|
|
| Re: Seriously? (1255827) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
|
| (1256873) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jan 14 06:20:10 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jan 14 06:16:35 2015. There was the case of the unarmed Utah teen shot by the black cop. Nothing in the main stream media. |
|
|
| (1256875) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 14 06:33:22 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:43 2015. That doesn't make sense. I have a wallet too. I might be the next person killed for that reason. |
|
|
| (1256886) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Jan 14 07:43:58 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 14 06:33:22 2015. The problem is, he and his type are at the opposite extreme. If a white person is killed for his wallet, he was killed for his wallet. If a Black person is killed for his wallet, he was killed because he was Black. |
|
|
| (1256893) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:34:14 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:28 2015. they don't have any problems with me.Seriously doubt it. |
|
|
| (1256895) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:42:14 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:30 2015. How do you know he's never seen you? You're not hard to miss. |
|
|
| (1256896) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:43:52 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:32 2015. Since when do I trust "Dave, Bill, Chris (sometimes both), Train Dude and Olog"????? WTF????????????????YOU, OTOH, trust obvious trolls. |
|
|
| (1256897) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:44:29 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:35 2015. ...says the person who got fired from a mail roomProff? because he can't act like an adult for five minutes.Proff? |
|
|
| (1256898) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:44:47 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:37 2015. Proff? |
|
|
| (1256900) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:47:57 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:39 2015. Yes. You did.Really? Are you sure? that breakdown you had a few years agoSelkirkTMO is an asshole antisemite. demanded Larry delete large numbers of threadsHuh? claimed I "betrayed" youWell you did, duh. You smugly declare that you doubt I have a job when you can't hold down even a simple job yourself.My smugness has nothing to do with this. I doubt you have a respectable job. Luckily, my paycheckYEs, if you get one, you are lucky, because you are one f*******cked up person. |
|
|
| (1256901) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:48:28 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:43 2015. WTF????????? |
|
|
| (1256903) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:51:14 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:26:51 2015. Nope! You lose. Your punishment is 10 minutes in the shower with SelkirkTMO or Edwards!. Yes, I know you're not gay. That's the point. |
|
|
| (1257104) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 21:57:30 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jan 14 06:14:14 2015. Don't confuse the sheeple with facts! |
|
|
| (1257106) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:03:03 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Jan 14 07:43:58 2015. You mean like if I say a when a white criminal who was killed by police deserved it then I'm just pro-police but when the police kill a black criminal and I say he deserved it, then I must hate all black people and advocate their genocide? |
|
|
| (1257108) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:05:54 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:32 2015. Can't you see that you're just a douche who lives in his own little world? WE CAN. |
|
|
| (1257109) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:07:02 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:42:14 2015. How does he look like, may I ask? Doesn't he have longish hair? |
|
|
| (1257119) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Wed Jan 14 22:32:57 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:07:02 2015. He did the last time I saw him, IINM. |
|
|
| (1257132) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 15 00:20:24 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Nilet on Wed Jan 14 00:11:43 2015. Alfred E. Neuman School of Philosophy? |
|
|
| (1257166) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:04:58 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:44:47 2015. Proff. |
|
|
| (1257167) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:00 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jan 14 06:14:14 2015. Disproportionately? 350 people died at the hands of police and 123 of those were black. Statistically, that ain't many.Or in other words, about 35% of the people killed by police were black. Only about 12% of the population is black. Statistically, that's disproportionate. |
|
|
| (1257173) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:17 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 04:50:24 2015. Good. Since we agree, this point is now settled.Q.E.D. (1) I don't actually mock people for double posting as a matter of course, but (2) I make an exception in your case because you're an asshole. |
|
|
| (1257174) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:19 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:44:29 2015. ...says the person who got fired from a mail room...Proff? Proff. ... because he can't act like an adult for five minutes. Proff? Proff. And I can offer a dozen more links to this one if you want them. |
|
|
| (1257175) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:21 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:43:52 2015. Since when do I trust "Dave, Bill, Chris (sometimes both), Train Dude and Olog"????? WTF????????????????I never said you did. You claimed that I did, and I pointed out that describing someone as a brain damaged toddler is not usually considered an indicator of trust. Please do learn how to read and/or write. YOU, OTOH, trust obvious trolls. I just disproved this nonsense above, but it clearly went right over your head. |
|
|
| (1257176) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:24 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:05:54 2015. Can't you see that you're just a douche who lives in his own little world? WE CAN. |
|
|
| (1257177) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:26 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:42:14 2015. How do you know he's never seen you?I tend to know who I've met and who I haven't. If I met someone who acts like him, I'd remember it. As would the cops, in all likelihood. |
|
|
| (1257178) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:29 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:51:14 2015. Nope! You lose.We'll let LuchAAA decide. You can't be a boxer and a referee. Your punishment is 10 minutes in the shower with SelkirkTMO or Edwards!. That doesn't sound too bad. Ten seconds of my singing and they'll run the other way. Yes, I know you're not gay. That's the point. That's not much of a point. I'm a liberal, remember? That makes me immune to anxious masculinity bullshit. |
|
|
| (1257179) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:32 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jan 14 08:47:57 2015. Really? Are you sure?Yep. SelkirkTMO is an asshole antisemite. Because he mentioned you were fired? Huh? Are you claiming you deleted them? Well you did, duh. In what way? You never managed to explain. My smugness has nothing to do with this. No, it's because you're an asshole "antisemite." I doubt you have a respectable job. Whether it's "respectable" is a matter of opinion. It pays the bills though and the flexible hours are nice. YEs, if you get one, you are lucky, because you are one fuuuuuuucked up person. Says the autistic manchild who can't hold down a job. |
|
|
| (1257180) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:34 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 04:48:30 2015. Black people walking down the street ARE more likely to be shot than white people.......By other blacks!Whinging: "BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE!!!" is another racist tactic, so nice job not helping your case there. Most of the time, the white criminals DON'T want to get shot so they listen to whomever is telling them to stop and drop the weapons they have instead of trying to be "gangsta" and defy the powers that be. Ah, so you're claiming black people are more likely to be killed because black people are unintelligent/suicidal/hardened criminals. You are so helping your case here! Look how that worked out for Brown and Garner! NEITHER OF WHOM WERE ARMED. Are you telling me they wouldn't have been killed if only they'd dropped the weapons they didn't have? I assume that you are over 25 years old. So you KNOW the answer to your last question. You know it, I know it, we ALL know it. My last question was this: Why does having darker skin make you so much more likely to be killed by the police? You're right, I know the answer— but you clearly don't; you "know" some racist bullshit and are hoping that winking and nudging might save you from having to say it out loud. So I ask again: Why does having darker skin make you so much more likely to be killed by the police? And like I said, look it up (the Pink Houses shooting) Your argument, you defend it. |
|
|
| (1257181) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:36 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:03:03 2015. You mean like if I say a when a white criminal who was killed by police deserved it...When have you said this? If you'd actually said it, you know, ever then you might be able to defend the claim that you're merely naive and/or an authoritarian rather than a racist. |
|
|
| (1257182) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:38 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 14 06:33:22 2015. But wallet-havers are not currently or historically oppressed and no one will kill you for the primary purpose of sending a message to other wallet-havers that their type isn't welcome here. |
|
|
| (1257183) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:40 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Jan 14 07:43:58 2015. The whole point of hate crime laws is that they impose a stronger penalty if you attack someone because of their membership in a historically oppressed group. If a black person is killed for his wallet, he was killed for his wallet— it's not a hate crime unless the prosecutor can prove he was killed because he was black (and the wallet was incidental).Or do you seriously think that lynchings were not motivated by hatred of black people in particular, or that they didn't serve to terrify anyone with dark skin? |
|
|
| (1257184) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:43 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 04:44:14 2015. 1. Exactly.So you're admitting I'm right now? Good. 2. First off, your deductions are not logical, NOR are they correct. Look, just because you can't understand simple logic doesn't make it wrong. 3. The links that you post do not prove your point at ALL. In fact, it's quite the contrary. See (2). 4. Link all you want. Indeed I will. I'm quite happy to prove you wrong. You're my little bitch so if it makes you feel better that you want to be riding my nutsack, so be it. Why is every gay man on SubChat fantasising about fucking me? Yes, I'm handsome and all, but I'm also not gay. Our orientations are not compatible. Go find someone else before I ask Larry to ban you for sexual harassment. Of course I like women (an alien concept to you) You have just demonstrated that liking women is an alien concept to you. Even if you're bisexual rather than gay, that is— since you seem to think of women as objects, I doubt anyone would make the argument that your feelings towards women are at all positive. And like I said, your links will not prove anything as usual. Or in other words, your response is and continues to be: "NUH-UH!" 5. Yeah. I kinda figured that you wouldn't know what a chick was, besides the literal meaning. Actually, I was giving you one chance to prove that you weren't a sexist as well as a racist. You failed. Congratulations. You are a despicable failure of a human. Your trophy is through that door marked: "Totally not a euthanasia room!" 6. I mean what I write. No hidden meanings. Only YOU think there are. Necessary logical consequences are not hidden meanings. If you respond to a shooting with a black shooter by calling him a "savage" but respond to a shooting with a black victim by calling the victim a savage, then you are a racist. By definition. That's just what the word means. Don't tell me you're pulling an Olog and I need to ask you to define "racist" now. 7. Are you kidding me? Michael Brown was a strong-arm robber who had just done just that before Wilson drove up upon him. That's a lie. The fact that you make up lies about black murder victims to justify their murderers further proves that you're a racist. If you wish to reassert the truth of this claim, make sure it's accompanied by proof, probably using one of those link thingies you hate so much. And, of course, in true criminal fashion, he had to mouth off and fight Wilson as well. Another lie. The fact that you tell these lies further proves that you're a racist. Tamir Rice shouldn't have been pointing the airsoft pistol at people, thus prompting people to call 911 and then the police dispatcher having to give out the call as someone with a gun pointing it at people. Tamir making a hand gesture toward his waist sealed his fate. More lies— I already posted a video disproving these. The fact that you think it was justified for the police to shoot a young child further proves that you're a racist— unless you want to point to all the white kids shot by the cops that you think are equally justified. I never discussed Oscar Grant, so why should I do it now, because you told me to? Or in other words, you're glad he was killed but you're worried the facts are a bit too unambiguous for you to lie through. Come on, we already know you're a racist— do you think Oscar Grant should have been killed? Yes or no? Nigga please! And now you're using racial slurs. Congratulations. You are a racist. This fact is now beyond the slightest doubt. It's been fun; don't let the door hit you as you slink off the stage. Where did I discuss white killers with black victims? Um, this very paragraph? Michael Brown? Tamir Rice? Oscar Grant? I discussed police (race irrelevant) having to utilize DPF against assailants (race irrelevant). Except that when the killers are black, you call them "savages" and when the killers are white, you defend them. You see how this works? Jim Crow voting laws never mentioned race— they said that people, race irrelevant, had to meet a set of criteria in order to vote, none of which were "being white." You see how this works? Or are you planning to claim that Jim Fucking Crow wasn't racist? And what about the killing from 2013 of the guy who thankfully got mowed down before he caould shoot a cop? Which killing are you referring to? 8. Yes, black people are criminals. Not all of them. White people are criminals. Not all of them. Asian people are criminals. Not all of them. Hispanic people are criminals. Not all of them. So why are black people disproportionately likely to be in prison? Why are black people disproportionately likely to be killed by the police? BTW, YOU calling me a racist has ABSOLUTELY no bearing on my life. No, but you won't be able to find a job if you act like this in public. 9. For Christ's Sake look it up. It's your argument. I pointed out that you have yet to claim that the police were unjustified in shooting a black person— if you want to offer a counterexample, that's your responsibility; I have no intention of defending a despicable fuckstain like you. |
|
|
| (1257218) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:23:41 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:04:58 2015. LOL! Thanks for that! |
|
|
| (1257235) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:39:38 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:21 2015. I never said you did. You claimed that I did, and I pointed out that describing someone as a brain damaged toddler is not usually considered an indicator of trust.My mistake. I see what you mean now. I just disproved this nonsense above, but it clearly went right over your head.No you didn't. You skirted the issue. You trust obvious trolls, such as RAY JULES. |
|
|
| (1257237) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:40:55 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:19 2015. How is the first link proff? Do you understand context and nuance?How is the second link proff? |
|
|
| (1257239) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:43:33 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:26 2015. Why does he have to have "met" you to have "seen" you? There are plenty of railfans that I've seen on many fan trips but have never actually formally met.And what does what one types here have to do with how one acts on a fan trip? What do written words and physical actions necessarily have to do with each other? And why in the world would cops be involved? |
|
|
| (1257244) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:45:33 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:29 2015. Fair enough, but you do seem to get bothered when people post, what in your mind are, gay references, to you. |
|
|
| (1257251) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:52:11 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:32 2015. Yep.Ok. So since it seems you're only taking my word for it, if I now tell you that I wasn't fired from the mail room, you will immediately believe me? Because he mentioned you were fired?Because he told everyone. And for other stuff too. Are you claiming you deleted them?I've certainly never claimed that. But others have. But no, that's not what the "huh" refers to. Try again. In what way? You never managed to explain.I've answered you countless times and told you that you typed here the exact reason in one or more of your mentions of this topic. Whether it's "respectable" is a matter of opinion.Exactly, thank you. It pays the bills though and the flexible hours are nice.What kind of bills do you have? And if it is flexible, how come IIRC you said something about not being able to attend some event because of work? can't hold down a job.Proff? |
|
|
| (1257256) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Jan 15 11:02:09 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by TERRApin Station on Thu Jan 15 10:45:33 2015. Sometimes when people aren't confident in their sexuality, that happens. |
|
|
| (1257257) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Jan 15 11:04:47 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:07:02 2015. Don't know now of course, and it's been a very long time, but when I have seen him, he had long greasy hair, and was hard to miss. |
|
|
| (1257337) | |
Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 14:49:33 2015, in response to Re: I Need An Opinion From Selkirk, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:36 2015. I've said it before several times, including the Salt Lake City case. You just choose to ignore that. Do you even know the meaning of authoritarian? Siding with the police when they usher out a miscreant does NOT mean that.Now go get your fuckin' shinebox! |
|
|
| (1257338) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 14:50:25 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:24 2015. That's what I figured.. Biter... |
|
|
| (1257339) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 14:51:21 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jan 14 22:07:02 2015. Thanks. I assume he has that "eccentric" look to him? |
|
|
| (1257349) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:34:28 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:43 2015. Reading this here while I'm at work actually gave me a chuckle. It gives me a real inside on how the dememented mind works.BTW, I've been working in my current agency for many years, so yeah, I think I do not have to worry about finding a job. Again, it was all over the news about 4 weeks ago. Someone got shot in the stairwell in the Pink Houses by a rookie Asain cop. The guy who got shot's name begins with an A. Now be a good detective and get to work! (If you know what that means) Why ARE more blacks in prison percentagewise? Because they are more than likely repeat offenders. Since percentagewise more blacks commit violent crimes, it should only make sense that they come in contact with the police more often and since many blacks who are criminals come from broken homes, they have a problem with authority so they are more likely to engage the police, thus getting shot in the process. YOU linked me to the 2013 shooting of some mope by the police, so I assumed that you wanted to drivel on about that! I never defended a white killer before in my life! BTW, good police shootings don't make the white cops "killers" if that's what you're referring to. It's 2015. Jim Crow laws are over. Get with the times. Oscar Grant should not have been shot with a firearm. However, his actions are partly why the cop was trying to reach for his taser in the first place. Why would I be glad that he was killed. That's a big assumption on your part, no? Nigga please is not a racist term. All the crap you posted about Tamir and Michael and how I'm lying and about the video. Well, I suggest that you watch them. This time with your eyes open. |
|
|
| (1257350) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jan 15 15:35:03 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:34:28 2015. bullshit ! |
|
|
| (1257352) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:36:06 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:34:28 2015. I call broads chicks. So what? They seem to like it.BTW, stop biting my lines. Cry to whomever you want like a cur. |
|
|
| (1257355) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jan 15 15:43:05 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:34:28 2015. black people do not do all the crime in white ameriKKKa ! |
|
|
| (1257357) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:55:20 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jan 15 15:35:03 2015. What is? |
|
|
| (1257358) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 15:55:41 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Jan 15 15:43:05 2015. Never said they did! |
|
|
| (1257362) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 16:01:06 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:00 2015. Then stop doing a disproportionate amount of crimes and it wouldn't happen as often. Simple as that. |
|
|
| (1257364) | |
Re: Seriously? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jan 15 16:03:41 2015, in response to Re: Seriously?, posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 15 09:05:17 2015. I can't WAIT..... |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||