|
|
| Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167973) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jul 23 02:37:36 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jul 23 02:15:55 2012. Except how many people are riding the A or 2 from end to end? WMATA's fares are on par with other systems for comparable distances from the system core. However, WMATA goes much further out than these other systems, and once the NYC, Chicago, or Boston lines would end is about the point where WMATA fares start to jump. |
|
|
|