|
|
| Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37) (1618286) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||
|
| (1630921) | |
Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37) |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jun 9 06:52:53 2019, in response to Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37), posted by Mtk52983 on Sun Jun 9 06:37:15 2019. Yep! |
|
|
| (1630994) | |
Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83) |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Sun Jun 9 16:19:42 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 19:40:57 2019. How come you are not participating in the quote unquote incel thread since you stated you are undefeated in the realm of argument and debate re. sex? The great Osmosis Jones posted in that thread so maybe that is the reason. I saw that you mentioned Metropolitan Avenue in another thread so pray tell when are you relocating to the area approximating Metropolitan and 116th or alternatively Yellowstone Boulevard in Queens and register as a Democrat like you told us you were going to do. I am working LaGuardia to Denver tomorrow morning and will probably sit in my jump seat and stare straight ahead at the bulkhead wall. |
|
|
| (1631006) | |
Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83) |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jun 9 17:04:57 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by cortelyounext on Sun Jun 9 16:19:42 2019. How come you are not participating in the quote unquote incel thread since you stated you are undefeated in the realm of argument and debate re. sexYes. I win those arguments all the time. It's settled. Why revisit it? The great Osmosis Jones posted in that thread so maybe that is the reason. I read his post. I should reply. I saw that you mentioned Metropolitan Avenue in another thread so pray tell when are you relocating to the area approximating Metropolitan and 116th or alternatively Yellowstone Boulevard in Queens and register as a Democrat like you told us you were going to do Things are happening. I am working LaGuardia to Denver tomorrow morning and will probably sit in my jump seat and stare straight ahead at the bulkhead wall. you need a dietary intervention yesterday. Your diet is brutal. The fact that you are a homosexual means nothing to me. I'll still help you find the right dietary path. |
|
|
| (1755522) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 15:07:47 2020, in response to IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 20:06:47 2019. Rabbi Jacobson was on The Dennis Prager Show today.I think it's time for the following Jews to reproduce: OBS Nilet Spider-Pig MTK KevinFromMidwood UnionTurnpike |
|
|
| (1755571) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Jul 28 16:06:19 2020, in response to IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 20:06:47 2019. clearaspect wishes he could mate with me. |
|
|
| (1755587) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 28 17:11:31 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Jul 28 16:06:19 2020. Why did you bump this thread? |
|
|
| (1755612) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by rkba on Tue Jul 28 18:44:20 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 15:07:47 2020. I don't think nilet will be reproducing anytime soon unless he finds someone that speaks in the same autistic screeches as he does. |
|
|
| (1755626) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 19:38:15 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by rkba on Tue Jul 28 18:44:20 2020. ? He is highly intelligent. A woman who wants smart kids will want his DNA. THIW |
|
|
| (1755629) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Jul 28 19:59:59 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 19:38:15 2020. Maybe women want success. Intelligence is just one indicator and not always the best. |
|
|
| (1755635) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 28 20:08:07 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 19:38:15 2020. Intelligence is not linked to DNA. |
|
|
| (1755636) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by rkba on Tue Jul 28 20:12:32 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 19:38:15 2020. but nobody wants their kid to be autistic. |
|
|
| (1755648) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 20:48:50 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by rkba on Tue Jul 28 20:12:32 2020. Nilet has not been diagnosed with autism.Based on his posts he has a high IQ and probably would father smart babies. That's why I bumped this thread. Dennis Prager had a rabbi on today. Smart men need to father babies. |
|
|
| (1755661) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 28 21:50:12 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 20:48:50 2020. Based on his (Nilet's) posts he has a high IQWow, did you get that way wrong, #37. |
|
|
| (1755683) | |
Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37) |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Wed Jul 29 08:26:29 2020, in response to Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37), posted by Mtk52983 on Sun Jun 9 06:37:15 2019. R-22 |
|
|
| (1755699) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Wed Jul 29 09:28:55 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 28 17:11:31 2020. He didn't. Luch (of course!) did, 59 minutes earlier. |
|
|
| (1755700) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Wed Jul 29 09:30:52 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 28 20:48:50 2020. Nilet has not been diagnosed with autism.How do you know? He did not reply to your infamous Asperger's thread, #37. |
|
|
| (1755708) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Jul 29 09:50:30 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Wed Jul 29 09:28:55 2020. But I wish I did for my line. |
|
|
| (1755753) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 29 12:20:57 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Wed Jul 29 09:28:55 2020. Shoulda known. |
|
|
| (1755756) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 29 12:23:48 2020, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Wed Jul 29 09:30:52 2020. Never mind other disorders. Mild schizophrenia, maybe?Bad enough the author of the #37 thread denies he has a condition. |
|
|
| (1755798) | |
Re: IQ 37 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 29 13:48:30 2020, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019. I said nothing about alleged wrongness. |
|
|
| (1755800) | |
Re: IQ 37 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 29 13:54:44 2020, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 29 13:48:30 2020. Stalker. |
|
|
| (1872209) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 15:30:54 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by The Silence on Sat Jun 8 09:40:25 2019. TNHIWSmart people, high IQ people aren't having kids. Look at all the high IQ dudes here who are childless. |
|
|
| (1872211) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by chicagoMotorman on Tue Dec 28 15:45:23 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 15:30:54 2021. |
|
|
| (1872212) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Dec 28 15:46:18 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 15:30:54 2021. Who are the "childless high IQ dudes" on this board? |
|
|
| (1872248) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 18:02:51 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Dec 28 15:46:18 2021. They are listed in opening post.I'm worked up because Bauman calls me Mr. LuchAAA. What a weird way to twist a handle. He definitely has a high IQ and no kids. |
|
|
| (1872253) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Tue Dec 28 18:08:08 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 18:02:51 2021. You worship the weirdest people. |
|
|
| (1872256) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 18:17:26 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Chicagomotorman on Tue Dec 28 18:08:08 2021. People with kids look down on those who don't. |
|
|
| (1872261) | |
Re: IQ 37 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Dec 28 18:31:13 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 15:30:54 2021. Smart people, high IQ people aren't having kidsIQ is irrelevant, #37. |
|
|
| (1872277) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Tue Dec 28 19:16:36 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 18:17:26 2021. True. |
|
|
| (1872279) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Dec 28 19:24:35 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Dec 28 15:46:18 2021. I have a high IQ, kids, and looks! |
|
|
| (1872293) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Dec 28 19:46:50 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by The Silence on Sat Jun 8 09:40:25 2019. Hello The Silence. Do you have a YouTube transit channel? Good work if that's you. |
|
|
| (1872296) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Dyre Dan on Tue Dec 28 20:03:18 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by The Silence on Sat Jun 8 09:40:25 2019. How often is the scoring system "renormalized" to make the average score be 100? When one person takes an IQ test, they get a score that is based on their performance alone. The person scoring the test doesn't know how everyone else who took the test that day (or that week, month, year, etc.) did, they only know how the one person they are scoring did, and they give him or her a score based on that. But if it's true that the average score is always supposed to be 100, then the scoring system must be periodically updated to reflect that, and there should be a clear record of those updates. Is there? Does it show that people in general are getting smarter, meaning a higher level of achievement than before is needed to score 100? Or does it show the opposite, or neither? Or is there in fact no such agreed-upon record at all? |
|
|
| (1872298) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Tue Dec 28 20:06:50 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 18:17:26 2021. I never have.Matter of fact I think it’s a good thing certain people don’t have kids if they don’t have their heart in being a parent. |
|
|
| (1872314) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 21:07:33 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Easy on Tue Dec 28 19:46:50 2021. What is it called? I follow about a dozen such channels. |
|
|
| (1872315) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 21:13:25 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Catfish 44 on Tue Dec 28 20:06:50 2021. I've seen how people in our age group treat friends who don't have kids.So many people had kids and wish they hadn't. |
|
|
| (1872316) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Dec 28 21:19:02 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 21:07:33 2021. I don't recall. It's the one with the woman that is cuter than I imagined The Silence to be, but I think has the same name that she once mentioned on this forum. |
|
|
| (1872317) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 21:22:51 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Easy on Tue Dec 28 21:19:02 2021. Oh. |
|
|
| (1872356) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 05:11:11 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Catfish 44 on Tue Dec 28 20:06:50 2021. another thing I notice is that many(not all) girls who are in our age range, and went to Catholic school, married well and seem to have raised quality children.I went to OLMM in Ridgewood, Queens. This was my church but I went to public school. The girls at OLMM seem more likely to marry, at a younger age. It was a very working class Catholic family oriented neighoborhood(unlike 10018 which is Baumans's favorite town these days). One is now 51 and has three boys. Another is 48 and has two boys who look like swim team captains or QB's. Their kids are in college. These women married young and married quality men to have the best chances for quality offspring. There were quality women, serious about motherhood, being a wife, raising a family. Not karaoke, yoga retreats, new tattoos, or NSA's on vacation. I'm invisible to such quality women. They would not want my offspring so I've been eliminated from the gene pool. I could have married a foreign woman with low standards who just wants an American husband, but oh well. |
|
|
| (1872358) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 06:27:19 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Dec 28 19:24:35 2021. You're a high value man. 80% of the female population would have your babies. |
|
|
| (1872361) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Wed Dec 29 06:49:01 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 28 21:13:25 2021. How do they treat them? |
|
|
| (1872362) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 06:52:05 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Catfish 44 on Wed Dec 29 06:49:01 2021. Sometimes a comment "you don't have kids".Or they just stop being friends. Especially the women. |
|
|
| (1872363) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 06:54:17 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Catfish 44 on Wed Dec 29 06:49:01 2021. Also older couples over 35 have more girls.If they have boys there is more likelihood of autism although it's being diagnosed in girls at higher rates than before. |
|
|
| (1872365) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Wed Dec 29 07:16:18 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 06:52:05 2021. That’s a shame |
|
|
| (1872373) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Dec 29 08:53:54 2021, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 29 06:27:19 2021. Don't I know it! 🤣😅 |
|
|
| (1886936) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 19 19:03:10 2022, in response to IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 20:06:47 2019. There is a reason Nilet and a few other high IQ dudes here haven't reproduced.Their IQ is so high they have big brains, thus big heads, no woman wants to have to squeeze a big headed baby through her birth canal. Too painful. |
|
|
| (1886937) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Sat Feb 19 19:06:41 2022, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 21:44:28 2019. That makes you smarter than most people. |
|
|
| (1886941) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Sat Feb 19 19:39:50 2022, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 21:44:28 2019. Luch, despite our differences of opinions, I do admire your honesty! |
|
|
| (1886942) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sat Feb 19 19:42:57 2022, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 19 19:03:10 2022. "no woman wants to have to squeeze a big headed baby through her birth canal. Too painful."I've heard its like a man passing a kidney stone. |
|
|
| (1886944) | |
Re: IQ 83 |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Feb 19 19:45:03 2022, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 19 19:03:10 2022. Like Stewie from Family Guy |
|
|
| (1886945) | |
Re: IQ 83? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Feb 19 20:08:56 2022, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 19 19:03:10 2022. B7 #37. Get lost, liberal troll.BTW, the number in the title thread is your IQ and Nilet's combined. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||