Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 9

Next Page >  

(645768)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:25:23 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:41:18 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No, it sure isn't false.

Post a New Response

(645769)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:24:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Antisemitism now, or just anti-Americanism? Our jurisprudence is founded on Mosaic law.

False. It is founded on common law. There is little correspondence with the Bible and much of what does correspond is coincidental at best.

Post a New Response

(645770)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:26:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:25:23 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Some authority on truth and falsehood who DENIES THE BOSNIAN GENOCIDE.

Post a New Response

(645771)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:28:50 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:37:59 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Both Quakers and Unitarians use the term "meeting houses". Dates from Puritan times, where said house functioned as both house of worship and political town hall. Mormons, Christadelphians, Congregationalists, Mennonites, Amish and even Moonies use the term.

Post a New Response

(645772)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:29:25 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:26:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
How can I deny something that didn't happen and there's no evidence for, eh? No proff.

Post a New Response

(645773)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:31:03 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It is founded on common law

. . . which has its history in Mosaic jurisprudence rather than Roman law.

There is little correspondence with the Bible and much of what does correspond is coincidental at best

Shows unfamiliarity with the Bible. And it's not coincidental.

Post a New Response

(645774)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
This might help you to understand Olog's world a bit better ... presented in chart form for everyone's convenience ...



Post a New Response

(645834)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 07:48:39 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:46:35 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(645837)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:53:32 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:55:36 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So it's alright that they want to bring Islamic Law to the United States. So then why not have Christian extremist law also brought into the United States.

Post a New Response

(645838)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:54:23 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:41:18 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That most definitely is not false.

Post a New Response

(645839)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:56:06 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:52:03 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Correct, as I said in the other post, which you said was false, they hate us because of who we are....we give equal rights to woman, are tolerant of gays, and a whole other list of things. They attacked us for who we are.

Post a New Response

(645842)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:01:44 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
....AND OF COURSE:

Post a New Response

(645843)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:01:50 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
....AND OF COURSE:

Post a New Response

(645844)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:02:15 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
....AND OF COURSE:



Post a New Response

(645847)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:06:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:56:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Why didn't they attack Sweden or Norway?

Post a New Response

(645849)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:10:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:06:54 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Because Sweden or Norway don't represent the "Leader of the West".

Post a New Response

(645851)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:13:10 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:10:55 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Try harder.

Post a New Response

(645856)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:26:17 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:13:10 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They don't. If Norway was off the face of the earth, sadly, it wouldn't be much noticed in the same way as if the US was. If America was off the face of the earth, it most definitely would be noticed.

Post a New Response

(645870)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:10:34 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:49:15 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Nope---still irrelevant. How is it relevant to Americans here?

Post a New Response

(645871)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:12:48 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 3 21:55:48 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You're right: Rachel Corrie caused her own death.

Post a New Response

(645878)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:10:34 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
How is it relevant? When these ISLAMIC fanatics come HERE (which they have) and begin attacking us it is quite relevant.

Post a New Response

(645881)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 09:42:52 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Aug 4 05:16:47 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
A Jew didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Prysbetirian didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Buddist didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Methodist didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Unitarian didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Baptist didn't destroy the World Trade Center.
A Fundamentalist Christian didn't destroy the World Trade Center.

Moslems did destroy the World Trade Center. Moslems the world over should be against the placing of this building near the site. Then again, what can you expect from a group of men who are so so afraid of the women in their population, so unsure of their own masculinity, so afraid of what would happen if they see a female in the flesh that they force the women to hide their femininity.

The Moslems have not earned the right to place this building near the site of their act of war against the United States.

Post a New Response

(645883)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 09:45:22 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The real problem is that it is not just the fanatics that wish us harm. Remember the scene of how the average Palestinian on the West Bank reacted to 9-11?



Post a New Response

(645888)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:01:29 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Aug 3 12:50:58 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You're like, developmentally challenged.

Post a New Response

(645891)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:04:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Those there and those here are not the same. Therefore, it's irrelevant.

Post a New Response

(645892)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:05:25 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 09:45:22 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That's there...not here. Therefore, it's not relevant.

Post a New Response

(645895)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:08:41 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by BMTLines on Tue Aug 3 21:49:18 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I keep hoping to read about secret societies of Moslem women castrating Moslem men as they sleep.

Post a New Response

(645899)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:19:12 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Aug 3 16:14:22 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Tell you what, dude, Let me kick you in the nuts EXTREMELY hard, and then tell you i'm gonna be your friend, like it or not.

Post a New Response

(645902)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 10:25:43 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:05:25 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
How do you know that the Palestinians that emigrated here don't share those same sentiments? Many immgrants come here solely for economic opportunity, not that they share any great love or admiration for this country

Post a New Response

(645905)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 10:32:26 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:04:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Uhm, they came here and attacked us HERE, so yes, it is very much "relevant".

Post a New Response

(645912)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:24:49 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 10:28:29 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
omg, i dislike being so negative, bion, but this AMoreira81 fella is very much a foole. To state that the attack on The World Trade Center was a "local matter"...yeesh. I blame the schools he went to for allowing this genius the right to think he "done bin edjumacated".

Post a New Response

(645913)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:44:32 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Fuck the "world"! The "world" didn't build, ironically, the World Trade Center. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey did. The "world", in this instance, can suck my dick. And they can also shut the fuck up, and mind their own fucking business.

Post a New Response

(645914)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:47:26 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Fuck the "world"! The "world" didn't build, ironically, the World Trade Center. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey did. The "world", in this instance, can suck my dick. And they can also shut the fuck up, and mind their own fucking business.

Post a New Response

(645917)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:53:32 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
And if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11, would it be acceptable for you to see other people hate all Christians for what these 19 animals did? How would you feel if people opposed a church and recreational center built on one of the largest gravesites in America? (Yes, I know that St. Peter's Church is right across Church Street).

Post a New Response

(645918)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:58 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Jeff Rosen on Tue Aug 3 19:11:24 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Exactly.

Post a New Response

(645929)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 11:05:24 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
On 9/11/01, MUSLIM terrorists attacked us. They weren't terrorists who happened to be Muslim, they were MUSLIM extremists who attacked us, and IN THE NAME of Islam.

You have it all twisted and wrong - - these 19 people were PRETENDING to be Muslim - - they were NOT Muslims in any way because the Quran forbids suicide, murder of women and children, and idolarty (pretending to embrace Allah with means of violence as described herein.).

Post a New Response

(645934)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:37:24 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It's not just the 9/11 attackers.

It's the growing threat from Muslim attackers. Maj. Hasan. Underwear bomber. TS bomber. JFK oil line plot.

Muslims are such a small percentage of the population, but they pose a much greater threat than any other religion, race, or ethnic group.

Post a New Response

(645936)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:40:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
And if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11

But they weren't.

Post a New Response

(645941)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 12:54:44 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
But these 19 people did not do this in isolation. They had massive support and resources from Islamic governments as well as many members of the Islamic religious leadership. How many mullahs in Iran and Afghanistan either support or express understanding of this action? A lot more than 19 fanatics are involved here.

Al Quaida itself could not even exist if it did not receive funding and support from official sources.

So if 19 people did this in isolation we blame only the individuals involved. But the attack on the WTC was not an isolated incident - it involved a conspiracy amongst Moslem governments and religious leaders to enable it to happen.

Do we hate all moslems? No. Do we distrust the motives of their leadership? Yes.

Post a New Response

(645952)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:32:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They weren't Christian fanatics and St Peters was already there long before.

Post a New Response

(645954)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:35:33 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:40:55 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"19 people" were not involved in this. They did not act alone. Of course people don't hate all Muslims. "All Muslims" are most definitely not responsible, not even the majority. But the Muslim leadership has not exactly been a trustworthy group. It's up to peaceloving Muslims to deal with the Muslim leadership.

Post a New Response

(645959)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:44:36 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Pretending or not, they were acting on their own twisted version of Islam, and supported through Muslim organizations. You can say all you want that "The Taliban" and all these other Muslim organizations supporting people like this aren't "real" Muslims, it doesn't change the fact that these people did this as Fundamentalist Muslims, in the name of Islam, and it doesn't change the fact that 3000 people are dead.

I can argue similarly that Christian Fundamentalists that blow up abortion clinics "aren't really Christians" either, but that doesn't change the fact that that ere Christian fanatical fundamentalists.

Post a New Response

(645962)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 13:59:17 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11, would it be acceptable for you to see other people hate all Christians for what these 19 animals did?

No need for the "all X/all Y" fallacy. We know that the Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian Caliphate do not represent you.

Post a New Response

(645971)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 14:34:45 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:35:33 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Agreed, and sadly they are not really speaking up against the so-called fake Muslims belonging to the Taliban, Al Queda or any other terrorist organization.

Post a New Response

(645974)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 14:38:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
these 19 people were PRETENDING to be Muslim

We need more Imams saying what you say. I take it you also believe that the Supreme Leader and his Revolutionary Guard over in Iran, as well as all other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, are pretend Muslims too? How about Cat Stevens, who said that Salman Rushdie should die . . . ? We've got whole countries full of "pretend Muslims" then — Libya, Turkey, Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, even Indonesia.

Post a New Response

(645993)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 15:28:46 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 14:34:45 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(646052)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 17:18:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No to mention that all 19 had been out drinking and getting laid the night before.

Post a New Response

(646056)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 17:58:59 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 17:18:55 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
And not to mention that most of the "Muslim" countries out there must be "pretend" Muslim countries...

Post a New Response

(646059)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 18:08:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 17:58:59 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You mean like those "pretend" Catholic countries like America? :)

Post a New Response

(646060)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 18:17:33 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 18:08:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Why do you hate America so much?


Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]

< Previous Page  

Page 5 of 9

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]