|
|
| Re: Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight (1703059) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Feb 28 00:30:07 2020, in response to Re: Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Thu Feb 27 22:52:29 2020. 3a. The manner of this ban (Presidential Tweet) makes the motivation suspect. If the Pentagon felt that it was a prudent action, they never would have allowed trans people in the military in the first place, or at least they would not have reacted the way they did to the Tweet.3b. So what? A future Republican Party might well be a better party. 3c. It’s the name for a group of people who worked for the Gov. Pence administration who are now controlling HHS. 4. That’s fine if I were voting for mayor, but the House and Senate are essentially parliaments now. You’re not choosing your individual representative, you’re choosing the Speaker/Majority Leader. Only if the Democrat is particularly objectionable would I vote R. 6. The SJWs helped ruin the Democratic Party. But it remains to be seen how horrible the effects of this bail reform actually is. The problem is that a lot of the scare stories come from “tough on crime” sources stuck in 1990 like the NY Post. I actually want to see an objective analysis. 7. The federal government controls things to, and I don’t only vote in federal elections. I care more about voting rights than the second amendment. The former are more fundamental. Early voting isn’t for me, it’s for people who can’t vote on 18th Century Farmers’ Election Day for whatever reason. Republicans just love preventing people from voting to help get elected instead of trying to convince those people to vote for them. |
|
|
|