|
|
| Re: Laws Laws Laws (714942) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
|
| (715424) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:36:02 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:22:45 2011. What argument did I get involved in to lose in the first place?Oh yeah ... right ... competition needy. OK, you win. Feel better now? |
|
|
| (715426) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:37:50 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:30:49 2011. Ummmm ... there's never any requirement out of me to agree to anything. But I'm GOING to say what I think anyway. :) |
|
|
| (715432) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:44:01 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:32:33 2011. People who buy old rundown buildings without fixing them kinda deserve their lossesOld doesn't mean "rundown". And who says they aren't "fixed"? ANd even better, take away the incentive to INVEST in refurbishing housing stock. Yes, that's a great idea, make older buildings unattractive for investment.....depreciate their value so people can't sell them. Then the city can take them over and let the city wollow back into the 70's. As to subsidies for low income people, that's socialism. That's what your party is working to destroy. So THEN what? I am not the one saying there should be "subsidies", but if there are "subsidies", of which Rent Stabilization/Control is, it doesn't belong at the hands of private individuals. |
|
|
| (715433) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:45:06 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:33:54 2011. So you ARE a Texas Republican! |
|
|
| (715435) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:46:17 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:37:50 2011. No one said YOU had to agree, but you assumed because I didn't agree, that I didn't "get it". |
|
|
| (715438) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:47:41 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:45:06 2011. 
|
|
|
| (715439) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:49:10 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:46:17 2011. You did completely dodge my point, so it's fair to ask ... but still ... rent and landlording don't mean squat to me ... |
|
|
| (715441) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:51:52 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 21:49:10 2011. That was in reference to "NY Republicans, RINOs, and RINO Bloomberg" not landlording. |
|
|
| (715442) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jan 4 22:04:23 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:51:52 2011. Mixed threads ... I still think the whole "RINO" thing is stupid. If they're unacceptable, don't put them on the ballot if "purity of essence" is so damned important. I remember when the republican party wasn't so damned insane. |
|
|
| (715460) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:48:26 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 16:04:28 2011. The way some landlords get rid of tenants here in NYC, is to dial 911, and report that said tenant is storing guns, drugs, or explosives in their apartment. The NYPD storms in, locks up the tenant as a possible terrorist and/or drug dealer, and by the time the tenant gets out of Central Booking, the landlord has obtained a restraining order preventing the tenant (as a "suspected" terrorist and/or drug dealer) from moving back in. It ain't really legal OR kosher, but a tenant who can't pay their rent, also can't afford a lawyer to fight this nonsense in court.For landlords, if all else fails, there is ALWAYS a way to get those "troublesome" tenants out. |
|
|
| (715461) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Jan 4 22:50:25 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:48:26 2011. So you think that tenants should be allowed to store drugs and guns? Or are you saying that the NYPD arrests them even when they don't find drugs and guns? |
|
|
| (715462) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 22:51:01 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by Easy on Tue Jan 4 22:50:25 2011. LOL, exactly. |
|
|
| (715467) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:57:41 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by Easy on Tue Jan 4 22:50:25 2011. I've been assigned to jobs where the "severity of the complaint" was enough to warrant an arrest pending further investigation. We were called as a standby unit in case there were actual explosives on the scene. There weren't, but it took ESU and the Bomb Squad all damn night to go through the place...anyone accused of having major-weight drugs, guns, or explosives in NYC will get taken into custody until proven otherwise. The alternative, not arresting a person accused of these things, and later finding out the allegations are true, opens the city up to lawsuits. |
|
|
| (715470) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Jan 4 23:02:51 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:57:41 2011. I wish I had known about this tactic a couple of years ago. My sister-in-law had a tenant that moved into her house and never paid any rent. Due to the tenant knowing how to scam the system and California making it impossible to quickly evict anyone that doesn't want to be evicted she ended up living there for maybe 9 months and never paid rent. My sister-in-law lost her house because of it. I would have called the cops to help her out had I known. |
|
|
| (715480) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 23:10:58 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:57:41 2011. Yes, then the next morning, when they find nothing, then the tenant goes home, back to said apartment, and Landlord still has him.Of explosives are found, well then Landlord did a favor.... |
|
|
| (715481) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 23:11:17 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jan 4 22:57:41 2011. Yes, then the next morning, when they find nothing, then the tenant goes home, back to said apartment, and Landlord still has him.If explosives are found, well then Landlord did a favor.... |
|
|
| (715485) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 23:12:27 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by Easy on Tue Jan 4 23:02:51 2011. At least story B is realistic and rooted in actuality as opposed to Story A you responded to, which is as absurd as it sounds. |
|
|
| (715494) | |
Re: Laws Laws Laws |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Jan 4 23:29:01 2011, in response to Re: Laws Laws Laws, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 4 21:28:24 2011. LOL, Bloomberg's face sez he ain't havin non of that!your pal, Fred |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||