Bye Bye Kaepernick

Bye Bye Kaepernick (1394595)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >

(1394595)	view threaded
Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016 fiogf49gjkf0d So look on the bright side, Colin. You'll still be able to sit through the National Anthem, unnoticed, in the stands, and no one will even care.
Post a New Response

(1394598)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com* on Tue Sep 20 18:02:47 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Post a New Response

(1394599)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by LuchAAA* on Tue Sep 20 18:03:51 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d He'll go to Chicago. They got romped last night. Cutler should be cut. Either way Colin will get more chances in the NFL. It's cool to see 98% of the players did not join him and see that he was promoting himself, not awareness to injustice.
Post a New Response

(1394603)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Catfish 44* on Tue Sep 20 18:06:47 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d That's dated 9/16. Did they dump him yet?
Post a New Response

(1394604)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Mitch45* on Tue Sep 20 18:07:15 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Maybe he can join #BLM.
Post a New Response

(1394609)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com* on Tue Sep 20 18:10:31 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Sep 20 18:07:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d zzzzzzzzzzzz
Post a New Response

(1394611)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by R2Chinatown* on Tue Sep 20 18:16:59 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Catfish 44 on Tue Sep 20 18:06:47 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d They said by the end of the season in the article
Post a New Response

(1394612)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by R2Chinatown* on Tue Sep 20 18:18:20 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Sep 20 18:07:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d there's a thought
Post a New Response

(1394615)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Catfish 44* on Tue Sep 20 18:28:50 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:16:59 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d I saw that. They can also write that he's going to retire... Someday.
Post a New Response

(1394733)	view threaded
Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Sep 21 13:55:00 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d CBS Detroit Are National Anthem Protests Costing NFL Viewership? By Christy Strawser September 20, 2016 10:46 AM James Olson, a Sports Illustrated subscriber since fourth grade, watches action-packed NFL games on TV to escape from the endless round of political bickering playing out on other channels. But with more national anthem protests cropping up, he feels like politics has taken over his favorite sport, too. So he’s tuning out. “I want to say to these guys ‘If you weren’t playing in the NFL, you would be working at McDonalds. I think people have had it,” said, Olson, a Birmingham, Mich., resident. He’s not alone. The NFL opener, a Super Bowl rematch between the Denver Broncos and Carolina Panthers, brought 25.2 million viewers — which is an astonishing number of eyeballs. “For comparison, The Walking Dead averages around 14 million live viewers as TV’s most-watched show,” Forbes wrote. But that’s down 8 percent from 2015 and 6 percent from 2014. Sunday’s numbers, Forbes added, were down 13 percent from last year. “This also marked the lowest overnight season-opening rating in seven years,” Forbes found. In a hot and heavy political season with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton lobbing verbal bombs at each other seemingly all day, every day, while the media breathlessly follows along, it’s just too much, Olson said. “Sports used to not be a stage for this, and now it is, so I’m turning it off,” he said. “I refused to watch the Chicago-Philadelphia game because they were going to protest …You start to figure out you can get along without football, there are other things out there I can do.” He spent his Sunday, instead, watching part of a soccer game, spending time outside, and then working out. The #boycottNFL hashtag on Twitter has hundreds of participants who are urging others to send a message to NFL owners and Roger Goodell by sitting out games, turning off the TV and refusing to buy merchandise. “We’re also pissed that the owners aren’t doing anything, that the coaches aren’t doing anything and the coaches aren’t doing anything,” Olson said. “You can do this on our own time. Rent a stage somewhere and see if you can get a crowd of 70,000 people.” San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick started the wave when he pointedly kneeled during the national anthem to protest police brutality and racial inequality. Other NFL players later joined his peaceful demonstration. The players have plenty of support. A high school team in Seattle followed Kaepernick’s lead. “We were talking about things that were happening, taking place in society, and it went from the young men talking about the social injustice that they face on a day to day basis from coaches sharing their stories… And through our conversation, the players decided to do this. To make this movement,” the coach told The Daily Beast. And here’s the other side: “The owners should force them not to use the NFL as a stage for their political beliefs,” Olson said. “Once this whole thing starts, it was like ‘you know what, you’re a moron. What is wrong with you?’” Olson said.
Post a New Response

(1394753)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by LuchAAA* on Wed Sep 21 15:11:53 2016, in response to Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Sep 21 13:55:00 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d NFL viewership will drop. Not just the politics, but the generation does not have the attention span to watch games. And there's less participation than ever in the sport.
Post a New Response

(1394757)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by LuchAAA* on Wed Sep 21 15:22:31 2016, in response to Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Sep 21 13:55:00 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d and I've stopped watching ESPN because they're way too political.
Post a New Response

(1394766)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by SMAZ* on Wed Sep 21 15:49:25 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 15:11:53 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d That is correct. But the NFL will still be #1 as far as ratings and share goes.
Post a New Response

(1394809)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Bill Newkirk* on Wed Sep 21 19:24:03 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by SMAZ on Wed Sep 21 15:49:25 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d
Post a New Response

(1394810)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 19:24:42 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Sep 20 18:03:51 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d If he plays for the Bears, I will stop being a Bears fan.
Post a New Response

(1394811)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 19:25:22 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 20 18:10:31 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Idiot response.
Post a New Response

(1394814)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Sep 21 19:37:28 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 15:22:31 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d I've never watched them. They were always boring, even when not so political.
Post a New Response

(1394815)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Sep 21 19:39:22 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Sep 21 19:24:42 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d If he became one of the Bears, they wouldn't let him play either. And would probably cut him.
Post a New Response

(1394816)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 19:40:57 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Sep 21 19:39:22 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d They shouldn't even think of signing him.
Post a New Response

(1394823)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com* on Wed Sep 21 20:43:04 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Sep 21 19:25:22 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d NO ! you are a Idiot response.
Post a New Response

(1394825)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by LuchAAA* on Wed Sep 21 21:12:06 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Sep 21 19:24:42 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Bears need a QB. Someone will give Kaepernick a chance.
Post a New Response

(1394826)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by LuchAAA* on Wed Sep 21 21:12:07 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Sep 21 19:24:42 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Bears need a QB. Someone will give Kaepernick a chance.
Post a New Response

(1394830)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 21:33:53 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 21:12:06 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Why?
Post a New Response

(1394831)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 21:34:53 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Sep 21 20:43:04 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d duh wtf?
Post a New Response

(1394833)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com* on Wed Sep 21 21:38:10 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Sep 21 21:34:53 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d uh huh
Post a New Response

(1394841)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Sep 21 22:13:06 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 21:12:07 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Why?
Post a New Response

(1394842)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by SMAZ* on Wed Sep 21 22:28:03 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Bill Newkirk on Wed Sep 21 19:24:03 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Great year in the NFL. Giants win the Super Bowl.
Post a New Response

(1394849)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Sep 21 22:46:16 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 21:12:06 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Sure, like they gave Michael Sam one?
Post a New Response

(1394851)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Wed Sep 21 23:05:13 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Sep 21 22:46:16 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d PWN3D!
Post a New Response

(1394871)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Sep 22 09:03:10 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 21:12:06 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d He wasn't good enough
Post a New Response

(1394874)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Sep 22 09:05:05 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Sep 21 15:11:53 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d I disagree. The gambling has a chokehold on so many people it's become a Sunday industry.
Post a New Response

(1394886)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by FYBklyn1959* on Thu Sep 22 09:49:53 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by SMAZ on Wed Sep 21 22:28:03 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d And the Mets won the World Series after having one of the all-time great seasons :) Even better for me, living in Southern California at that time, the L. A. Dodgers had a terrible season, finishing 1/2 game above last place (only because they had a game rained out (on the road I guess, certainly not in L. A.) and therefore lost one fewer game than the last place team in the NL West (San Diego?) This despite a 20 game winning season by one of the few Dodgers I liked, Fernando Valenzuela. I talked shit from late April through late October to the Dodger fans at work, it was great! (Alas, they got their revenge 2 years later. People in LA are fucking vindictive) >:(
Post a New Response

(1394918)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Sep 22 10:41:47 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Sep 22 09:05:05 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d There are still other sports to gamble on.
Post a New Response

(1394945)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Thu Sep 22 11:47:13 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Sep 22 09:05:05 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d "The gambling has a chokehold on so many people it's become a Sunday industry. " Agreed. But thats nothing new. Just about every gin mill in NYC have box pools for at least one NFL game per week at various prices per box. Most of the clientele in those establishments are blue collar working class types where a few bucks invested could amount to a few hundred dollar tax free payoff. Playoff & Super bowl pool boxes are on sale now in some places. For example, K of C halls have box pools with some pools having waiting lists to get in. With some pools, the wait takes years to get a box. Each pool has various payout scenerios. I've seen box pools that sell boxes for up to $10 thou a box. Game day...what a great time to pull off a stick up. Bottom line, billions of $$$ in NFL (illegal) action is bet every season. I wonder how much $$$ is bet in Las Vagas sports book legal action?
Post a New Response

(1394962)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Sep 22 12:35:39 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Sep 22 11:47:13 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d If the NFL fell, all they would do is switch leagues, because someone will continue to play football. Maybe college ball would become bigger. Maybe they would switch to (gasp) CFL or rugby, or any of the other alternate forms of "American football" as it's known outside our borders.
Post a New Response

(1394978)	view threaded
Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick "protest": poll
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Sep 22 13:47:23 2016, in response to Bye Bye Kaepernick, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Sep 20 18:01:15 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d That is Yahoo's headline, not mine. Yahoo poll: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick's protest Jay Busbee Sep 19, 2016, 11:41 AM A new Yahoo Sports/YouGov survey indicates that Americans remain deeply divided about the ongoing national anthem protests in the NFL, with 44 percent of fans claiming they would actually stop watching the NFL if the protests continue. San Francisco 49ers backup quarterback Colin Kaepernick began refusing to stand during the national anthem in the preseason, citing what he termed a longstanding pattern of racially motivated police abuse of minorities. In the season’s first week, players from at least six other teams joined in the protest, taking knees and raising fists during the anthem in signs of solidarity. The survey of 1,128 Americans, conducted on Sept. 13 and 14, found stark differences in perception of the protests among racial and age lines. Overall, 47 percent of Americans oppose Kaepernick’s protest, with 32 percent in support and the remaining 21 percent either neutral or declining to offer an opinion. Respondents under the age of 34 are divided, with 39 percent supporting Kaepernick and 30 percent opposing him, while 65 percent of Americans over the age of 55 oppose the protest. From a racial perspective, only 24 percent of whites supported Kaepernick’s protest, while 63 percent of black Americans supported his action. Hispanic Americans fell short of the midpoint at 39 percent. The form of Kaepernick’s protest, during the national anthem, drew criticism as well; three in five Americans wished that Kaepernick had chosen a different method or forum for his protest. Kaepernick drew criticism on the contention that his protest disrespected the military and, on Sept. 11, the memory of those lost during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Kaepernick has sought to draw very specific lines around the extent of his protest. It’s worth noting, however, that had Kaepernick chosen another forum, it’s unlikely he would have achieved anywhere near as much attention for his cause. Americans are split right down the middle on whether the NFL should permit protests at all, with 42 percent saying the NFL should crack down on protests, and another 42 percent saying the NFL should allow any form of protest to continue. Still, the protests are having an impact on fans’ beliefs. Nearly half of all NFL fans, 44 percent, claim they would stop watching football if protests continued. It’s a powerful statement, one that cannot in any way be verified or quantified unless ratings were to drop by half … which, considering the nation’s ongoing love affair with football, is a highly dubious prospect at best. The bottom line remains, however: at least 44 percent of Americans want their football to be about football … or, if it gets political, only about the kind of protests with which they agree.
Post a New Response

(1394982)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Thu Sep 22 14:01:58 2016, in response to Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick "protest": poll, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Sep 22 13:47:23 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d I don't care whether Colin Kaepernick stands, sits, kneels or sleeps through the nationa LP anthem. His faux antics mean nothing toe. However, if I were an ovner of the 49ers, I'd not let this childish asshole do anything in public that would jeopardize my $2.7 billion asset.
Post a New Response

(1394985)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by ChicagoMotorman* on Thu Sep 22 14:10:37 2016, in response to Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick "protest": poll, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Sep 22 13:47:23 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Only half?
Post a New Response

(1394989)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Sep 22 14:19:45 2016, in response to Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Sep 22 14:10:37 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d It is a Yahoo poll.
Post a New Response

(1395000)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Thu Sep 22 14:35:35 2016, in response to Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Sep 22 14:01:58 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Exactly. It's amazing they let it go on. It's no place for a political agenda. If he wants to do stuff on his personal time, that's his right, but under the paycheck, they should not allow it.
Post a New Response

(1395127)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by SMAZ* on Fri Sep 23 10:12:20 2016, in response to Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick "protest": poll, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Sep 22 13:47:23 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d .
Post a New Response

(1395133)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by AlM* on Fri Sep 23 10:44:20 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by SMAZ on Fri Sep 23 10:12:20 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d And the third half don't give a damn one way or the other.
Post a New Response

(1395239)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by jimmymc25* on Fri Sep 23 20:08:34 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by AlM on Fri Sep 23 10:44:20 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d I'm one of em. Jimmymc25
Post a New Response

(1395253)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sat Sep 24 00:23:42 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by SMAZ on Fri Sep 23 10:12:20 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d No, that's not what the poll says.
Post a New Response

(1395254)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sat Sep 24 00:24:15 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by jimmymc25 on Fri Sep 23 20:08:34 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d So you're a racist? Didn't take you for one, but you're the one saying it.
Post a New Response

(1395307)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by SMAZ* on Sat Sep 24 10:00:30 2016, in response to Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 24 00:23:42 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Overall, 47 percent of Americans oppose Kaepernick’s protest, with 32 percent in support and the remaining 21 percent either neutral or declining to offer an opinion. What's 32 + 21?
Post a New Response

(1395312)	view threaded
Re: Half of Americans oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sat Sep 24 10:31:21 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 24 10:00:30 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d False mathematics. The 21 percent are not included in "do not oppose", especially those who aren't giving their opinions. Stop being a Nazi.
Post a New Response

(1395317)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sat Sep 24 10:38:27 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 24 10:00:30 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d How are the neutral included in the don't oppose, but not in the opposed. Oh yeah, liberal logic
Post a New Response

(1395319)	view threaded
Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll
Posted by AlM* on Sat Sep 24 10:50:40 2016, in response to Re: More Than Half of Americans Do Not oppose Kaepernick ''protest'': poll, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Sep 24 10:38:27 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Wow. You really don't understand? I don't give a damn. To me it's a matter of employer-employee relations and nothing that involves me. I would put myself in the 21% category. Therefore I am not opposed to his action.
Post a New Response

(1395325)	view threaded
Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?
Posted by Catfish 44* on Sat Sep 24 11:38:12 2016, in response to Re: Bye Bye NFL Viewership?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Sep 22 10:41:47 2016.* fiogf49gjkf0d Not the same
Post a New Response

[1 2 3]
	Page 1 of 3	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]