|
|
| Re: (894538) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 10 |
||
|
| (894817) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Feb 3 15:58:17 2010, in response to Re: , posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 15:54:54 2010. It's perfectly readable in flat mode. |
|
|
| (894818) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 16:00:38 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 15:52:01 2010. hahhahahhah |
|
|
| (894825) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Feb 3 16:06:45 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 13:57:17 2010. Doesn't make it less annoying. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (894834) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 16:26:13 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 15:51:13 2010. "Why don't you revert to form and blame Bush? "That would be too easy...lol..he's an EASY TARGET...and I wanna keep my shoes..lol |
|
|
| (894840) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Feb 3 16:31:28 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 13:20:39 2010. You have a funny idea of what a crowd is. |
|
|
| (894846) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 16:42:52 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 11:06:12 2010. Might have..untill you chimed in. |
|
|
| (894858) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 16:59:51 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:24:56 2010. LOL!Funny..what could you do IF you "got pissed off" to anyone here? Use foul NET SPEAK..[FLAMES]? Come on,brah...have fun...stop taking everything so seriously. |
|
|
| (894870) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Wed Feb 3 17:10:03 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:17:42 2010. "How many people transfer between the F and J/M/Z?????"I used to do it quite often some years back, before the transfer passages were renovated. |
|
|
| (894886) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 17:29:27 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Feb 3 16:31:28 2010. To HIM.. it's just HIM.He's the crowd. That's why he objecting so much. |
|
|
| (894887) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 17:30:26 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 12:59:13 2010. You're missing the point..Nobody cares. |
|
|
| (894896) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Dupont Circle Station on Wed Feb 3 17:56:09 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Train Dude on Tue Feb 2 23:30:49 2010. Permission to fire at Will? |
|
|
| (894897) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 18:05:05 2010, in response to Re: , posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Feb 3 15:58:17 2010. I'm not into flat mode. Gotta be curvaceous . . .http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=894804 |
|
|
| (894902) | |
Just ignore the post |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Feb 3 18:19:23 2010, in response to Re:, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 14:46:22 2010. I would just ignore it if it bothered me that much. You are the one that is making a big deal over it. If this was someone you agreed with politically, you'd probably wouldn't be making this an issue. |
|
|
| (894915) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 18:56:57 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 14:52:42 2010. A number that is almost certain to DROP once the V begins running to Metropolitan.What remains to be seen is how many people from the J remain on the platform at Essex to get the V there. |
|
|
| (894925) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 19:09:46 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 18:56:57 2010. Do you have any proof that the amount of transferees would drop? |
|
|
| (894927) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 19:13:11 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 17:30:26 2010. ..and you think I care?I'm not missing the point here. Where have you proved anything regarding the M-V combo specificially? I don't see it nor do I give a damn. |
|
|
| (894933) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 19:36:10 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 18:56:57 2010. What number? |
|
|
| (894949) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 19:54:10 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 19:13:11 2010. You do give a damn..and You ARE missing the point.Case "in point"..you haven't PROVEN ANYTHING...yet you have "convinced yourself" that you have through out every thread based on this topic.. You "can't see it" because you DON'T want to..more akin to a person not seeing a train coming down the tracks NOT because it doesn't exist,They just don't BELIEVE its there... YOUR objections,however,ARE noted..and respected..But. That is a sign of a very deranged person in need of psychiatric evaluation and/or hospital stay. |
|
|
| (894972) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 20:23:10 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 19:54:10 2010. You need to get your eyes examined. |
|
|
| (894987) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:40:49 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 11:22:00 2010.  WAIT A SECOND, SECOND AVENUE IS A TERMINAL STATION!! SECOND AVENUE IS A TERMINAL STATION THAT'S SERVED OVER 200 CUSTOMERS! THE HECK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT! THAT'S IT! GET RID OF HIM, GET RID OF HIM! GET ME THE ESSEX AND DELANCEY STATS, I'LL TEACH WALLYHORSE A LESSON HERE! |
|
|
| (894989) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Wed Feb 3 20:41:56 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:40:49 2010. THIS ARGUMENT IS ATROCIOUS!!ATROCIOUS!!!!!! |
|
|
| (894992) | |
Re: WILL OLOG-HAIIII STOP REMOVING THE TOPIC LABEL AND BE NORMAL? |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:43:22 2010, in response to Re: WILL OLOG-HAIIII STOP REMOVING THE TOPIC LABEL AND BE NORMAL?, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 09:52:55 2010.  Just take it easy! 
|
|
|
| (894997) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:50:10 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by G1Ravage on Wed Feb 3 20:41:56 2010. YOU'RE IN NEVUH-NEVUH LAND! |
|
|
| (895019) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 21:25:47 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:40:49 2010. LOL!!! |
|
|
| (895021) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 21:27:32 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 19:36:10 2010. The number YOU mentioned.The point is, Current M riders looking for midtown will stay on the V while J riders looking for midtown, especially if they know the V skips 2nd Avenue will likely just stay on the platform at Essex and take the V there. Those two actions by themselves take pressure off the F. |
|
|
| (895024) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 21:28:42 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 19:09:46 2010. Like you can't figure it out from logic?Lets see, Current M riders looking for midtown will stay on the V while J riders looking for midtown, especially if they know the V skips 2nd Avenue will likely just stay on the platform at Essex and take the V there. Those two actions by themselves take pressure off the F, as passengers who previously walked downstairs to get the F at Essex-Delancey will no longer need to do so. |
|
|
| (895026) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:30:38 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 21:27:32 2010. Those two actions by themselves take pressure off the F.I want to see statictical evdience that supports your statement. Otherwise you haven't proven to yourself and the rest of SubChat that you are clueless. |
|
|
| (895028) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:32:24 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 21:28:42 2010. The communication process has broken down once again. I want to see numbers on where you came up with that assumption. |
|
|
| (895030) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 21:37:37 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 20:23:10 2010. I have a fantastic medical plan...so far I'm as good as gold.Eyes are great..so is my THIRD EYE..while Yours is completely closed. |
|
|
| (895035) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:55:19 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 21:37:37 2010. I didn't know it was possible for a person to be a triclops. Umm...both my eyes are WIDE open. Just though you might be aware of that. |
|
|
| (895039) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:03:58 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:30:38 2010. LOL...!winner! You keep entertaining us... Haven't seen such a show like this is a while.. |
|
|
| (895040) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:05:01 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 19:09:46 2010. do You have any proof that it Won't? |
|
|
| (895042) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:05:35 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:32:24 2010. I want to see Your numbers stating your cons. |
|
|
| (895044) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Feb 3 22:09:35 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 02:17:44 2010. Mop dog! |
|
|
| (895047) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Feb 3 22:13:55 2010, in response to Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Chipper10 on Tue Feb 2 20:07:34 2010. I will foam to complete death when I ride it for the first time. |
|
|
| (895048) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:16:42 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:55:19 2010. Wow..Thank you for confirming what I suspected,son. CLEARLY ADMITTING THAT YOU LACK THE WISDOM TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON is very "grown up "of you. Still..its okay dude.. The "smart-ass"act you manage to pull of well enough to get you over. |
|
|
| (895049) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:17:03 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 21:55:19 2010. Wow..Thank you for confirming what I suspected,son. CLEARLY ADMITTING THAT YOU LACK THE WISDOM TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON is very "grown up "of you. Still..its okay dude.. The "smart-ass"act you manage to pull off well enough to get you over. |
|
|
| (895054) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 22:19:24 2010, in response to Re: WILL OLOG-HAIIII STOP REMOVING THE TOPIC LABEL AND BE NORMAL?, posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:43:22 2010. Yeah . . . Zoloft time for himz. |
|
|
| (895058) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:24:02 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Feb 2 21:40:26 2010. no....hes just another fella that loves to ask questions. Chipper is harmless. |
|
|
| (895089) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 22:57:51 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:05:35 2010. I've already did. |
|
|
| (895090) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 22:58:56 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:03:58 2010. I didn't know this was being broadcasted on the tele. |
|
|
| (895092) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 22:59:41 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:16:42 2010. Lack of wisdom? I'm wise beyond my current age. |
|
|
| (895093) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 23:00:28 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Feb 3 22:13:55 2010. I thought you only foam after beautiful young women? |
|
|
| (895095) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 23:03:18 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 22:57:51 2010. Do you REALLY need to see statistics to figure out that:When the new V starts, passengers who previously used the M train and got off at Essex-Delancey for the F will no longer have to do that, thus, staying on the V? AND J passengers looking for midtown can just stay on the platform at Essex and get the V as opposed to walking downstairs to get the F? Those two changes will make the F less crowded when it gets to 2nd Avenue. You don't realize it because all you see is your losing YOUR being able to sit on the V at 2nd Avenue and take that. |
|
|
| (895100) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Feb 3 23:24:34 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:24:02 2010. Harmless, but annoying as hell. |
|
|
| (895109) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 23:33:09 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Edwards! on Wed Feb 3 22:24:02 2010. hes just another fella that loves to ask questionsYeah, in spite of having gotten the answer already, and then posting more threads asking the same question and then not participating in the threads and then posting more threads asking the same question and . . . |
|
|
| (895110) | |
Re: Essex-Delancey Station |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 23:34:21 2010, in response to Re: Essex-Delancey Station, posted by Wallyhorse on Wed Feb 3 23:03:18 2010. Your post doesn't prove anything. |
|
|
| (895128) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Thu Feb 4 00:22:50 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:24:56 2010. 2nd Avenue isn't really in the Lower East SideIt was when the East Village name didn't exist and it still is part of it. Talk to older people and some of them would still call it Lower East Side. Ask some even older people to refresh their mind, they'd tell you it's in Little Italy. |
|
|
| (895129) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Thu Feb 4 00:25:50 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by mr_brian on Wed Feb 3 20:50:10 2010. I -- I NEVER HAD THE VEAL!! |
|
|
| (895131) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by B49 Limited on Thu Feb 4 00:31:52 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Wado MP73 on Thu Feb 4 00:22:50 2010. Technically the station falls under East Village. . |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 10 |
||
