Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: London Overground

Posted by David Fairthorne on Tue Sep 12 15:18:28 2006, in response to Re: London Overground, posted by Rail Blue on Tue Sep 12 07:16:56 2006.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
We're not talking the sorts of hyper-frequencies that require no branches.

Agreed. If some trains can terminate at Seven Sisters, then some trains can terminate at Brixton.

I bet that Beckenham Junction features quite highly too.

Passengers per year in thousands (entries, exits)
Brixton 150, 170
Herne Hill 970, 943
West Dulwich 346, 340
Sydenham Hill 173, 167
Penge East 427, 386
Kent House 275, 269
Beckenham Junction 884, 877
Shortlands 502, 506
Bromley South 2345, 2364
Bickley 311, 308
Petts Wood 874, 862
Orpington 1750, 1734

Denmark Hill 797, 772
Peckham Rye 1185, 1179
Nunhead 212, 206
Crofton Park 203, 189
Catford 425, 457
Bellingham 230, 222
Beckenham Hill 59, 57
Ravensbourne 63, 59

I think this seems a pretty good plan. One question is whether the Catford loop alone has the capacity for all remaining traffic to Victoria and Blackfriars. I will try to estimate what passenger services would have to remain.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]