Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment (1367070) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
Page 2 of 2 |
(1447463) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Aug 23 09:46:42 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Joe V on Wed Aug 23 08:07:08 2017. Well...you know why.If you transit starve a system by Not providing a service, people will Still find a way. |
|
(1447466) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Aug 23 09:56:29 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by GojiMet86 on Tue Aug 22 13:18:34 2017. Cool.So basically, its being removed just because exclusive freight rights . |
|
(1447472) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by Joe V on Wed Aug 23 10:32:09 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Edwards! on Wed Aug 23 09:46:42 2017. I wouldn't call lower Manhattan "transit-starved".The jobs disappeared due to technology, mergers, Wall Streeter malfeasance, IT offshoring, Metrotech, Jersey City, Atlanta, Dallas. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1447479) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 11:06:08 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 22 18:34:45 2017. LOL! No, they don't. |
|
(1447489) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Aug 23 11:57:43 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 11:06:08 2017. Well, in 1980 they did. He's only about 35 years behind. |
|
(1447491) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by sloth on Wed Aug 23 12:03:48 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Edwards! on Wed Aug 23 09:56:29 2017. No. It's being removed because of ESA. When there was freight in Yard A in Sunnyside, this was a very important piece of track. Yard A survived into the early days of NYAR but nowhere near as busy as it once was. Then Yard A was removed for East Side Access construction. The same rationale was given for the abandonment of the Montauk Cutoff-- the viaduct is in the path of some upcoming ESA work.Without Yard A, it was a very rarely used connecting track. Without the connection, it's an extra yard track in Blissville. |
|
(1447500) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 23 13:21:23 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Aug 23 07:45:41 2017. Then again, midtown is definitely in vogue. Could the railroad terminals have something to do with it? |
|
(1447501) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by Joe V on Wed Aug 23 13:25:40 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 23 13:21:23 2017. Most of the workforce does not use commuter rail. |
|
(1447503) | |
Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment |
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 23 13:39:27 2017, in response to Re: Montauk Cut-Off Abandonment, posted by Joe V on Wed Aug 23 13:25:40 2017. What percentage does, though? If it's big enough, even if it's not a majority, it could still influence decisions. |
|
[1 2] |
||
Page 2 of 2 |