Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167969)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible

Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jul 23 02:15:55 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by Sand Box John on Mon Jul 23 01:12:58 2012. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Thanks, John. This data makes clear how irrelevant the political subdivisions are in this debate. IIRC The A 207th to Far Rock is circa 32 miles and the 2 from E241st to New lot is not much shorter.

Responses

• Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - WMATAGMOAGH - Mon Jul 23 02:37:36 2012
  • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - Jackson Park B Train - Mon Jul 23 14:23:45 2012
    • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - WMATAGMOAGH - Mon Jul 23 16:44:24 2012
    • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - WMATAGMOAGH - Mon Jul 23 16:44:35 2012
• Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - Sand Box John - Mon Jul 23 08:00:06 2012
  • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - Jackson Park B Train - Mon Jul 23 14:41:01 2012
    • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - AEM-7AC #901 - Mon Jul 23 15:00:05 2012
      • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - Jackson Park B Train - Mon Jul 23 15:23:28 2012
        • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - shiznit1987 - Mon Jul 23 15:36:47 2012
        • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - WMATAGMOAGH - Mon Jul 23 16:45:23 2012
      • Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible - WMATAGMOAGH - Mon Jul 23 16:45:41 2012

Post a New Response