Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(349966)

view threaded

Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That's what some charged with law enforcement in Michigan seem to think. Ever heard of the Fourteenth Amendment, guys? No, it hasn't been repealed. No, this kind of stuff cannot be borne or justified by any American.

Global Politician

No Justice for White Victim of Savage Crime

Kyle Bristow - 8/27/2008

On June 9, 2008 the Global Politician published a column of mine entitled Hunting Season for Whites, which was republished on dozens of websites, including Jared Taylor’s American Renaissance and even a major news website all the way in Italy. The article dealt with the wee hours of the morning of June 1, 2008 when a mob of nearly two dozen black teenagers terrorized the citizens of Mount Clemens, Michigan. To recapitulate what happened, these hoodlums robbed people of cell phones and wallets, threw a brick through the window of a moving car, and beat up their victims so badly that at least one of their targets was hospitalized with a fractured skull.

The horror of what transpired was articulated in an article in the Macomb Daily entitled “Mob of Young Men Attacks” (6/2/2008). According to that article, “(W)orkers at the gas station [where one of the beatings by the mob occurred] said the man was confronted near a pay telephone. When the gas station attendant saw what was happening, he locked the front door.” As the man pounded on the door to beg the gas station attendant to let him in so that he could get away from the thugs, the mob arrived. The article in the Macomb Daily goes on to say that “An employee (of the gas station) said workers had to wash the man’s blood from the door (later that day).”

The innocent white bystander at the gas station was, however, not the sole victim of the black mob. According to a press release posted on the website of the Macomb County Sheriff’s Office:

“(W)hen a 29-year old man, and his wife, were driving on North River Road . . . more than two dozen men wearing ball caps and baggy shorts spread out across the street and blocked traffic. The victim tried to drive past them and someone threw a brick in his window. He stopped his car and got out to see what happened and was beaten unconscious and left with a fractured skull.”

In an article in the Macomb Daily entitled “Violence Shocks Community” (6/3/2008), the newspaper reports that “In a 911 cellular phone call released to the media Monday, the beaten man’s frantic wife is heard screaming repeatedly as a dispatcher unsuccessfully tries to get information from her.”

Macomb County Sheriff Mark Hackel said in an interview with WJR radio host Frank Beckmann on June 6, 2008 that when the wife of the victim called 911, “You could hear the sheer terror in her voice.” One would expect this heinous crime to not go unpunished.

The victim who sustained the fractured skull was Andy Kauffman. At the courtroom where his attacker faced anything but justice, Kauffman’s wife cried and said, “I miss the Andy I used to know” according to an article in the Macomb Daily entitled “Teen Sentenced in Mob Attack in Mount Clemens” (8/26/2008). Andy Kauffman, father of boys aged 9, 7, and 3, will never be the same, for he sustained permanent brain damage in his unprovoked beating by the savages.

What is the punishment for forming a mob, beating into a bloody pulp a man at a gas station, throwing bricks at cars, and savagely beating a father of three boys to the point where he sustains brain damage? Deonte J. Williams, for his barbaric crimes, was sentenced to only 19 months in a juvenile prison. According to Michigan’s Holmes Youthful Trainee Act, since Williams is only 17-years-old, if he “succeeds” in jail, he will have no public criminal record when he is released. Macomb Circuit Judge Edward Servitto, Jr. purportedly told Williams during sentencing, “Son, you got a chance at life still,” before he ordered Williams to earn his GED while behind bars.

Has our judicial system really degenerated to the point where a savage criminal can ruin the life of an innocent young father, deprive the victim’s wife of the man she married, and take away the father of 9, 7, and 3-year-old boys, and is only sentenced to a measly 19 months in jail where he will be able to acquire a meager education and not have a public criminal record because of the age at which he committed his vicious crime? Is it really that screwed up?

It gets worse.

In the aforementioned radio interview with Frank Beckmann, Macomb County Sheriff Mark Hackel was asked whether or not it is a hate-crime for blacks to attack whites. Hackel answered, “Well, that’s questionable. I don’t know if it (hate-crime legislation) applies to an unprotected class, and I don’t know if whites are part of that. I’m not sure.”

Beckmann was shocked to hear Hackel suggest that whites are not entitled to equal protection under the law. A taken aback Beckmann asked:

“You mentioned ‘unprotected class.’ You mean white people are not protected by hate crime legislation?”

Hackel answered that question by saying, “It doesn’t appear as such at this point and time that there is something that would qualify.”

Hackel’s radio interview can be heard online at YouTube.

Whites need to be careful in the not-so-great state of Michigan. After all, there really is no deterrent from preventing certain races from outright attacking innocent white folk. The laws, the courts, and at least one sheriff will not protect them or their families from savage crimes.


Post a New Response

(349981)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 07:13:32 2008, in response to Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
When the lawsuit is filed (on constitutional grounds)...this person should use Baker v. California as his basis. And you wonder why the race for President matters so much...which way would the justice that replaces John Paul Stevens go?

Post a New Response

(349999)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Aug 31 08:23:39 2008, in response to Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
In NY he would have been tried as an adult as a juvenile is under 17 or 16 & under in NYS.

Post a New Response

(350000)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 08:44:47 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Aug 31 08:23:39 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Heck...this state has sent away a 13-year old for a potential life sentence (Eric Smith, denied parole at least twice).

Post a New Response

(350006)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Sun Aug 31 09:28:51 2008, in response to Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
kauffman?

Apparently the similarities between parts of Michigan and Philly become more numerous by the day.

Post a New Response

(350009)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by BMTLines on Sun Aug 31 11:21:01 2008, in response to Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
This is one of the reasons I oppose such legislations and will NEVER vote "guilty" if I am ever on a jury in a case where someone is charged with a "hate crime" no matter what.

Post a New Response

(350036)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 16:39:20 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by BMTLines on Sun Aug 31 11:21:01 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It's a real wonder that such laws that flout the 14th Amendment (and are therefore unconstitutional) ever make it through state legislatures.

Post a New Response

(350037)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Aug 31 17:05:44 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 16:39:20 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d

It's even worse than that. Since the color of the victims were white, this story got almost no national coverage. And even white people would be afraid to challenge a hate crimes law for fear of looking racist.



Post a New Response

(350038)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Aug 31 17:07:25 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 07:13:32 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Another reason to vote for McCain. Obama would flood the courts with judges who think that hate crimes actually don't apply to whites.

Post a New Response

(350052)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 18:16:52 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Aug 31 17:07:25 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
However...can McCain get such a judge past Democrats in the Senate? Likely such a nominee won't even get a floor vote (being killed in committee).

The Senate is likely to be as much as 60-40 Democrats for the next Congress, more likely 59-41 if Dole can hold off a Democratic challenger. Otherwise, the Democrats have a filibuster-proof Senate.

Post a New Response

(350053)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 18:17:44 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Aug 31 17:07:25 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That was actually a trick statement...Obama wouldn't want to reverse Baker either...and remember SCOTUS has also ruled the other way with the same court in Weber.

Post a New Response

(350060)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AlM on Sun Aug 31 18:39:21 2008, in response to Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 02:59:42 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Your headline is pretty irrelevant. The attackers got light sentences because the state of Michigan tried them as juveniles, not because some county sheriff decided that whites aren't protected by hate crime laws.

The crimes committed are vicious enough that the attackers could have received very long sentences if they had been tried as adults, even if they weren't tried for any hate crimes.



Post a New Response

(350071)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 19:24:22 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by AlM on Sun Aug 31 18:39:21 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Your headline is pretty irrelevant

No, it actually is not.

The attackers got light sentences because the state of Michigan tried them as juveniles, not because some county sheriff decided that whites aren't protected by hate crime laws

"Some county sheriff" was pressed on the matter of the fourteenth amendment versus hate crime laws (whereupon there should not be a "versus"), and this was his on-the-record reply (creating the "versus"). Especially relating to the entire incident. So the headline centers around that POV by that county sheriff more than the incident.

The crimes committed are vicious enough that the attackers could have received very long sentences if they had been tried as adults, even if they weren't tried for any hate crimes

That is true indeed.

Post a New Response

(350074)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Easy on Sun Aug 31 19:36:19 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 31 19:24:22 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Sounds like the sheriff is an idiot, but wouldn't you have to ultimately blame the DA? His/her comments would probably be very rel event. It's possible that there wasn't evidence of a hate crime and that black people were also attacked by the mob.

Post a New Response

(350077)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 19:50:14 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Aug 31 17:05:44 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
However...as is always the case, someone is going to try.

Post a New Response

(350103)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Easy on Sun Aug 31 21:24:04 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Aug 31 08:44:47 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
350,000!

Post a New Response

(350131)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Forest Glen on Sun Aug 31 23:17:06 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by BMTLines on Sun Aug 31 11:21:01 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The whole concept of a hate crime is asinine. If someone swings a baseball bat at you it doesn't matter whether they did it for the hell of it or because of your race. The damage is the same.

Post a New Response

(350135)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 31 23:21:41 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Forest Glen on Sun Aug 31 23:17:06 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
nope

Post a New Response

(350138)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Forest Glen on Sun Aug 31 23:37:24 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 31 23:21:41 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(350140)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 31 23:41:24 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Forest Glen on Sun Aug 31 23:37:24 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(350152)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 1 01:12:29 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Forest Glen on Sun Aug 31 23:17:06 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTP

Post a New Response

(350153)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 1 01:13:24 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 31 23:21:41 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
yes

Post a New Response

(350154)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 1 01:13:36 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 1 01:13:24 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I mean: nope

Post a New Response

(350185)

view threaded

Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?

Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Sep 1 09:37:34 2008, in response to Re: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws?, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 1 01:13:36 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
lol

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]