Re: Second “whistleblower” (1663804)		Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Second “whistleblower”

Posted by AlM on Sat Oct 5 08:43:37 2019, in response to Re: Second “whistleblower”, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 5 08:30:25 2019. We don't need the whistleblower. The White House's own summary of the conversation is evidence.

Responses

• Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sat Oct 5 23:31:38 2019
  • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Spider-Pig - Sat Oct 5 23:40:44 2019
    • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sun Oct 6 00:46:00 2019
      • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Spider-Pig - Sun Oct 6 00:58:13 2019
        • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sun Oct 6 01:20:35 2019
          • Re: Second “whistleblower” - AlM - Sun Oct 6 06:04:18 2019
            • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sun Oct 6 14:10:45 2019
              • Re: Second “whistleblower” - AlM - Sun Oct 6 14:25:25 2019
                • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sun Oct 6 14:51:17 2019
        • Re: Second “whistleblower” - AlM - Sun Oct 6 05:59:06 2019
          • Re: Second “whistleblower” - Henry R32 #3730 - Sun Oct 6 14:13:53 2019

Post a New Response