Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? (1591417)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ?

Posted by randyo on Wed Dec 1 20:05:09 2021, in response to Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ?, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Dec 1 12:13:39 2021. It wasn’t so much that the TA though the translucent ads were too expensive. The problem was that the TA wanted to charge the advertisers more money for the translucent ads and the advertisers didn’t want to pay the additional expense.

Responses

• Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - BrooklynBus - Thu Dec 2 12:21:51 2021
  • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - randyo - Sat Dec 4 02:55:12 2021
    • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - Bill Newkirk - Sat Dec 4 07:57:48 2021
      • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - Fisk Ave Jim - Sat Dec 4 09:05:23 2021
      • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - IRTRedbirdR33 - Sat Dec 4 09:36:52 2021
        • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - Bill Newkirk - Sat Dec 4 14:16:34 2021
          • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - FYBklyn1959 - Sat Dec 4 17:58:19 2021
      • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - Joe V - Sat Dec 4 10:37:49 2021
        • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - BrooklynBus - Sat Dec 4 12:19:16 2021
          • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - randyo - Mon Dec 6 02:58:48 2021
            • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - TransitChuckG - Mon Dec 6 03:17:11 2021
    • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - Joe V - Sat Dec 4 13:02:13 2021
      • Re: [PHOTOS] R-32 or R-38 ? - BrooklynBus - Sat Dec 4 13:33:39 2021

Post a New Response