|
|
| Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (730168) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 17:30:51 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 4 08:39:07 2009. "The rest of the Fulton line opened (although truncated),"Granted, that's true. "the entire takeover to Rockaways" That was just a trade between railroad lines at the time. while a good thing, it's not an expansion. Not a good example. "Instead, the money would have not come to New York at all," False. Moses could easily have made an accommodation for transit wirthin the road projects, and yes the money would still have come to NY. Moses single-handedly fucked up transit expansion in NY. |
|
|
|