Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 6 of 7

Next Page >  

(1243083)

view threaded

Re: Nilet should be arrested for threating someone with a diffrent oppinion than him

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:31:11 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:27:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
BUT do you KNOW that.


Post a New Response

(1243084)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:36:52 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:28:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What the serious Fuck is it with you and making generalizations. Are their good wholesome black people in this world, sure as fuck there are. Was Michael Brown one of them? No.

And he wasn't shot in cold blood.

Again, Webster's defines "cold blood" as:

showing no sympathy or mercy : done in a planned way without emotion

Wilson was, according to his testimony, afraid. Fear is an emotion, so there was emotion involved. And there is no way in hell you can argue this was planed.

Post a New Response

(1243085)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:39:11 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:29:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No it makes perfect sense. You all need each other to make opinions, you can't think for yourselves. And you won't rest until every single mind is part of your little system, whether it wants to be there or not.


And you try sleeping with bronchitis.



Post a New Response

(1243086)

view threaded

Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:13:34 2014, in response to Re: Nilet should be arrested for threating someone with a diffrent oppinion than him, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:31:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
YES I DO.

Also, your thread title continued to be a lie so I changed it back.

Post a New Response

(1243087)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:16:35 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:36:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What the serious Fuck is it with you and making generalizations.

I am stating the beliefs you hold exactly as you hold them. If you don't like those beliefs, you're free to change them.

And he wasn't shot in cold blood.

He was shot. Repeatedly. From a distance. While standing with his hands up. And begging his murderer to stop. What the fuck do you call that?

Post a New Response

(1243088)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:32:43 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:39:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Since nothing you said has even the slightest bearing on reality, I'll just assume a bit of pus leaked out of your diseased brain and bounced across your keyboard, with autocorrect filling in the rest.

Just to reiterate here, it is the year 2014, and you are seriously arguing that killing black people is legal. You are insisting that if a black kid is shot to death by a white cop, there is no possibility that this might be a crime, regardless of the facts of the case (since this was a grand jury, not a trial jury) and you claim it's "offensive" for the murdered kid's parents to protest this travesty because it insults the memory of white (and Asian) people who were oppressed.

The only appropriate response to your comments is to isolate you from society— either by putting you in prison, or simply refuse to hire you, rent to you, buy from you, or sell to you. However, since I can't do that over the internet, I'll have to settle for calling you an irredeemable asshole for now and advocate for laws to deal with your type. Hopefully there will be an afterlife so you can spend thousands of years burning in Hell for your role in his murder (and the hundreds of other unarmed black people who are murdered by white cops every year).

Post a New Response

(1243090)

view threaded

Re: Nilet should be arrested for threating someone with a diffrent oppinion than him

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:36:51 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:13:34 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So I'm lying by saying that you are saying mean things about me because I don't think like you do....

And you have the gaul to call yourself "Mature" and an "Adult"

Post a New Response

(1243091)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:39:14 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:16:35 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I am stating the beliefs you hold exactly as you hold them. If you don't like those beliefs, you're free to change them. no, you are taking what I say about one person and suddenly making it about all black people.


He was shot. Repeatedly. From a distance. While standing with his hands up. And begging his murderer to stop. What the fuck do you call that?

Underlinder part, self defense

Bolded part, fiction.

Post a New Response

(1243093)

view threaded

Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:46:33 2014, in response to Re: Nilet should be arrested for threating someone with a diffrent oppinion than him, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:36:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So I'm lying by saying that you are saying mean things about me because I don't think like you do.

No, you're a liar because you claimed I "threatened" you even though you know this claim is false.

Post a New Response

(1243094)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:47:48 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:32:43 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, I'm saying it's 2014, and we can no longer base every single fucking thing that happens between a black man and a white man are race related. The person here who needs to be isolated here. the unrepentant, ass-hole, is you. You condemned a man without trial, without evidence, only stories you get feed for other people who were also not there, before the newsprint machines were ever be turned on the night. You had a fucking verdict in your sick head before Brown's body went into rigor.

You can't accept the possibility that a man can assault another man, and the second man can't defend himself.

Brown's own friend, the guy he tried to knock off the store with, testified that Brown stuck Wilson once and was going to do so again when Wilson shot him. An eye witness, a person who's friend had just be shot. yea, I'd tend to believe him before I believe you. At least he has the status "Being there when it happened"

And for record, Protesting is one things. Stealing 50 air Jordan's and then burning down the store is not protesting.

Post a New Response

(1243095)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:52:34 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:39:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ah, so you believe that shooting someone repeatedly from a distance while he has is hands up and is begging you to stop constitutes "self-defense" as long as the victim is black.

So what about Oscar Grant? Was that "self-defense" because the fact that he was lying on the ground, motionless and handcuffed is "fiction?" What about Tamir Rice? Was that "self-defense" because the fact that he was a young child was "fiction?"

More to the point, do you believe that Wilson should have been indicted? Remember, a grand jury is only expected to determine whether it's possible that a crime might have been committed— claims of self-defense are heard by the trial jury.

Post a New Response

(1243097)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:00:14 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:52:34 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
se this is the problem here, you are trying to trap me, but you keep using the faulty logic of expanding one opinion on one circumstance to try to make it sound like it covers all circumstances.


Oscar Grant's circumstances were not fiction. But Oscar Grant is not Michael Brown.

Tamir Rice was not fiction. But Tamir Rice is not Michael Brown.

The sole fiction to which I refer is to Brown having his hands up and callding "Don't shoot".

See, you see "Black People".

I see people. I see a man with a closed fist charging at another. That man saying "Stop, or I'll shoot" and the first just not stopping.

Post a New Response

(1243098)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:02:33 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 05:47:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Shorter version of your post:

Killing black people is always legal under all circumstances without restriction. Anyone who says black people should NOT be murdered ought to be isolated from society because that's the same thing as condemning all white people. Facts contrary to my opinions are fiction but nonsensical rumours that support my position are undoubtedly true. When a black man is murdered by a white cop who gets away with it, black people are not permitted to protest without explicit permission from the white authorities whose crime they are protesting.

Someone seriously needs to exercise their right to self-defense against you.

Post a New Response

(1243099)

view threaded

Re:

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:13:21 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 05:46:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You said I should be killed on site. Do you know, in certain jurisdictions, that action is itself a crime. Including NY if a law that I'm having a hard time finding passed.


At any point in this have I wished you harm? Have I said anything that directly undermines your character without provocation? I would expect the same level of respect I have shown you. But no, I get thrown under the proverbial bus because I have the chutzpah to speak my mind.

You have the good old fringe end mindset that any opinion that is not yours is invalid simply because it's not yours.

The "story" this case is bullshit, the first few "eyewitnesses" say Brown was shot in the back, only changing their story when the autopsy reports came out. You formulated your "verdict" long before that point.

Post a New Response

(1243100)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:17:06 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:00:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So do you believe Oscar Grant was murdered? Yes or no?

So do you believe Tamir Rice was murdered? Yes or no?

So do you believe Darren Wilson should have been indicted? Yes or no?

See, you see "Black People".

I see people.


That is so white of you. Funny how the people who "don't see race" always end up supporting the murder of black people.

Post a New Response

(1243101)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:17:53 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:02:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Shorter version of your posts

I believe wholeheartedly in the lie, cooked up by my liberal masters, that all white people see black people as a threat in the modern era. I will any and all of my abilities to continue this lie, allowing actual criminals to walk free on sympathy instead, because they are Black. I will look down on all opinions that differ from my own. I will continue to make any and all cases about race, even when they are simply circumstantial. I will confuse violence for protest, and vengeance for justice.



Post a New Response

(1243102)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:21:46 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:17:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
"race" is a construction detail. It does not make you who you are.

Oscar Grant was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.

Tamir Rice was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.

Michael Brown was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.

Darren Wilson should not be indicted because he was acting in fear of another man attempting to harm him. that fact that this other man was black should have nothing to do with the price of eggs.

Post a New Response

(1243103)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:24:34 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:17:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, that's what you believe. You just swapped white/black and liberal/conservative.

Presumably this is because you aren't capable of understanding any other person's beliefs except as a slightly twisted version of your own. I've noticed this is a common trait amongst the right wing nuts.

Post a New Response

(1243105)

view threaded

Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, And I Don't Like The Sontarans Either

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:31:58 2014, in response to Re:, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:13:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You said I should be killed on site.

No, I said The Silence should all be killed on sight. Have you watched Doctor Who or not?

You're not claiming to be multiple people like Gamera now, are you? Because unless you're a plural then the thread title couldn't possibly refer to you.

You have the good old fringe end mindset that any opinion that is not yours is invalid simply because it's not yours.

We are talking about whether it should be illegal to murder black people. This is not a subject on which reasonable people can disagree.

The "story" this case is bullshit, the first few "eyewitnesses" say Brown was shot in the back, only changing their story when the autopsy reports came out. You formulated your "verdict" long before that point.

You weren't there and you obviously haven't followed the news. The grand jury testimony was released. Wilson couldn't keep his story straight between interviews.

And I would like to reiterate, since this doesn't seem to be sinking in, we are talking about a grand jury, not a trial jury. They didn't find that the facts of the case supported Wilson's story, they found that the facts of the case didn't matter because killing black people is always legal regardless of the circumstances, meaning that there was no need for a trial jury to evaluate the specifics.

Post a New Response

(1243106)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:46:37 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 06:21:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
"race" is a construction detail. It does not make you who you are.

But it determines how you will be treated by the authorities and by society at large.

If you were locked in a room with two dozen parents who believed you were a pedophile who had molested their children then you would get beaten up and/or killed, and the fact that their belief was false wouldn't make you any less injured or dead. In fact, a guy in England ended up dead under exactly those circumstances.

That race is a complete fiction in biology doesn't make it any less of a reality in sociology. The fact that race is socially constructed bullshit won't bring someone back to life if they're killed by someone who believes it's a biological reality.

Oscar Grant was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.

Tamir Rice was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.

Michael Brown was not murdered because you can not prove anyone intended to kill him.


Well that says it all, doesn't it? Oscar Grant was handcuffed and shot in the back of the head execution-style on video by a killer who confessed to the crime, but it wasn't murder.

Tamir Rice was shot to death despite being a young child but it wasn't murder.

Michael Brown was shot repeatedly from a distance with his hands in the air, begging his killer to stop but it wasn't murder.

Do you believe anything is murder? Would you say that Kennedy wasn't "murdered" by Oswald because no one can prove he intended to kill him? That Lincoln wasn't "murdered" because Booth never intended to kill him? Perhaps you're going to claim that the Holocaust was a gigantic accident, because apparently you believe that "intent" can never be proven under any circumstances ever.

Darren Wilson should not be indicted because he was acting in fear of another man attempting to harm him.

Do you actually know what an "indictment" means? Because the reasons you offer just aren't applicable. In fact, since self-defense is an affirmative defense and Wilson confessed that he did, in fact, kill Brown, an indictment should have been guaranteed.

Post a New Response

(1243111)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Nov 26 07:19:49 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Edwards! on Tue Nov 25 22:28:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Post it here. Let's see your supposed "file". LOL.

Post a New Response

(1243121)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:49:11 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:20:17 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Stop sexually harassing me.

Post a New Response

(1243122)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:50:21 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:18:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And you know this how??? Maybe YOU should have sat on the grand jury armed with your knowledge of what happened.

Post a New Response

(1243123)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:51:09 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:14:39 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So any opinion other than yours is invalid? Talk about mature!!

Post a New Response

(1243124)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:51:57 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:17:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your responses are TRULY inane....

Post a New Response

(1243128)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:00:59 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:49:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Were you abused? There's no reason someone your age should even know what that means.

Post a New Response

(1243129)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 08:05:31 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:00:59 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pw3nt, so you resort to this.

Post a New Response

(1243131)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 08:11:27 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:46:37 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I STILL don't know why you keep on dragging race into this when it has NOTHING to do with this.

Post a New Response

(1243135)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:11:48 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:51:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I shudder to imagine what it must be like to be you. You live your entire life in a sea of endless confusion because you're not capable of understanding the simplest of facts or the most rudimentary logic.

I suppose it's like being schizophrenic.

Post a New Response

(1243136)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:11:49 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:51:09 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Thus proving you aren't capable of understanding simple logic and, as such, I was correct in my assessment that you aren't capable of holding a valid opinion.

Since we are in agreement on the subject, the matter is now closed.

Post a New Response

(1243137)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:13:12 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 07:50:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And you know this how???

Because it was in the news? Because the entire grand jury testimony was published? I know your diseased brain can't understand facts but that doesn't make them stop being true.

Post a New Response

(1243141)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:17:21 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 08:05:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You have openly endorsed the murder of children. The only appropriate response to that is to grab a blunt object and bash you in the face until you agree to act civilised. You are not capable of understanding facts. You are not capable of understanding logic. You are not a human. You need to be told what to do and punished until you do it.

Post a New Response

(1243142)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:18:31 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 08:11:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You need to be wearing a shock collar that'll zap you every time you say something stupid like that.

Post a New Response

(1243153)

view threaded

Re: You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 26 08:42:15 2014, in response to Re: You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:03:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You and another guy get into a fight in a bar and you end up stabbing him with a beer bottle= Not murder.

Your scenario is not specific enough to conclude that it would not be murder.

Post a New Response

(1243161)

view threaded

Re: You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means

Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Nov 26 08:59:17 2014, in response to Re: You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 26 08:42:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
pwn3d

Post a New Response

(1243172)

view threaded

Re:

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 26 09:57:28 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, And I Don't Like The Sontarans Either, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:31:58 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Doctor Who has sucked since Steven Moffat took over. But you suck worse.

Post a New Response

(1243175)

view threaded

Re: B7 Nilet

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 26 10:03:17 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:13:55 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Good thing that you're too scared to mess with cops anymore.

Post a New Response

(1243176)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 26 10:05:18 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED (and you're defending his murderer)., posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 02:35:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's not a "judicial decision", dummy. Unless you're saying that grand jurors are judges??

Post a New Response

(1243177)

view threaded

Re: The only NYPD cop with integrity is Frank Serpico.

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 26 10:22:30 2014, in response to Re: The only NYPD cop with integrity is Frank Serpico., posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Nov 26 04:08:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
pwn3d.

Post a New Response

(1243216)

view threaded

Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, And I Don't Like The Sontarans Either

Posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 14:48:06 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, And I Don't Like The Sontarans Either, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 06:31:58 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
6 blacks came forward and corroborated Wilson's story.

6 people of the same skin color as the deceased.

Are these 6 people being race traitors, or are they being honest. If you truly cared, you'd think before you answered.

Post a New Response

(1243218)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 26 15:01:00 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, And I Don't Like The Sontarans Either, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 14:48:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Seems that Nilet is being a racist here.

Post a New Response

(1243298)

view threaded

Re: No indictment

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:03:29 2014, in response to Re: No indictment, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:17:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The funny part about this is watching you hem, haw, and backpeddle when I confront you at an event. Bring your friends! It will be Worldstar Hiphop-worthy!!

BTW they showed the video and guess what? He was POINTING the gun at passerbys!!! Looks like the jig was up when the police came and he didn't comply. Buh-bye!!!

Post a New Response

(1243299)

view threaded

Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:10:31 2014, in response to Re: The Silence Should All Be Killed On Sight, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 04:27:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Obviously it DID happen. If you don't like the way our laws and justice system are, go back to where you came from.

Post a New Response

(1243300)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:13:56 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:13:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ooohhh.....I see... And yet the GJ STILL voted no true bill....Gee? I wonder why?

Post a New Response

(1243301)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:16:14 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 26 08:18:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Instead of providing me with cute little quips such as the one above, can you RATIONALLY tell me how it has to do with race, and NOT just a thug fighting the police and losing? BTW, you can put the shock collar on me. Want me to tell you in which bar to meet me? We'll have a great time!

Post a New Response

(1243302)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:19:00 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by Edwards! on Mon Nov 24 22:30:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Edwards!, there's NOTHING to debate. And you said you were a peace officer? If so, you should know better. Mike thought he was invincible and was gonna act gangsta to the store clerk and then the police, he stepped to the police, and guess what? He lost.

It has NOTHING to due with the past history of blacks in this nation.

Post a New Response

(1243307)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Nov 27 01:54:11 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 01:19:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
bullshit

Post a New Response

(1243310)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 03:25:45 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Nov 27 01:54:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What part is bullshit? And please tell me WHY you think the way you do.

Post a New Response

(1243312)

view threaded

Re: he was MURDERED

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Nov 27 03:51:45 2014, in response to Re: he was MURDERED, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 27 03:25:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
all of it thats what

Post a New Response

(1243316)

view threaded

Re: Nilet Should Be arrested for ordring someone to be killed because they hold a diffrent opinion

Posted by Edwards! on Thu Nov 27 04:27:46 2014, in response to Re: Nilet Should Be arrested for ordring someone to be killed because they hold a diffrent opinion, posted by The Silence on Wed Nov 26 04:25:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You were there,right at the very moment the whole thing went down,right?

Okay..let's admit this...you are reading transcripts of this case from a one sided point of view..
Its ever so easy to make a judgment call,without the dead person available to fully dispute...

But why bother with any of that since any witnesses for the dead man was 'discredited',right?

First and foremost,even if what you and the state say was True...they,(the state of Ohio) would Never have sent that Blond haired blue eyed WASP Mom and Apple Pie Police Officer to jail.
PERIOD.
You know it..I know it.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 6 of 7

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]