Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

 

Page 1 of 4

Next Page >  

(2016997)

view threaded

Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:35:05 2025


113 House democRATS

voted against a resolution condemning the boulder, colorado fire bomb anti-Semitic terror attack. Let that sink in for a moment. Over 1/2 of house democRATS. How any self respecting Jew or any self-respecting American can ever vote for a democRAT again is beyond me. The party makes its position on anti-Semitism obvious.

Post a New Response

(2016999)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 11:43:32 2025, in response to Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:35:05 2025.

I don't know the difference between HRES 488 (the resolution you refer to) and HRES 481 (which passed with no nay votes), but perhaps you can explain why those same Democrats would vote for one and not the other?

Post a New Response

(2017002)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 12:14:43 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 11:43:32 2025.

Not my responsibility to explain democrap voting. Perhaps you wish to taje a shot to justify it

Post a New Response

(2017028)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Dan on Tue Jun 10 13:51:23 2025, in response to Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:35:05 2025.

The democrats are the party of Hamas, the party of Islamists in America like Zohran Mamadami here in NYC.

Post a New Response

(2017034)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 14:27:47 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 11:43:32 2025.

Why.dont you explain why if there were zero no voter for 481, and the bills were the same, why did 113 vote no? How did the democrat, omar vote on both bills?

Post a New Response

(2017036)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 15:48:46 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 14:27:47 2025.

Omar (and AOC) voted for HRES481. Tliab voted present. See here. Why don't you do your own research?

The Squad would be an afterthought if the GOP didn't spend time amplifying the actions of a bunch of powerless backbenchers.

Post a New Response

(2017041)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:07:05 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 15:48:46 2025.

So you still have not explained why, if the 2 resolutions were essentially the same, as you claim, why did 113 democrats vote no?


Post a New Response

(2017042)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:11:56 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:07:05 2025.

Procedural maneuver? I honestly don't know, but I suspect it isn't much of anything.

Post a New Response

(2017044)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:14:45 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:11:56 2025.

Of course because you support the party of hamas and anti-Semitism.

Post a New Response

(2017046)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:22:41 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:14:45 2025.

I support making decisions rooted in actual knowledge and facts, not speculation. I'm genuinely curious to know why the votes went different ways, but I have no answers as to why that is.

OTOH, you seem to support nothing but outrage, most of it baseless.

Post a New Response

(2017048)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 10 16:30:32 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:22:41 2025.

I support making decisions rooted in actual knowledge and facts, not speculation

There's no speculation as to the motivations of Mohamed Sabry Soliman. Even CNN reports that he "wanted to kill all Zionist people" and that he specifically tried to burn Jews with a makeshift flamethrower.

Therefore, there is no speculation about the motives of 113 Democrats who voted against a resolution condemning that act.

Those are the facts.

Post a New Response

(2017049)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:32:05 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:22:41 2025.

LOL, coming from a little communist

Post a New Response

(2017053)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:45:23 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:32:05 2025.

So it seems the issue has to do with the language vis a vis ICE and a proposed draft that said "Free Palestine" is anti-Semitic speech. There was a clear partisan edge to Evans's resolution that Democrats objected to. Bipartisan language, shockingly, had bipartisan support.

MTG also voted present on the resolution that did pass, though I have no idea why.


Post a New Response

(2017056)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Jun 10 16:59:22 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 10 16:30:32 2025.

The police didn't know his motive though.

And his daughter was going to be a doctor.

and he only burned "pro-Jewish protestors". Protests, you know, like in LA!

Post a New Response

(2017059)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 17:09:25 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Jun 10 16:59:22 2025.

Yes, molotov cocktails are mostly peaceful except for breaking glass.

Post a New Response

(2017061)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 10 19:02:35 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:45:23 2025.

“Free Palestine” is anti-Jewish speech.

Post a New Response

(2017064)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 10 19:16:22 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Dan on Tue Jun 10 13:51:23 2025.

Yep!

Post a New Response

(2017066)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 10 19:18:52 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 10 19:02:35 2025.

I agree with your statement

Post a New Response

(2017069)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 10 21:05:34 2025, in response to Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:35:05 2025.

Get this through your head - NOTHING is unbelievable anymore. Everything you once thought was unthinkable is now thinkable. The genie has been released from his bottle.

I am not really surprised by any of this. Some of you knuckleheads thought I was being paranoid and that I should wear a tinfoil hat. I’ll bet you don’t think that way anymore. You see, I had an uncle who went through Bergen Belsen, losing his parents and two sisters. He was religious before the Holocaust but afterward became angry at God and became staunchly anti-Orthodox. He moved to the US in 1947.

He told us repeatedly when I was a kid in the ‘70s that he fully expected anti-Semitism to rise in the US eventually and that another Holocaust was very possible. He died in 2007. Now it looks like he was right. He told us that anti-Semitism will always rise whenever society is in trouble. I think we are seeing that now too, with the new extreme Leftist Democratic Party, sympathy for murderers on college campuses and attacks on Jews everywhere.

Post a New Response

(2017070)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 21:47:34 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 10 21:05:34 2025.

Unfortunately, so long as you have liberal leftist Jews who "think" like WAMTAROACH, your uncle may be prophetic.

Post a New Response

(2017076)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:38:24 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 16:07:05 2025.

Train Dude----those lefties don't have to explain anything to you or to me or anyone else. All we have to do is see what they post and how they defend the indefensible to know what a pack of assholes they've turned out to be. I need no proof to know a human viper when I see one.

Post a New Response

(2017077)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:43:29 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 17:09:25 2025.

I suppose Jews can support the Dimwitorats if that's their choice, but for the life of me for these people to insist that that party is still the best hope for support for the Jewish Americans is beyond pathetic. They have no memory or don't care to remember how so many Jews in Europe in the 1930's saw this as passing phase. I know how they felt when between 1941-1945 they marched lock step in the gas chambers.

These lefties hate America, hate Jews and hate anyone standing up to the pack of human mistakes trying to destroy our country. Man, these guys piss me off no end.

Post a New Response

(2017078)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:46:43 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 16:45:23 2025.

"FROM THERIVER TO THE SEA IS THE MAIN CALLING CARD FOR HAMAS, AND ALL ANTI SEMETIC ASSHOLES FROM OUR RIVER TO THE SEA. THEY HATE JEWS AND TALK ABOUT KILLING ALL OF THEM. MY GOD, HOW CAN ANYONE NOT SEE ANY RESEMBLANCE TO WHAT THEY' RE SAYING AND WHAT SOME MUSTACIOD NUT WAS SAYING BACK IN THE 1930'S. PLEASE AMERICAN JEWS, WAKD THE @#$% UP.

Post a New Response

(2017079)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:49:54 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 21:47:34 2025.

And what a sorry shame that is. I'd like to tell you that you are probably wrong on this but that would make me even more naive than I could ever be.

Post a New Response

(2017083)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 23:06:49 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:38:24 2025.

Amen

Post a New Response

(2017084)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 10 23:16:24 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Dan on Tue Jun 10 13:51:23 2025.

[straight jacket man]

Post a New Response

(2017098)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 10:33:01 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Tue Jun 10 22:43:29 2025.

I suppose Jews can support the Dimwitorats if that's their choice, but for the life of me for these people to insist that that party is still the best hope for support for the Jewish Americans is beyond pathetic.

The current Republican Party has little in common with Jewish values. The same cannot be said about the Democrats. This isn't to say that the Republicans have nothing in common or that the DNC is entirely in lockstep with Jewish values, but this is the reality. For example, banning abortion after the detection of a fetal heartbeat is directly in conflict with Jewish law, which requires abortion to save the life of the mother at all times. A fetus is not a person in Jewish law and is not afforded the "benefits" of "personhood" until after birth.

They have no memory or don't care to remember how so many Jews in Europe in the 1930's saw this as passing phase.

Yes they do. It is why many Democratic Jews are obtaining dual citizenship so that if shit hits the fan, they have somewhere to go.

Here is one take no why Jews vote Democratic, and here is another. There are plenty others out there. But perhaps most importantly from that second link, there is this paragraph:

"For all the legitimate fears aroused by violent anti-Israel protests over the last 10 months, let’s remember that the bloodiest days for Jews in America were at the hands of the far right, not the far left. The deadliest attack on Jews in U.S. history was perpetrated at a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018 by a white nationalist who believed in the far-right “great replacement” conspiracy theory that Jews are working to flood the country with illegal immigrants. The previous year, neo-Nazi Trump supporters marched through Charlottesville, Va., chanting, “Jews will not replace us.” Then-President Trump insisted that some of them were “very fine people.”"



Post a New Response

(2017099)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 10:34:01 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 10 19:02:35 2025.

Freedom of speech, even if I dislike the speech, is a valuable right that should not be infringed upon.

Post a New Response

(2017104)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by chicagoMotorman on Wed Jun 11 10:52:58 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 10:34:01 2025.

But you do disagree with 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦 p𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩?


Post a New Response

(2017105)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 11:09:35 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by chicagoMotorman on Wed Jun 11 10:52:58 2025.

Does the OTChat kangaroo court ever go into recess?

Post a New Response

(2017107)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by AlM on Wed Jun 11 11:32:52 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 11:09:35 2025.

No.

I admire your perseverance. Other than you and S-P, the most liberal people who still make political posts here are mtk and Jeff Rosen.



Post a New Response

(2017110)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 11:46:08 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by AlM on Wed Jun 11 11:32:52 2025.

There are reasons why I am here less often than I used to be. One of the most significant ones is the insanity of the kangaroo court, but sadly, that is what the right has descended into being (and not just here on OTChat).

Post a New Response

(2017117)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by mtk52983 on Wed Jun 11 12:26:30 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by AlM on Wed Jun 11 11:32:52 2025.

Bingbong begs to differ. I also dislike being called a liberal as those who call themselves that are far to the left of me

Post a New Response

(2017120)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jun 11 12:34:17 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 11:09:35 2025.

Argumentum ad lapidem. Answer the question.

And only false issues are raised in a kangaroo court, you piece of . . .

Post a New Response

(2017128)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by AlM on Wed Jun 11 13:10:48 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by mtk52983 on Wed Jun 11 12:26:30 2025.

Haven't seen a political post from bingbong in a long time. Would you prefer "least illiberal"? :)

In any case, "most liberal" is a comparative, not an absolute. I am the "most conservative" person in some groups, yet I am not a conservative.



Post a New Response

(2017144)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Jun 11 15:33:37 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 11:46:08 2025.

So disagreeing woth your nrilliant insight constitutes a kangaroo court? Perhaps you overestimate that which you think passes for intelligence.

Post a New Response

(2017151)

view threaded

Re: Un-f—ing-believable

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jun 11 16:13:51 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Jun 11 15:33:37 2025.

He's already lost. Use of any logical fallacy is a concession of defeat.

Post a New Response

(2017164)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 11 18:09:12 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by mtk52983 on Wed Jun 11 12:26:30 2025.

Do not speak for me. My absence here is a vote, a message in itself. The lack of disrespect for any person deviating from MAGA here (yes, that’s what it is…get over yourselves). is obvious.

I want no part of it.

Post a New Response

(2017165)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 11 18:15:02 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 11 18:09:12 2025.

"Lack of disrespect"? As I see it, there is no lack of disrespect for you and it's well earned.

Post a New Response

(2017168)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Jun 11 18:25:10 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 11 18:09:12 2025.

Lol

Post a New Response

(2017169)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 11 18:26:27 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Jun 11 18:25:10 2025.

I bet if food were involved she'd want a part of it.

Post a New Response

(2017170)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 11 18:26:49 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 11 18:15:02 2025.

As if y,our messages haven't been confused by spellwreckers.

Post a New Response

(2017171)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Jun 11 18:38:55 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 11 18:26:27 2025.

LMAO

Post a New Response

(2017172)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 11 18:40:27 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 11 18:26:49 2025.

Just pointing out your glaring error's, my love!

Post a New Response

(2017180)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 21:28:40 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jun 11 10:33:01 2025.

You DO realize that Donny wasn't talking about the people marching and shouting at Charlottesville, do you? Thus has been misparaphrased to death

Post a New Response

(2017182)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jun 11 21:49:24 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 21:28:40 2025.

He probably believes that Brian Sicknick died from head trauma from someone hitting him with a fire extinguisher too, when the poor guy died at home from a heart attack and was never attacked.

Post a New Response

(2017188)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 22:04:33 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 10 23:16:24 2025.

Well, anecdotal as it is, is he wrong on this case?

Post a New Response

(2017194)

view threaded

Re: Un—ing Believable

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 11 22:13:36 2025, in response to Re: Un—ing Believable, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 21:28:40 2025.

IAWTP. He was talking about the fact that there were protests both for and against the removal of the Confederate monuments, and that there were fine people protesting against the removal (not the Neo-Nazis).

It was still a stupid thing to say.

Post a New Response

(2017198)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 11 22:17:22 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 22:04:33 2025.

Yes

Post a New Response

(2017199)

view threaded

Re: Unfucking Believable

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 11 22:19:56 2025, in response to Re: Unfucking Believable, posted by AlM on Wed Jun 11 11:32:52 2025.

And me!

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

 

Page 1 of 4

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]