Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied (644780) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 5 of 9 |
(645768) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:25:23 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:41:18 2010. No, it sure isn't false. |
|
(645769) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:24:16 2010. Antisemitism now, or just anti-Americanism? Our jurisprudence is founded on Mosaic law.False. It is founded on common law. There is little correspondence with the Bible and much of what does correspond is coincidental at best. |
|
(645770) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:26:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:25:23 2010. Some authority on truth and falsehood who DENIES THE BOSNIAN GENOCIDE. |
|
(645771) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:28:50 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:37:59 2010. Both Quakers and Unitarians use the term "meeting houses". Dates from Puritan times, where said house functioned as both house of worship and political town hall. Mormons, Christadelphians, Congregationalists, Mennonites, Amish and even Moonies use the term. |
|
(645772) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:29:25 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:26:56 2010. How can I deny something that didn't happen and there's no evidence for, eh? No proff. |
|
(645773) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:31:03 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010. It is founded on common law. . . which has its history in Mosaic jurisprudence rather than Roman law. There is little correspondence with the Bible and much of what does correspond is coincidental at best Shows unfamiliarity with the Bible. And it's not coincidental. |
|
(645774) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 03:25:54 2010. This might help you to understand Olog's world a bit better ... presented in chart form for everyone's convenience ... |
|
(645834) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 07:48:39 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:46:35 2010. |
|
(645837) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:53:32 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:55:36 2010. So it's alright that they want to bring Islamic Law to the United States. So then why not have Christian extremist law also brought into the United States. |
|
(645838) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:54:23 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:41:18 2010. That most definitely is not false. |
|
(645839) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:56:06 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:52:03 2010. Correct, as I said in the other post, which you said was false, they hate us because of who we are....we give equal rights to woman, are tolerant of gays, and a whole other list of things. They attacked us for who we are. |
|
(645842) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:01:44 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010. ....AND OF COURSE: |
(645843) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:01:50 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010. ....AND OF COURSE: |
(645844) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Aug 5 08:02:15 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 03:38:11 2010. ....AND OF COURSE: |
|
(645847) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:06:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:56:06 2010. Why didn't they attack Sweden or Norway? |
|
(645849) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:10:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:06:54 2010. Because Sweden or Norway don't represent the "Leader of the West". |
|
(645851) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:13:10 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:10:55 2010. Try harder. |
|
(645856) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 08:26:17 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 5 08:13:10 2010. They don't. If Norway was off the face of the earth, sadly, it wouldn't be much noticed in the same way as if the US was. If America was off the face of the earth, it most definitely would be noticed. |
|
(645870) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:10:34 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:49:15 2010. Nope---still irrelevant. How is it relevant to Americans here? |
|
(645871) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:12:48 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 3 21:55:48 2010. You're right: Rachel Corrie caused her own death. |
|
(645878) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 09:10:34 2010. How is it relevant? When these ISLAMIC fanatics come HERE (which they have) and begin attacking us it is quite relevant. |
|
(645881) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 09:42:52 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Aug 4 05:16:47 2010. A Jew didn't destroy the World Trade Center.A Prysbetirian didn't destroy the World Trade Center. A Buddist didn't destroy the World Trade Center. A Methodist didn't destroy the World Trade Center. A Unitarian didn't destroy the World Trade Center. A Baptist didn't destroy the World Trade Center. A Fundamentalist Christian didn't destroy the World Trade Center. Moslems did destroy the World Trade Center. Moslems the world over should be against the placing of this building near the site. Then again, what can you expect from a group of men who are so so afraid of the women in their population, so unsure of their own masculinity, so afraid of what would happen if they see a female in the flesh that they force the women to hide their femininity. The Moslems have not earned the right to place this building near the site of their act of war against the United States. |
|
(645883) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 09:45:22 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010. The real problem is that it is not just the fanatics that wish us harm. Remember the scene of how the average Palestinian on the West Bank reacted to 9-11? |
|
(645888) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:01:29 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Aug 3 12:50:58 2010. You're like, developmentally challenged. |
|
(645891) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:04:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 09:31:53 2010. Those there and those here are not the same. Therefore, it's irrelevant. |
|
(645892) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:05:25 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 09:45:22 2010. That's there...not here. Therefore, it's not relevant. |
|
(645895) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:08:41 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by BMTLines on Tue Aug 3 21:49:18 2010. I keep hoping to read about secret societies of Moslem women castrating Moslem men as they sleep. |
|
(645899) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 10:19:12 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Aug 3 16:14:22 2010. Tell you what, dude, Let me kick you in the nuts EXTREMELY hard, and then tell you i'm gonna be your friend, like it or not. |
|
(645902) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 10:25:43 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:05:25 2010. How do you know that the Palestinians that emigrated here don't share those same sentiments? Many immgrants come here solely for economic opportunity, not that they share any great love or admiration for this country |
|
(645905) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 10:32:26 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 5 10:04:56 2010. Uhm, they came here and attacked us HERE, so yes, it is very much "relevant". |
|
(645912) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:24:49 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 10:28:29 2010. omg, i dislike being so negative, bion, but this AMoreira81 fella is very much a foole. To state that the attack on The World Trade Center was a "local matter"...yeesh. I blame the schools he went to for allowing this genius the right to think he "done bin edjumacated". |
|
(645913) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:44:32 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010. Fuck the "world"! The "world" didn't build, ironically, the World Trade Center. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey did. The "world", in this instance, can suck my dick. And they can also shut the fuck up, and mind their own fucking business. |
|
(645914) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Aug 5 11:47:26 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010. Fuck the "world"! The "world" didn't build, ironically, the World Trade Center. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey did. The "world", in this instance, can suck my dick. And they can also shut the fuck up, and mind their own fucking business. |
|
(645917) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 07:53:32 2010. And if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11, would it be acceptable for you to see other people hate all Christians for what these 19 animals did? How would you feel if people opposed a church and recreational center built on one of the largest gravesites in America? (Yes, I know that St. Peter's Church is right across Church Street). |
|
(645918) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:58 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Jeff Rosen on Tue Aug 3 19:11:24 2010. Exactly. |
|
(645929) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 11:05:24 2010. On 9/11/01, MUSLIM terrorists attacked us. They weren't terrorists who happened to be Muslim, they were MUSLIM extremists who attacked us, and IN THE NAME of Islam.You have it all twisted and wrong - - these 19 people were PRETENDING to be Muslim - - they were NOT Muslims in any way because the Quran forbids suicide, murder of women and children, and idolarty (pretending to embrace Allah with means of violence as described herein.). |
|
(645934) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:37:24 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010. It's not just the 9/11 attackers.It's the growing threat from Muslim attackers. Maj. Hasan. Underwear bomber. TS bomber. JFK oil line plot. Muslims are such a small percentage of the population, but they pose a much greater threat than any other religion, race, or ethnic group. |
|
(645936) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:40:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010. And if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11But they weren't. |
|
(645941) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 5 12:54:44 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010. But these 19 people did not do this in isolation. They had massive support and resources from Islamic governments as well as many members of the Islamic religious leadership. How many mullahs in Iran and Afghanistan either support or express understanding of this action? A lot more than 19 fanatics are involved here.Al Quaida itself could not even exist if it did not receive funding and support from official sources. So if 19 people did this in isolation we blame only the individuals involved. But the attack on the WTC was not an isolated incident - it involved a conspiracy amongst Moslem governments and religious leaders to enable it to happen. Do we hate all moslems? No. Do we distrust the motives of their leadership? Yes. |
|
(645952) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:32:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010. They weren't Christian fanatics and St Peters was already there long before. |
|
(645954) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:35:33 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 12:40:55 2010. "19 people" were not involved in this. They did not act alone. Of course people don't hate all Muslims. "All Muslims" are most definitely not responsible, not even the majority. But the Muslim leadership has not exactly been a trustworthy group. It's up to peaceloving Muslims to deal with the Muslim leadership. |
|
(645959) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:44:36 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010. Pretending or not, they were acting on their own twisted version of Islam, and supported through Muslim organizations. You can say all you want that "The Taliban" and all these other Muslim organizations supporting people like this aren't "real" Muslims, it doesn't change the fact that these people did this as Fundamentalist Muslims, in the name of Islam, and it doesn't change the fact that 3000 people are dead.I can argue similarly that Christian Fundamentalists that blow up abortion clinics "aren't really Christians" either, but that doesn't change the fact that that ere Christian fanatical fundamentalists. |
|
(645962) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 13:59:17 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:14:30 2010. if 19 Christian fanatics were responsible for 9/11, would it be acceptable for you to see other people hate all Christians for what these 19 animals did?No need for the "all X/all Y" fallacy. We know that the Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian Caliphate do not represent you. |
|
(645971) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 14:34:45 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 13:35:33 2010. Agreed, and sadly they are not really speaking up against the so-called fake Muslims belonging to the Taliban, Al Queda or any other terrorist organization. |
|
(645974) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 14:38:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010. these 19 people were PRETENDING to be MuslimWe need more Imams saying what you say. I take it you also believe that the Supreme Leader and his Revolutionary Guard over in Iran, as well as all other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, are pretend Muslims too? How about Cat Stevens, who said that Salman Rushdie should die . . . ? We've got whole countries full of "pretend Muslims" then — Libya, Turkey, Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, even Indonesia. |
|
(645993) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 15:28:46 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 14:34:45 2010. |
|
(646052) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 17:18:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Aug 5 12:29:04 2010. No to mention that all 19 had been out drinking and getting laid the night before. |
|
(646056) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 17:58:59 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 17:18:55 2010. And not to mention that most of the "Muslim" countries out there must be "pretend" Muslim countries... |
|
(646059) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 18:08:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Aug 5 17:58:59 2010. You mean like those "pretend" Catholic countries like America? :) |
|
(646060) | |
Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 5 18:17:33 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 5 18:08:16 2010. Why do you hate America so much? |
|
Page 5 of 9 |