|
|
| Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) (1207727) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 4 |
||
|
| (1208198) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jul 28 11:32:45 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 10:32:35 2014. And that makes it better? |
|
|
| (1208202) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 11:40:28 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jul 28 11:32:45 2014. Who said that? It only serves to dictate the level of expected discussion.Ater all, if we wee to discuss theories as to why some people re gay, we'd have to include discussions involving science, which someone who can't fathom something as simply obvious as evolution could have zero hope of comprehending immunoantigonists effects on mitochondrial DNA, one conjectured concept. They'd never get it. |
|
|
| (1208287) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 13:58:29 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 10:31:50 2014. SO then you were not mocking her policies as you first claimed. So then you believe that if anyone disagrees with a woman for any reason it's perfectly fair to mock her appearance or her sexuality. And yet you say that there is no war against women by the left. |
|
|
| (1208288) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 14:00:42 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 10:32:35 2014. If that is true, why not criticize the behavior instead of repeating it? |
|
|
| (1208313) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Mon Jul 28 15:18:44 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 13:58:29 2014. "So then you believe that if anyone disagrees with a woman for any reason it's perfectly fair to mock her appearance or her sexuality."Idiot boy....you're losing this battle....you want to know why? you are defending an anti-gay person who would make rather deny rights to the LGBTQ community than to support them. Bachmann is a religious extremist....is that what you want to support? she another that wants a CHIRSTIAN nation and anyone else can leave attitude. |
|
|
| (1208333) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 16:42:17 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 13:58:29 2014. She is too closely identified with those policies. Had she handled selling those policies differently, she'd be looked at differently. Okay, maybe not since they're borderline gibberish. Face it, it is what it is. Insanity like that isn't going to engender respect. |
|
|
| (1208334) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 16:44:05 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 14:00:42 2014. It is true. Maybe they ought to start with decent treatment of one's fellow humans coupled with some sane policy. That might help. Oh wait...... |
|
|
| (1208336) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 16:52:55 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 16:42:17 2014. What does all this have to do with you attacking her for her appearance or people posting photos with lewd sexual comments about her? |
|
|
| (1208352) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 18:22:08 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 28 16:52:55 2014. What appearance attack is this? That she looks like she could be Batboy's mother? Do you actually believe that's serious???You actually *believe* in Batboy?!?!?!? Bwahahahahahah!,,,, |
|
|
| (1208407) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 01:38:01 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 18:22:08 2014. I believe that you said it to be a malicious & vindictive and jealous woman who is resentful of a more attractive, more successful and more fulfilled woman. And now you are once again back peddling your inappropriate comments because even you see them for what they are. |
|
|
| (1208412) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Jul 29 03:40:16 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 01:38:01 2014. Yes they're all jealous of a whack job like Michele Bachmann.Calling Bachmann an idiot doesn't constitute a war on women. It's just plain common sense :) Your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1208415) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 07:39:36 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 01:38:01 2014. No that is not what I said. Why would anyone be jealous of a nutcase?Not to mention Bahmann is a failure. She failed to succeed in her pursuit of a Presidential nomination. Seems her policy "ideas" wee a little too nutty even for the RWNBs. Plus there were campaigns crimes that may splash on her in the end, and nobody wants to run a crook. Nothing to be "jealous"of here. |
|
|
| (1208416) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 07:40:33 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Fred G on Tue Jul 29 03:40:16 2014. That's absolutely correct. |
|
|
| (1208430) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 09:10:42 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Fred G on Tue Jul 29 03:40:16 2014. I disagree with your assessment of Michelle Bachman but you are certainly entitled to your opinion about her much the same way I believe similarly about Nancy Pelosi. However, while you are basing it on Bachman's politics, etc, bingbong is attacking her because of her appearance. That is a far different kind of attack. |
|
|
| (1208435) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 09:25:06 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 07:39:36 2014. No you are certainly back peddling your comments as you usually end up doing. That she (Bachman) may have failed in her pursuit of a presidential nomination only puts her in a class with women like Hillary Clinton. What does that have to do with you, though? The same can be said about your attacks on Sarah Palin. Of course, you could have limited your attacks to their politics but you chose to mock their appearance and in Palin's case, her family, instead.Michelle Bachman is certainly more successful than you are. Arguably. she is more attractive and having a husband and 5 children and 23 foster children, she certainly has a fulfilling life as a woman. |
|
|
| (1208488) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 10:48:22 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 09:25:06 2014. Given that you have no idea what I look like, and you concept of successful living is dubious at best, I'd say you're just making up shitAnd you have very little taste. |
|
|
| (1208534) | |
Re: The socialist War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by kew gardens teleport on Tue Jul 29 13:32:15 2014, in response to The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 27 11:36:20 2014. Just because crappy swear filters won't let through the true description of their ideology shouldn't let illiberals misappropriate the word "liberal". |
|
|
| (1208537) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 13:39:56 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 10:48:22 2014. Of course I know what you look like albeit before your alleged 40 Lb. weight loss. But of course, now you'll try to shift the discussion away from your "in very poor taste" comments of Michelle Bachman. as yu usually do, but this time, I'm not playing that game. |
|
|
| (1208548) | |
Re: The Liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 29 14:12:59 2014, in response to Re: The socialist War on Real Women, posted by kew gardens teleport on Tue Jul 29 13:32:15 2014. The left has appropriated "liberal" since the 19th Century. Bit too late now. |
|
|
| (1208551) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 15:17:33 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 13:39:56 2014. No, you're the one with the poor taste if you find her, as you admit, attractive. Can't change the facts. |
|
|
| (1208558) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by The Silence on Tue Jul 29 15:38:47 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Jul 27 11:41:36 2014. ...people in glass houses... |
|
|
| (1208559) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by The Silence on Tue Jul 29 15:42:13 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 28 16:44:05 2014. decent treatment of one's fellow humanssomething you know nothing of and therefor should not demand of anyone else. |
|
|
| (1208572) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by train dude on Tue Jul 29 16:38:47 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 15:17:33 2014. You just continue to make the same mistake over and over again. Her politics have nothing to do with her appearance. I find her and ms palin's appearance easier on the eye than yours. Nothing to do with your politics either. |
|
|
| (1208577) | |
Re: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now? |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jul 29 17:14:47 2014, in response to Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?, posted by streetcarman1 on Sat Jul 26 21:15:40 2014. Earlier this week, Bachmann hinted at another presidential run, criticizing the media for excluding her from 2016 speculation.PLEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAASE! “The only thing that the media has speculated on is that it’s going to be various men that are running,” I think I briefly heard about a Hillary somethingorother running. I guess it could be a man's name. And "media" is plural. |
|
|
| (1208579) | |
Re: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 29 17:19:51 2014, in response to Re: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jul 29 17:14:47 2014. PLEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAASE!Liberals don't like a good fight. You, RIPTA42, are a liberal. |
|
|
|
| (1208586) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 18:19:56 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by train dude on Tue Jul 29 16:38:47 2014. Another example of the lind leading the blind, I see.Ttheir politics are so ugly looks can never conquer them. But you'll keep making the same mistake over and over again by endorsing their hate. |
|
|
| (1208600) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 19:06:57 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by The Silence on Tue Jul 29 15:42:13 2014. That's something I know far far more about that the RWers do. Cutting funding 65% for housing disabled retirees, a large minority of whom are veterans, cutting food programs for children is NOT decent treatment of fellow human beings. Yet those are two examples of what the RWer in Washington has done to our fellow Americans.STFU. YOU have idea what your cronies are doing. Your ignorance is astounding.They are ruining lives. |
|
|
| (1208604) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 19:30:15 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 18:19:56 2014. There you go again - trying to change the debate. I endorsed nothing. I said that I found Michelle Bachman & Sarah Palin more attractive than I find you. That has nothing to do with their politics but you continue to prove my point. You equate a difference in political view with their perceived appearance. |
|
|
| (1208606) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 19:45:51 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 19:06:57 2014. You need to slow down when you get angry, BB. Your "Jibber-rate" is increasing - exponentially. |
|
|
| (1208609) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 20:06:27 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 19:30:15 2014. Yes you did. You endorsed them in any way. Since they're women, you think the most superficial is important which betrays your misogyny. |
|
|
| (1208610) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 20:07:15 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 19:45:51 2014. I'm not angry. |
|
|
| (1208611) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 20:18:31 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 20:06:27 2014. You were the one who made Michelle Bachman looks the issue, bingy. You are the one who posted the unflattering picture of Michelle Bachman and said that you were criticizing her policies. You've proven my point, bingy. Any further denials are futile and only further prove my point. Yes, I think Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin are better looking than you are. BUT that in no way means that I endorse or repudiate their politics. I think nancy pelosi is better looking than you are, as well! |
|
|
| (1208612) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 20:28:03 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 20:18:31 2014. Had she not posed unflatteringly those pictures wouldn't exist. Too bad.Fact is, the contrast between the feasibility of the pictures vs the feasibility of her "policy ideas" is laughable. The photo stands as a critique of her politics. It's equally nutty. What you ought to worry about is your support, tait or intentionally embraced, for her "policy ideas". They are wrong and scientifically proven wrong. Oh wait....you're a RWer. No science need apply. |
|
|
| (1208666) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 22:49:51 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 20:28:03 2014. You always always seem to blame your bad behavior on others - much like using the term. "Teabaggers". Are you incapable of showing some adult judgement and behavior on your own? |
|
|
| (1208678) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 23:06:08 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 22:49:51 2014. If I was to permit your "logic" credence, there'd have to have been some variety of bad behavior on my part. Since there has not been, the entire issue is moot. |
|
|
| (1208682) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 23:13:45 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 29 23:06:08 2014. That's a large part of the problem. You refuse to accept responsibility for your own poor behavior. |
|
|
| (1208713) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 00:07:51 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by The Silence on Tue Jul 29 17:33:27 2014. the problem here is you are replacing your opinion with facts.Maybe that's "a" problem but "the" problem here is that streetcarman1 is a moron. |
|
|
| (1208722) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 02:50:38 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 23:13:45 2014. That's because there is no "poor behavior". |
|
|
| (1208725) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 30 03:06:38 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 02:50:38 2014. I dunno ... he sure seems to score often. :) |
|
|
| (1208730) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 03:18:55 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 30 03:06:38 2014. Him, yes. Very. None on my part, though. |
|
|
| (1208741) | |
Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 30 03:47:44 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 03:18:55 2014. I get a kick out of watching you turn him all "whiny librul" ... :) |
|
|
| (1208773) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 30 08:40:32 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by The Silence on Tue Jul 29 17:33:27 2014. Other than this being a total waste because you are responding to streetcarman, you make some valid points.There are numerous genetic conditions which should not exist, and yet they do, and they are genetic conditions without question. Sufferers of Tay-Sachs disease do not live long enough to pass on their genes, and yet this is a genetic condition. Because genetic traits are not that simple. There is homosexuality among other animals, and they do not engage in as many choices as we do. And what do you mean by "protected?" I don't think people are actually opposed to a scientifically-derived "cure" for homosexuality. It's just that purported "cures" for it are bullshit and harm people. As for autism, while some people might have mild forms that don't merit treatment, there are some for whom autism is extremely debilitating. I'm not aware of any cases of homosexuality that can be called debilitating. So while society might lose something if the high functioning autistic people are "cured," because they often have a unique perspective that may be valuable, nobody is harmed by curing the people who are incapable of taking care of themselves and are non-verbal. In the event they discover an actual "cure" for homosexuality, and people want to take it, then fine. But in that event, they would also "cure" heterosexuality and people could then actually choose to be gay. Hopefully by then the religious wrong will stop giving a shit. |
|
|
| (1208777) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 30 09:02:49 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 00:07:51 2014. IAWTP 100% |
|
|
| (1208780) | |
Re: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now? |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Jul 30 09:24:00 2014, in response to Re: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jul 29 17:19:51 2014. You, RIPTA42, are a liberal.Yes sir, a card carrying, bleeding heart liberal. |
|
|
| (1208814) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 10:48:18 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 00:07:51 2014. And you Rwers whine about "calling people names"..... |
|
|
| (1208859) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 13:04:46 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 10:48:18 2014. I'm a RWer? |
|
|
| (1208899) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 13:56:14 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 13:04:46 2014. From what you say here, yes. |
|
|
| (1208900) | |
Re: There is a liberal War on All Women |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 30 13:56:17 2014, in response to Re: There is no liberal War on Real Women, posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 29 23:13:45 2014. That's what liberals want. |
|
|
| (1208902) | |
Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 30 13:58:05 2014, in response to Re: The liberal War on Real Women (was: Michele Bachmann says what about Gays now?), posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 30 13:56:14 2014. LOL! Examples??? |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 4 |
||