reminder that it's not the GOP alone which can "blow" this election. |
|
|
| (930646) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:15:26 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:09:26 2012. ???That's an interesting theory. You are saying that Romney voters in IL and WI voted that way not because of Romney's ads, or because of coverage of Santorum in mainstream media, but because of left wing bloggers, etc. |
|
|
| (930647) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:15:27 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:13:17 2012. Obama's biggest problem right now is that he thinks it's 2008 and that he is invincible. |
|
|
| (930648) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:17:54 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:15:26 2012. The mainstream media, as well as the leftists have made Santorum out to be a total kook who will not be electable against Obama. It worked, and the more moderate candidate remains. |
|
|
| (930649) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:20:46 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:17:54 2012. Mainstream media, sure. They highlighted things like Santorum saying JFK's actions made him feel sick. Great way to move the Catholic vote over to Romney. But what did the left wing have to do with it? |
|
|
| (930650) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:23:37 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:13:17 2012. Very foolish on her part. About on par with etch-a-sketch.Very wise of the White House to distance themselves. It's Ann Romney's willingness to take care of the home front that made Mitt's career possible. |
|
|
| (930651) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:23:38 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:20:46 2012. The left wing? LOL!!! Just take the small sample of leftists here like bingbong spouting off her mouth about him. She sounded like all the leftist blogs too.Whether I liked Santorum or not, I wouldn't have voted for him, as the perception certainly was that he would have a tougher time against Obama. I thank people like bingbong for helping get rid of him. |
|
|
| (930652) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:24:38 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:09:26 2012. How exactly? The republicans started the War on Women when they freaked out about contraceptive access in February. Then Sanitorium started up about overturning Griswold, et.al. and revealed where the republicans really stand. Rmoney said then he would sign that bill if it came to him.That's where the gender gap came from, and there's video footage to ensure it won't go away. Ms Rosen added anew perspective about Rmoney and she's right...by using his wife he's indicating that he has no interest in talking with women himself, directly. Does he think women are Unequal?Inferior?...He's the candidate, he should be out there talking with women directly. Gotta ask why. |
|
|
| (930653) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:25:24 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:23:37 2012. YEs, well said. |
|
|
| (930654) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 12 12:26:59 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:23:38 2012. That sounds like you might have voted for Sanatorium if he had a chance to win. You are no moderate. |
|
|
| (930655) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:27:10 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:07:40 2012. She didn't attack her. You obviously didn't listen. She said HE is USING her so he can avoid direct conflict with women voters and she speculated as to WHY. Her point is very very valid. |
|
|
| (930656) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:27:47 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:15:27 2012. I'm not so sure. I think the Obama campaign lives in a cocoon where they think they can get away with anything because Obama's agenda is so important to the nation. Pure "ends justifying means" mentality. It explains why they went off on Rush Limbaugh for his Fluke comments, but felt secure in trashing conservative women. I think many are genuinely shocked that this blew up so strongly. To them, Democrats should be immune from attacks on their views of women from the right. They support all the right causes, right? |
|
|
| (930661) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:29:50 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 12 12:26:59 2012. I'd have voted for Santorum simply because he would have been the better choice than 4 more years of....this. I would not have done so enthusiastically (shades of 2000).Santorum's right wing social issue stuff was always a sideshow. He couldn't ban porn, he couldn't ban abortions. That pesky Constitution and it's checks and balances .... |
|
|
| (930663) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:31:46 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:24:38 2012. How exactly? The republicans started the War on Women when they freaked out about contraceptive access in February.LOL!! Us rational people knew not to pay attention to the nonsense. Actually, if the GOP didn't want Santorum, they were BRILLIANT to start that and have him spout off now instead of in August. The left, and people like you with youyr overindulgent "fake" outrage, worked like a charm to get the more moderate candidate chose. THank you!! Then Sanitorium started up about overturning Griswold, et.al. and revealed where the republicans really stand. No, the hype you created during the primaries (instead of waiting until August where it would have been devastating) helped get rid of him now, and make it old news. Thank you! That's where the gender gap came from There is no "gender gap". It's a manufactured issue created by the leftists because they can't run on Obama's great achievements, and since they have to point out anything other than this failed pre3sidency, they have tried this angle, as they have nothing else. RUnning on how "bad" the other side is rather than how "good" your side is is a recipe for disaster. |
|
|
| (930667) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:35:04 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 12 12:26:59 2012. No because the whole nonsense was a sideshow. There is no realistic chance all the hype the leftists came up would have a chance of passing anyway. I liked Romney better than Santorum all along, but there was NO way in hell I would be voting for four more years of the current atmosphere, so yes, if Santorum had one, I would still be voting for the lesser of two evils in November, which he would have been for "change". Thankfully, the better candidate prevailed, so it's moot. |
|
|
| (930668) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:35:54 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:27:10 2012. No, it's a complete side show, and a manufactured "outrage". It won't work. |
|
|
| (930669) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:36:50 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:27:47 2012. So long as they keep their invincible mentality through November, I say go for it....it will blow up in their face. |
|
|
| (930670) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:37:21 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 12:27:47 2012. Lardmouth deserved what he is getting (th e$$ drying up) for his thoughtless tasteless hateful comments about Ms Fluke, a private person. That scorn is deserved, and I think much less of anyone that would defend that prick.Fact is, Ann Romney never worked at a job outside the home a day in her life. Ms Rosen should clarify that if anything. Otherwise, her assessment of Rmoney is spot on. |
|
|
| (930672) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Apr 12 12:45:59 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:37:21 2012. hateful comments about Ms Fluke, a private person. Re: Republicans? You're done ... and you can THANK El Drugbo for it. :) (930660) |
|
|
| (930673) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:48:09 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:31:46 2012. There is no fake outrage, it's very very real. Being you aren't a women you'd never comprehend that. Go continue living in your selfish reality. |
|
|
| (930674) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:49:37 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:31:46 2012. BTW, Rmoney is 20 points behind with women voters. If that isn't a gender gap I don't know what is. Women earn 23% less (average) than men. If that isn't a gender gap I don't know what is. |
|
|
| (930675) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:51:44 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:23:38 2012. ???I still don't follow your argument on how bingbong (and similar folks) helped persuade Republican primary voters to vote for Romney rather than santorum. |
|
|
| (930679) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Apr 12 12:57:46 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:49:37 2012. Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces (930672) |
|
|
| (930683) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Apr 12 13:22:32 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Apr 12 12:57:46 2012. Does your wife know you are posting again? |
|
|
| (930687) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 13:26:07 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 12:36:50 2012. It's the same mindset that protects rich liberals from all the 1% stuff. Even those profiting off of it (that would be you, Russell Simmons): |
|
|
| (930688) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 13:26:18 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 12:51:44 2012. We didn't, Santorum did that himself.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930690) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:29:46 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 12:48:09 2012. LOL!!!!!! |
|
|
| (930696) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 13:36:14 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:29:46 2012. She's a talking point bot, Chris. I can predict whatever she will say by reading the lefty talking heads I follow on Twitter the day before she makes a post.It was Obama, for no apparent reason who decided to trash precedent and force Catholic owned businesses to cover birth control. They had Sandra Fluke ready and waiting before he went public. |
|
|
| (930698) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:38:37 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 13:26:18 2012. The Democrats (well the hard leftist ones anyway) proceeded to harp and jump on, and make a huge ordeal out of it. It made Santorum look like a lunatic. If they were smart, they would have saved their ammo for if he was chosen. They let fire their ammo pointing out the more moderate candidate, at a time when Santorum had a good chance of winning the primaries. By making such a huge deal out of issues during a time when it really was none of their concern, helped hugely in getting rid of Sandorum, the far weaker candidate against Obama. Thank you Bing Bong, Smaz & Co!! |
|
|
| (930699) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 13:43:12 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 13:36:14 2012. Sandra Fluke testified before Congress,which operates independent of the Executive branch. As if not learning science isn't enough, now civics is on the RW edumaction block too? |
|
|
| (930700) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 13:43:44 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:38:37 2012. You mean they just let Santorum speak. Americans wouldn't have voted for Santorum as he's too far right on social issues.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930701) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 13:44:32 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 12 13:36:14 2012. It was Obama, for no apparent reason who decided to trash precedent and force Catholic owned businesses to cover birth control.Without precedent? What are the states that have done this? Chopped liver? And furthermore, I'm sure you are aware that there currently is a public comment period in effect, asking for input on regulations. In other words, TEHRE ARE NO REGULATIONS YET. |
|
|
| (930705) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 13:47:10 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:38:37 2012. Once again, I don't follow how the leftist Democrats persuaded Republican primary voters to vote for Romney. |
|
|
| (930706) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 12 13:50:10 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 12 13:44:32 2012. He's just a bot for the right LOLyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (930708) | |
Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 12 13:51:19 2012, in response to Re: ''War on women'' blows up in Democrats faces, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 12 13:38:37 2012. Sanitorium IS a lunatic. He wasn't going to be chosen, period. However, Rmoney said he'd sign onto whatever Sanitorium wanted. Now he's trying to etch-a-sketch his way out of a 20 point gender gap that WILL cost him the election. However,the RW won't have any of that, they're taking the toy away.Don't think for a minute women are going to enmasse suddenly forget about this. It'll all be back come convention time, when they do the platform. Two days after that, the real campaign begins. |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |
|