Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167968) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible |
|
Posted by Sand Box John on Mon Jul 23 01:12:58 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by merrick1 on Sun Jul 22 22:17:51 2012. The fares aren't high if you stay in Washington. NYCTA would probably charge distance based fares if it had lines beyond the city limits.Washington, DC covers an area of 68.3 square miles, if you include Arlington County and most of the City of Alexandria it's 100 square miles, the 5 boroughs of New York City covers an area of 468.9 square miles. The WMATA compact covers an area of 1,500 square miles, that is more then 3 times greater then then area served by NYCT. Here are the length in miles of the 5 lines on WMATA: 21.941 Yellow lineLength in miles from urban core to terminals 08.936 Gallery Place to Branch AvenueAnd just for poops grins 34.943 Silver line (Stadium-Armory - Ryan Road (VA-277) Ashburn)John in the sand box of Maryland's eastern shore. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |