|
|
| Re: Be S.A.F.E. (1252195) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (1252490) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:44:38 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 01:39:57 2015. Hahahaahahahaaha |
|
|
| (1252491) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:45:26 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 00:33:48 2015. So you're basically admitting that you really ARE that stupid. Thanks. I guess I was wrong. |
|
|
| (1252492) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:46:33 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Fri Jan 2 00:50:24 2015. No, both of your replies are completely wrong. As usual. |
|
|
| (1252501) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 09:43:51 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 00:14:59 2015. And who are the judges? |
|
|
| (1252509) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:02:01 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 09:43:51 2015. Obviously LuchAAA! |
|
|
| (1252515) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:08:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:02:01 2015. This time we agree. |
|
|
| (1252520) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Jan 2 10:19:48 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 23:09:24 2015. How am I pulling AlM's chain? You think he wouldn't recognize any manipulation of that sort?Our disagreements on Second Amendment issues are disagreements between two intelligent people taking otherwise thoughtful positions. It's like Anthony Kennedy disagreeing on the subject with Stephen Breyer as opposed to rkba disagreeing with streetcarman1. I believe that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" means "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". AlM believes it means "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed unless the Government has a rational basis to do so" thus conveniently ignoring that the rational-basis test does not a apply to fundamental, individual constitutional rights where the applicable test governing legal limits is one of more heightened scrutiny. |
|
|
| (1252523) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:25:46 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:08:57 2015. Then why did you even asked the question if the answer was obvious? |
|
|
| (1252529) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:39:21 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:25:46 2015. The above message is your second unprovoked insult. |
|
|
| (1252532) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:51:37 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:39:21 2015. No it's not. It's not even the first. It's just a legitimate quesiton. Are you overly sensitive? |
|
|
| (1252535) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 10:54:56 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:39:21 2015. When it comes from him, they're called the "unwarranted personal attack". |
|
|
| (1252536) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:56:08 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:51:37 2015. Not as sensitive as you. |
|
|
| (1252537) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 10:57:05 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 10:51:37 2015. What's with emphasis on the "RAPIN'"? You trying to admit something about yourself? |
|
|
| (1252543) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 11:03:33 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 2 10:56:08 2015. How so? |
|
|
| (1252544) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Fri Jan 2 11:03:55 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 10:57:05 2015. Maybe. |
|
|
| (1252635) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:07 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:45:26 2015. Please stop bringing shame to your wife, and your kids.It might turn out bad for you. You're off to a bad start in 2015. Already embarrassed by Silkirk, Nilet, and a few others. Nothing stupid about my posts. I'm the mainstream AMerican. |
|
|
| (1252636) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:20 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:45:26 2015. Please stop bringing shame to your wife, and your kids.It might turn out bad for you. You're off to a bad start in 2015. Already embarrassed by Silkirk, Nilet, and a few others. Nothing stupid about my posts. I'm the mainstream AMerican. |
|
|
| (1252639) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by TUNNELRAT on Fri Jan 2 17:19:48 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 10:57:05 2015. he be "rapin"on sub/ot chat alla time. |
|
|
| (1252640) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 17:22:39 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:07 2015. u 1057 |
|
|
| (1252646) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 18:01:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 17:22:39 2015. thanks for attacking.Figure I'll be at war with you, CHIMM, AlM, WMATA, and Selkirk most of the year. |
|
|
| (1252837) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 19:52:32 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:07 2015. wrong. you dumb troll. go to the beach to be with other similarly superficial people like yourself. |
|
|
| (1252838) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 19:52:53 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:20 2015. wrong. you dumb troll. go to the beach to be with other similarly superficial people like yourself. |
|
|
| (1253222) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 4 20:15:02 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 08:46:33 2015. Wrong in what way? |
|
|
| (1253251) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 4 21:22:15 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 4 20:15:02 2015. The fact that you think I'm "quibbling" over how many years it has beenand I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. |
|
|
| (1253253) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 4 21:32:19 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 4 21:22:15 2015. You quibbled over the number of years a few posts back. Since the exact number is completely irrelevant, you proved you don't actually have any idea what this thread is about.You have not yet offered any reason for giving the number of years. Given your previous history, that means we can safely conclude you don't have one. The actual reason you "corrected" the number of years was because you completely failed to understand that when a person makes reference to an act or in-joke built up over multiple years, it is entirely reasonable for casual onlookers to be unfamiliar with the history and ask people in on the joke to provide context rather than try to wade through several million words worth of posts, most of which are completely irrelevant and all of which are poorly indexed and difficult to search through. |
|
|
| (1253255) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 4 21:55:22 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 4 21:32:19 2015. You quibbled over the number of years a few posts back. Since the exact number is completely irrelevant, you proved you don't actually have any idea what this thread is about.SMH... The fact that you think I'm "quibbling" over how many years it has been proves that you fail to understand nuance and context. I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. Can you think what it might have been? You have not yet offered any reason for giving the number of years.That's because I said: I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. Can you think what it might have been? but you have not shown that you are trying to think of what it might have been. You are being intellectually lazy, like bingbong, and I won't be spoon feeding you until you show some initiative. |
|
|
| (1253303) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Mon Jan 5 00:52:00 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 4 21:55:22 2015. That's because I said: I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. Can you think what it might have been? but you have not shown that you are trying to think of what it might have been.I gave you the reason already. Here it is again: Yes. You completely failed to understand that when a person makes reference to an act or in-joke built up over multiple years, it is entirely reasonable for casual onlookers to be unfamiliar with the history and ask people in on the joke to provide context rather than try to wade through several million words worth of posts, most of which are completely irrelevant and all of which are poorly indexed and difficult to search through. Because you completely failed to understand that, you became fixated on the exact number of years I mentioned and tried to "correct" what was actually an inconsequential detail. If you can think of a better explanation, feel free to offer it. Of course, since you're making excuses, it's obvious that you don't. If you did, you'd have posted it by now. You should learn to understand nuance and context— then you'll stop making a fool of yourself. |
|
|
| (1253360) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 5 07:39:18 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Mon Jan 5 00:52:00 2015. That's not a relevant reason. Try giving a relevant reason. |
|
|
| (1253633) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Mon Jan 5 20:55:43 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 5 07:39:18 2015. There is no relevant reason. You failed to understand nuance and context, you made an irrelevant argument because of this in the manner I previously explained, and now you're flailing around hoping that if you can just stick your fingers in your ears and shout "NO NO NO" loud enough, then people won't notice you've been pwned.After all, as I noted, if you actually had an argument, or even a coherent explanation for why you quibbled over the number of years, you would have offered it by now. |
|
|
| (1253640) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 5 21:51:01 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Mon Jan 5 20:55:43 2015. No, I said that I had a relevant reason and you should try to think of what it is. Since you not only refuse to try to think of it but also claim there is no relevant reason, I'm not going to tell you what it is. If you can't be serious then there's no need for me to tell you anything. |
|
|
| (1253641) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 5 21:53:38 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 5 21:51:01 2015. I am an idiot and a fool. Total clown.Even I can see how you embarrass yourself vs. Nilet. It's hopeless. On the mainboard it's funny how Jules and Nilet beat you. |
|
|
| (1253642) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Jan 5 21:57:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 5 21:53:38 2015. Still kissing nilet's ass huh? |
|
|
| (1253645) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 5 22:17:36 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Jan 5 21:57:57 2015. i have nothing to do wiht Nilet.But man, he's humiliating Terrapinhead. On my end, I'm just putting together some workouts for the New Year. |
|
|
| (1253672) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 02:44:52 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 5 22:17:36 2015. No he isn't, Terripan is right. He has more class in his pinkie than Nilet does has in entire being. |
|
|
| (1253684) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:02:17 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 5 21:51:01 2015. No, I said that I had a relevant reason and you should try to think of what it is.You can say it until you get banned for spamming— it still won't be true. Let's face it, you have all the subtlety of a marching band launching anvils with a trebuchet. If you actually had a reason, you would have posted it, with several exclamation points, while shrieking: "PWNED!" at the top of your voice. Since you not only refuse to try to think of it but also claim there is no relevant reason, I'm not going to tell you what it is. Or in other words, you're desperately trying to hide the fact that you don't have a reason. Your failure to understand nuance and context caused you to misinterpret my previous post and now you're making a pathetic attempt to hide your humiliation— and inadvertently humiliating yourself further in the process. If you can't be serious then there's no need for me to tell you anything. What you're basically saying here is: "You have proven me completely wrong. I can't offer a single reason to think I'm right. However, you can't offer any reasons to think I'm right either, which means you're not being 'serious' which proves I'm right." That's exactly the sort of "logic" I'd expect from the person who stripped naked on the July 2009 Nostalgia Trip and had to be forcibly removed by the police. |
|
|
| (1253685) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:03:56 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Jan 5 21:57:57 2015. Would you stop obsessing over my ass? It's creepy. Here, have a picture and just shut up already. |
|
|
| (1253687) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:04:19 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 5 21:53:38 2015. Funny? It's hilarious! Best Errapin Statio thread yet! :D |
|
|
| (1253688) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:05:20 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 02:44:52 2015. No he isn't, Terripan is right.Are you planning to defend any of his arguments, or is this just that mindless tic you have where you automatically endorse anyone who disagrees with me? |
|
|
| (1253692) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jan 6 05:12:36 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:04:19 2015. Not a good start to 2015 for Terrapin.I don't know why he's punishing himself like this? |
|
|
| (1253714) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jan 6 08:08:40 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jan 6 05:12:36 2015. Punishing? More like rewarding. Your new alliance with Nilet is making both of you look even dumber, which I didn't think was possible. |
|
|
| (1253715) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 08:12:18 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jan 6 08:08:40 2015. Iawtlp |
|
|
| (1253720) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jan 6 09:01:28 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:02:17 2015. So in other words you can't think of why the number of years would be relevant. Just pathetic. You're seriously getting dumber. But do carry on. It is quite amusing. |
|
|
| (1253742) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jan 6 10:16:39 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:05:20 2015. You're a prick. |
|
|
| (1253743) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jan 6 10:18:53 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 05:03:56 2015. Tell to me to my face to shut up you punk. |
|
|
| (1253803) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Tue Jan 6 12:22:27 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 08:12:18 2015. Thank you. |
|
|
| (1253891) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 14:33:00 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by terRAPIN station on Tue Jan 6 12:22:27 2015. You're more than welcome. |
|
|
| (1253892) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 14:34:18 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 16:47:20 2015. Yes you are stupid. Stupid for befriending nilet. |
|
|
| (1253902) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jan 6 14:49:30 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jan 6 08:08:40 2015. There is no alliance you fucking imbecile. |
|
|
| (1253904) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jan 6 14:54:34 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jan 6 14:49:30 2015. Lmao |
|
|
| (1253988) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Jan 6 18:21:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jan 6 09:01:28 2015. So in other words you can't think of why the number of years would be relevant.You're the only one claiming it is. If you make a claim, you're expected to back it up— expecting me to prove your point is beyond absurd. Just pathetic. You're seriously getting dumber. But do carry on. It is quite amusing. So why did you strip naked on the 2009 Nostalgia Trip? I averted my eyes, so I didn't see exactly what happened. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
