Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 6

Next Page >  

(1630387)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Express Rider on Thu Jun 6 21:37:16 2019, in response to Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jun 6 17:14:41 2019.

did your parents read Westbrook Pegler newspaper columns to you instead of bedtime stories? Was someone like that manophere jerk Elan a Scoutmaster of yours?

or maybe this whole post is a put-on?

Post a New Response

(1630390)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 02:06:55 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Thu Jun 6 21:37:16 2019.

You are responding to someone with an IQ of 37, why bother?

Post a New Response

(1630392)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by AlM on Fri Jun 7 02:52:57 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Thu Jun 6 21:37:16 2019.

Westbrook Pegler

That's a name I haven't heard in a very long time.




Post a New Response

(1630395)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 03:26:51 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Thu Jun 6 21:37:16 2019.

Stop feeding the troll.

Post a New Response

(1630397)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by TransitChuckG on Fri Jun 7 03:28:03 2019, in response to Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jun 6 17:14:41 2019.

I'm sorry , LuchAAA, but I totally disagree with your findings, about women being useless.

Post a New Response

(1630440)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 7 05:35:54 2019, in response to Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jun 6 17:14:41 2019.

Gheyest post you've ever made. Now it's time to reveal your BF's name.

Post a New Response

(1630446)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Jun 7 05:54:00 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 02:06:55 2019.

LOL

Post a New Response

(1630453)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 7 05:35:54 2019.

Nothing wrong with being gay. Everything wrong with being Luch.

Post a New Response

(1630460)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 06:39:15 2019, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019.

IAWTP. And if LGBT want to be as disappointed in marriage as straight people, more business for me!

Post a New Response

(1630461)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 06:39:15 2019, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019.

IAWTP. And if LGBT want to be as disappointed in marriage as straight people, more business for me!

Post a New Response

(1630469)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Jun 7 07:03:43 2019, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019.

LMAO

Post a New Response

(1630470)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Jun 7 07:05:05 2019, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 06:39:15 2019.



Post a New Response

(1630510)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Express Rider on Fri Jun 7 09:50:33 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 03:26:51 2019.

point taken.
Thank you!

Post a New Response

(1630511)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Express Rider on Fri Jun 7 09:52:14 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jun 7 02:06:55 2019.

yeah, you're right....
why bother is the best advice...

Post a New Response

(1630512)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Express Rider on Fri Jun 7 10:02:23 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by AlM on Fri Jun 7 02:52:57 2019.

He was definately before my time.
I only found out about him because I was helping to clean out the basement of a store front, and there were boxes of old local newspapers (Easton, PA) from the late 1940s. Looking through them, I came across a number of Pegler's columns. Reading them I thought, is this guy for real? His stuff was so off the wall sarcastic, mean spirited and small minded....

My Dad rolled his eyes with an "Oh-My-God" expression on his face when I told him about the Pegler columns I found

who knows, if Pegler were still around he might even be too weird for Fox news.


Post a New Response

(1630513)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 10:05:20 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Fri Jun 7 10:02:23 2019.

I'm on my way to Whole Foods happy hour. Will formally respond to all this later.

Post a New Response

(1630541)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 13:06:42 2019, in response to Re: IQ 37, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 06:33:37 2019.

No more calls, folks. We have us a winnah!

Post a New Response

(1630563)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 14:50:53 2019, in response to Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jun 6 17:14:41 2019.

No one could even deny it. Men are waking up.

Post a New Response

(1630574)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 16:33:15 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Thu Jun 6 21:37:16 2019.

thanks for the w1n. I needed it.

Post a New Response

(1630591)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 19:08:27 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Express Rider on Fri Jun 7 09:52:14 2019.

Now you know why I suggested not feeding the troll.

Post a New Response

(1630592)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 19:09:04 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 16:33:15 2019.

What you need is psychiatric help.

Post a New Response

(1630596)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 19:33:08 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 19:09:04 2019.

You know he really needs some help. A regular psychiatrist couldn't even help him. He needs to go to like Vienna or something. You know what I mean? He needs to get involved at the university level. Like where Freud studied and have all those people looking at him and checking up on him. That's the kind of help he needs. Not the once a week for eighty bucks, no. He needs a team. A team of psychiatrists working round the clock thinking about him, having conferences, observing him, like the way they did with the Elephant Man. That's what I'm talking about because that's the only way he’s going to get better.

Post a New Response

(1630599)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 19:38:17 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 19:33:08 2019.

I want to go to Vienna, Rome and two other cities this year.

Oh, thanks for attacking. You can't debate my valid points so you attack me. This confirms what I already know. That I speak the truth.

Post a New Response

(1630606)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 20:01:58 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 19:33:08 2019.

Excellent points, all.

Post a New Response

(1630609)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 20:04:58 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 19:38:17 2019.

Yes, but are you master of your domain?

Post a New Response

(1630611)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 20:11:45 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 20:04:58 2019.

Does he have a square to spare?

Post a New Response

(1630613)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 20:16:25 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Dave on Fri Jun 7 20:11:45 2019.

That's lewd, lascivious, salacious, outrageous!

Post a New Response

(1630614)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by Kevin from Midwood on Fri Jun 7 20:25:26 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 7 05:35:54 2019.

Meh. His post reads like a philistine’s version of “La donna è mobile.”

Post a New Response

(1630615)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 20:44:05 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by Kevin from Midwood on Fri Jun 7 20:25:26 2019.

thanks KFM, the responses to me in depth analysis prove that I'm right.

Post a New Response

(1630624)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jun 8 03:14:59 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 20:16:25 2019.

I LOVE the Seinfeld references! Larry David is the BEST comedic genius EVER in modern times, perhaps of all time. I make it a rule not to eat or drink while watching Curb Your Enthusiasm because I don't want to die from choking on my food from laughing.

Post a New Response

(1630627)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 8 03:33:08 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jun 7 20:44:05 2019.

Confirmation bias is a logical fallacy, not proof of anything, #37.

Post a New Response

(1630630)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 8 03:36:10 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jun 8 03:14:59 2019.

Nah.

Post a New Response

(1630663)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Edwards! on Sat Jun 8 05:41:30 2019, in response to Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jun 6 17:14:41 2019.

Whatever works for you,dude.


Post a New Response

(1630671)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Jun 8 06:33:23 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by bingbong on Fri Apr 19 11:35:50 2019.

I'd have to agree with you on this one, at least considering 1 or 2 names on there. More interesting would be what would be willing to mate with a name or 2 on there...

Post a New Response

(1630675)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 8 06:55:59 2019, in response to Re: IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jun 3 12:54:01 2019.

. . . says the guy who still insists GheyMengele is some sort of genius.

Post a New Response

(1630686)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Bill Newkirk on Sat Jun 8 07:16:46 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jun 7 19:33:08 2019.

A team of psychiatrists working round the clock thinking about him, having conferences, observing him, like the way they did with the Elephant Man. That's what I'm talking about because that's the only way he’s going to get better.

That team would hit a roadblock when they find out his obession with R 27's.

Bill Newkirk




Post a New Response

(1630751)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 09:02:11 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Bill Newkirk on Sat Jun 8 07:16:46 2019.

R 27's are one thing I meditate to.



Post a New Response

(1630758)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 09:07:22 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Bill Newkirk on Sat Jun 8 07:16:46 2019.

Oh thanks for agreeing about women.

Post a New Response

(1630780)

view threaded

Re: IQ 83

Posted by The Silence on Sat Jun 8 09:40:25 2019, in response to IQ 83, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 18 20:06:47 2019.

OK, that is not how IQs work.

IQ is an average in and of itself. a person with an IQ that is 100 is average. the IQ scores are going down because, by the design of the system, 100 MUST be the average. If your IQ was 100 and it's dropped to 85 or whatever, nothing has changed about you, but instead OTHER PEOPLE got SMARTER.

In order to imply society is getting dumber, your IQ needs to go UP.


Post a New Response

(1630828)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Bill Newkirk on Sat Jun 8 12:15:11 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 09:07:22 2019.

I'm neutral.

Bill Newkirk

Post a New Response

(1630830)

view threaded

Re: IQ 37

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 8 12:20:20 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Bill Newkirk on Sat Jun 8 12:15:11 2019.

Not if you respond to him, lol.

Post a New Response

(1630888)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Jun 8 18:23:17 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 09:02:11 2019.

Just R-27s? No R-30s?

Post a New Response

(1630890)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 18:26:13 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Jun 8 18:23:17 2019.

Yes.

Post a New Response

(1630892)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by cortelyounext on Sat Jun 8 19:38:17 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 18:26:13 2019.

Did you see Osmosis Jones posted on the other board? Your aviation thread was unnecessary and uncalled for and served no useful purpose. I worked Vancouver to Chicago to New York today - I sat in the jumpseat facing backwards and stared straight ahead at the wall for the most part.

Post a New Response

(1630893)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 19:40:57 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by cortelyounext on Sat Jun 8 19:38:17 2019.

Did you hawk/stawk anyone to figure out who's a sex tourist?

No aviation thread is uncalled for.

#aviation

Post a New Response

(1630899)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by Bill Newkirk on Sun Jun 9 02:27:01 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 18:26:13 2019.

image host

Post a New Response

(1630905)

view threaded

Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83)

Posted by TransitChuckG on Sun Jun 9 03:48:01 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by Bill Newkirk on Sun Jun 9 02:27:01 2019.

Much better!

Post a New Response

(1630915)

view threaded

Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37)

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 9 06:36:10 2019, in response to Re: Women are basically useless(Re: IQ 83), posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 8 18:26:13 2019.



Post a New Response

(1630916)

view threaded

Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37)

Posted by Mtk52983 on Sun Jun 9 06:37:15 2019, in response to Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37), posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 9 06:36:10 2019.

That isn't an R27

Post a New Response

(1630917)

view threaded

Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37)

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 9 06:38:15 2019, in response to Re: R27s are basically useless (Re: IQ 37), posted by Mtk52983 on Sun Jun 9 06:37:15 2019.

That's OK. It's a good reflection of the inside of Luch's mind.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 6

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]