Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 9

Next Page >  

(645277)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 12:06:02 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 10:30:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
But it's true. Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.

Post a New Response

(645278)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:09:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:15:36 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You're wrong again, because the Muslim / Recreational Center isn't being built by Extremists...

It's being built by people that support Sharia law. Many will consider that Extremists.

The people who will be using this facility are those who practice their religion peacefully.

We aren't at war with 19 people. They were funded, trained, and directed by terrorist organizations. The 19 did NOT act alone, and if you believe that, you are the one that couldn't be more wrong.

they actually killed us because of so called "atrocities in the middle east" and our support of Israel.

It's nice to see you are rationalizing for these people, however, the 3000 that died in those attacks have nothing to do with alleged "atrocities in the middle east or support of Israel". Fail.

They used Islam to justify their actions, if you've watched any of their martyrdom videos, you'd see they constantly talk about American Occupancy and Zionists, and that by committing Jihad etc etc their attacks are Justified.

I don't care what their justification is, they attacked us. And they attacked innocent people. I don't give RAT'S ASS about their "Jihad", now what they think their warped reasoning for it were in their warped and sick interpretation of their religion.

The fact is they were extremists who took the meaning of the religion for deadly purposes. The people who will be using this facility are those who practice their religion peacefully.

So says who?

So cut the crap by painting every Muslim with the same brush, it's shallow and only makes Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations right when they say "Americans are fighting a war against Islam"

And you cut the crap of making excuses for terrorists. No one is saying that "every Muslim" is the in the same brush, however, if they aren't trying to provoke here, there are hundreds of sites in the city where this could be done. The one chosen is no accident.





Post a New Response

(645279)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:10:15 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Aug 4 11:19:46 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Correct.

Post a New Response

(645280)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:10:54 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:23:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Al Queda is formed on Islam. Their interpretation of Islam.

Post a New Response

(645282)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:13:55 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 12:06:02 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Lack of planning? LOL, you are absurd.

How would "the families", (and I am even stupid for even addressing this as a valid argument, which is absurd in and of itself, but I'll play) be able to buy this location? How would they know the purchases of this building were planning this?

Post a New Response

(645283)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:14:02 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:23:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Also further more while the attack was in the name of Islam, the attack itself was organized, and funded, and carried out by Al Qaeda

Iran is the greater financial (and spiritual) backer behind al-Qa'eda. The perception that this is small, disconnected terror groups is a false one.

So if your comparison was right then they would building a shrine or memorial to Al Qaeda fighters or to Osama himself

Muslims don't do things like that. The attack was done in Islam's name.

Post a New Response

(645284)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:17:41 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:14:02 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The problem is how are you going to tie Iran to Al Qaeda sucessfully? If that was true, why is Osama not in Iran where he would be protected by the Republican Guard? I'm not saying you're wrong, it's just that if we make such a statement we need concrete facts rather than some loose strings.

Post a New Response

(645286)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:21:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:09:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The response below was supposed to be under this quote, I copy and pasted wrong. Sorry for the typo:

and they (the 9/11 attackers) died on 9/11 so they couldn't be the ones possibly building the mosque...

We aren't at war with 19 people. They were funded, trained, and directed by terrorist organizations. The 19 did NOT act alone, and if you believe that, you are the one that couldn't be more wrong.


Post a New Response

(645287)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:24:11 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:17:41 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The problem is how are you going to tie Iran to Al Qaeda sucessfully?

There's enough evidence of al-Qa'eda's ties to Iran.

If that was true, why is Osama not in Iran where he would be protected by the Republican Guard?

I assume you meant to say "Revolutionary Guard", and that very well may be where OBL has been the whole time and not in Tora Bora at all. There's not a hint of OBL being in Afghanistan.

if we make such a statement we need concrete facts rather than some loose strings

Only way to get such facts is to look for them. However, everyone in DC is afraid to touch Iran; they've been fearful of this for decades, in spite of any rhetoric to the contrary.

Post a New Response

(645289)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 12:25:25 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:13:55 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The 9/11 families wanted that site for a war memorial---and had almost seven years to buy it.

The price paid for the site was $4.85 million. In any area of Manhattan, especially with the absurd real estate prices prevalent, that's called a song. Even when the economy was good, it would not have cost more than $7 million. A foundation and the local business community can easily raise $7 million.

It doesn't matter what the purchasers were planning; that's irrelevant.

Post a New Response

(645296)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:34:30 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:09:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They have a facility in the area, so why pack up and open a new facility far away? Also lets be real wherever Muslims want to build a mosque will be met with resistance so lets cut the bull that this is about the area. Look at what happened in Staten Island as an example. Also have you even looked at where the building is? I bet you haven't, it's 2 blocks north of Ground Zero on Park Pl, smack dab in the middle of the block and the building faces AWAY from Ground Zero. So if it was really this GREAT insult that you and the other people are trying to make it, why didn't they just buy a property even closer that you can clearly see from Ground Zero? See when you think about things I dunno.. LOGICALLY... your reasons why they might've done this to insult us... don't make sense.

Second I never rationalized crap, I'm just saying why they attacked, and why they're misusing Islam for. It's called stating facts. While you and everyone else against this facility have stated nothing more than opinion, and ignorance based upon fear and your deep seeded hatred for the religion itself. The fact is you're painting ordinary peaceful, law abiding Muslims, which will be using this facility, including the many non-Muslims who will be using the recreational center, and the theater and restaurant with the same brush. You have no proof whatsoever that everyone who will use this facility is there with the intent on attacking this country. Furthermore if this was a facility that would be so against America, then why invite EVERYONE to use the facility?


The attack itself is unforgivable, also further more you're right about the fact that more than 19 people carried out this attack, but it's not the terrorist, nor al qaeda, that are building this mosque so...you fail... again. Your fears and opinions are based on ignorance, but like I said if you want to continue to prove the terrorist right, continue with the banter. I for one, see nothing wrong with facility, and where it's at. The people who don't support this facility are simply...idiots.

Post a New Response

(645300)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:39:29 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:24:11 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Well unlike Iraq, Afghanistan and other nations in the Middle East, Iran does have a functioning army, and they have the artillery to not hurt the US obviously but def do damage to Israel and Turkey and cause havoc in other nations. So do we risk starting a war with Iran that would require a large force i.e. possibly over 1 mil with the financial shape we're in and our armies stretched thin by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Also will any nation be willing to support us? Also we'd have to deal with China and Russia, in which way I have no idea, but any war with Iran will need both their "blessings" less we risk more than just them.

Post a New Response

(645303)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:46:35 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:34:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Also lets be real wherever Muslims want to build a mosque will be met with resistance

No, that's completely false, never mind irrelevant to the point. We're not the European Union, or Switzerland.

The fact is you're painting ordinary peaceful, law abiding Muslims, which will be using this facility, including the many non-Muslims who will be using the recreational center, and the theater and restaurant with the same brush

That's also completely false. You can tell a lot by the leaders. Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that spawned the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, the Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah . . . and of course, al-Qa'eda.

it's not the terrorist, nor al qaeda, that are building this mosque

Wrong again. See previous paragraph. "Ordinary, peaceful, law-abiding Muslims" would object to having the mosque built in this location. Sharia-loving, Caliphate-loyal Muslims would not.

Post a New Response

(645312)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 12:46:35 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Completely false... then was what happened on SI a fluke? Or you're going to ignore that to prove your point? Also it is the point because if they can't build a mosque in any location, or be met with resistance like it's an evil thing then what are we saying about our nation?

So you're also saying that everyone including the non-Muslims who will end up using the facility are supporters of "the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that spawned the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, the Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah . . . and of course, al-Qa'eda."

Most Muslims that are peaceful support this, people are making a mountain out of a mole hill because of the location, which if you look at where its at, even if it's close to Ground Zero, can't be seen from Ground Zero itself. They're trying everything even scare tactics to try to stop this and in of that we're showing the world how intolerant we are.

Post a New Response

(645321)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:22:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:23:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Al Queda bases it's beliefs on Islam .

Post a New Response

(645327)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:26:52 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"So you're also saying that everyone including the non-Muslims who will end up using the facility are supporters of "the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that spawned the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, the Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah . . . and of course, al-Qa'eda."

Yes . This building is goign to be filled with church ladies playing bridge .

"how intolerant we are."

Go to just about any muslim country and dress how you usually drass , and walk down the street hand and hand with your girlfriend , and see how 'tolerant' those Muslims are .

Post a New Response

(645329)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:27:32 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 10:59:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Japan didn't attack us in the name of their Religion .

Post a New Response

(645332)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 4 13:30:03 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
then was what happened on SI a fluke?

Must be.

So you're also saying that everyone including the non-Muslims who will end up using the facility are supporters of "the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that spawned the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, the Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah . . . and of course, al-Qa'eda."

Don't be silly.

Most Muslims that are peaceful support this

And you know them to be peaceful?

Post a New Response

(645333)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:30:47 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 12:25:25 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So what you are saying here is that the 911 families should have had a crystal ball and known about this Muslim group purchasing this building , and pooled their funds and bought it instead . Of course based on the fact that they should have known that a mosque was planned , even before it was reported . Yes . you make %so% much sense .
Why stop there ? They need to buy up all the buildings around the WTC because perhaps some Muslims may want to build some mosque there .

Post a New Response

(645335)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:31:30 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 12:10:54 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Islam is what fuels al queda

Post a New Response

(645339)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:33:45 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:30:47 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Or they should be like the Boy Scouts...after two years, it looked as though the property would be disused. Organize a foundation to buy the property, but without tipping the hand.

As for all of the other buildings, their usage is accounted for or the owner is a government agency (i.e., Fiterman Hall).

Post a New Response

(645340)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:34:20 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:26:52 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Those Muslim countries are not relevant to the USA.

Post a New Response

(645358)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:49:15 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:34:20 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They certainly are when extremists come attacking us in the name of their religion .

Post a New Response

(645360)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:50:01 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:33:45 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"after two years, it looked as though the property would be disused. Organize a foundation to buy the property, but without tipping the hand."

Are you really that out of your mind ?

Post a New Response

(645361)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:53:40 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:50:01 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No, I am not. Absolutely not.

Post a New Response

(645363)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:55:48 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 13:53:40 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think most would beg to differ with you , and they wouldn't have to look further than the post about 911 families having the foresight to see years prior that this site would be a mosque .

Post a New Response

(645370)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 14:01:12 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:55:48 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They had their chance and they blew it.

If they want sympathy from me, they won't get it.

Post a New Response

(645379)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 14:32:23 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 12:34:30 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Also lets be real wherever Muslims want to build a mosque will be met with resistance so lets cut the bull that this is about the area.

It is completely about the area. There are 100's of mosques throughout the city that have all been built with no resistance. For example, a few years ago one opened right on Myrtle Ave in the heart of "WASP Glendale", and no problems.

Also have you even looked at where the building is? I bet you haven't, it's 2 blocks north of Ground Zero on Park Pl

I am very familiar with Park Place.

And these aren't "peaceloving Muslims", as any of them would understand the problem here. And I would call pro-Sharia peaceloving people either.

Post a New Response

(645380)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 14:33:24 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 13:14:16 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Must be a fluke, 100's have been built and operate out of NYC.

Post a New Response

(645382)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 14:34:15 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 14:01:12 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You are absolutely nuts. Seriously.

Post a New Response

(645424)

view threaded

Re: Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied)

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 15:35:35 2010, in response to Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied), posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Aug 3 21:34:27 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
BTW, another reason why the lawsuit should be tossed. A municipal or state employee in the State of New York cannot sue his or her employer while still on the payroll of the city, county, town, village, or district, or state.

Post a New Response

(645425)

view threaded

Re: Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied)

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Aug 4 15:45:42 2010, in response to Re: Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 01:18:23 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Rachel Corrie or is this something else? Knowing Adam and if this is a reference to Corrie, he probably supported her entirely.

Post a New Response

(645598)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 21:31:44 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:15:36 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
they actually killed us because of so called "atrocities in the middle east" and our support of Israel.

They also attacked us because we give equal rights to woman, are tolerant of gays, and a whole list of other things they hate about our society.

Post a New Response

(645635)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:38:17 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 09:11:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The attack on the WTC was indeed a local issue

So it was the PAPD that invaded Afghanistan?

Tha attack was an international issue. Construction and zoning outside of the contours of the WTC is a local issue.

Post a New Response

(645637)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:41:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 10:59:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It's not the correct comparison. The Government of Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. That most Japanese happen to be Shinto is irrelevant.

The correct comparison would be for a Unitarian church getting built near the abortion clinic and lesbian club bombed by Eric Rudolph.

Post a New Response

(645638)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:41:56 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 10:59:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It's not the correct comparison. The Government of Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. That most Japanese happen to be Shinto is irrelevant.

The correct comparison would be for a Unitarian church getting built near the abortion clinic and lesbian club bombed by Eric Rudolph.

Post a New Response

(645641)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:45:33 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by R143 on Wed Aug 4 13:26:52 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Go to just about any muslim country and dress how you usually drass , and walk down the street hand and hand with your girlfriend , and see how 'tolerant' those Muslims are .

Yet you want us to be just like them and have them declare a REAL victory.


Post a New Response

(645643)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 22:46:26 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:41:56 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I agree with that.

By the way, on a similar note, is a Unitarian Gathering place a "Church", I don't think it is.

Post a New Response

(645644)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:46:50 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 21:31:44 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They also attacked us because we give equal rights to woman, are tolerant of gays, and a whole list of other things they hate about our society.

FALSE!! The Teabaggers didn't yet exist in 2001.


Post a New Response

(645649)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:49:10 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 22:46:26 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ok...a Unitarian "gathering place" near that lesbian club or abortion clinic then.

Post a New Response

(645657)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 22:57:12 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:49:10 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No I didn't mean it that way, I was seriously asking that question, I think Unitarians don't consider themselves a church (or some don't), but guess it depends on the congregation. Many call themselves "Meeting Houses" instead of churches, as it's not technically a "church" group, it's a fellowship.



Post a New Response

(645659)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 22:58:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 4 22:46:50 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
????????????

Post a New Response

(645755)

view threaded

Re: Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied)

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:35:08 2010, in response to Re: Lawsuit planned (Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied), posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 15:35:35 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
[citation needed]

Post a New Response

(645757)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:36:11 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Aug 4 09:11:06 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(645758)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:37:59 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 22:57:12 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I thought the Friends had the Meeting Houses.

Post a New Response

(645759)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:41:18 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 21:31:44 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
False. They don't give a shit about that.

Post a New Response

(645760)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:52:03 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Aug 4 11:15:36 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Let's get this straight:

Do you seriously believe that Islamic terrorists will stop hating us if we withdraw from the Near East and stop supporting Israel? NO!

We were attacked because we are the vanguard of Western Civilization. It's not something that we should change.

Post a New Response

(645761)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:54:10 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 14:32:23 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It is completely about the area. There are 100's of mosques throughout the city that have all been built with no resistance. For example, a few years ago one opened right on Myrtle Ave in the heart of "WASP Glendale", and no problems.

It's more likely that you hadn't heard of the controversy, not that there wasn't one.

Post a New Response

(645762)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:55:36 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Aug 4 14:32:23 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Also, Sharia just means Islamic law. You think it's wrong for people to want to follow the laws of their own religion? What about Jews who follow "Mosaic Law?"

Post a New Response

(645766)

view threaded

Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 5 03:24:16 2010, in response to Re: Landmarking of 45-47 Park Place denied, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 5 02:55:36 2010.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Sharia just means Islamic law. You think it's wrong for people to want to follow the laws of their own religion?

False argument, especially when it contradicts their following the law of the land.

What about Jews who follow "Mosaic Law?"

Antisemitism now, or just anti-Americanism? Our jurisprudence is founded on Mosaic law.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 9

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]