|
|
| Re: Second “whistleblower” (1664181) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Second “whistleblower” |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 5 23:40:44 2019, in response to Re: Second “whistleblower”, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sat Oct 5 23:31:38 2019. There wasn't any explicit quid pro quo in the summary. I read it. If you imagine Trump as a cunning mafia-esque linguist, you can see a quid pro quo.That’s a weird phrase. Mafia dons aren’t well known for being intelligent types with clever wordplay. But Trump does act like a mafia don. That is, until you learn Ukraine didn't even know the aid was held up until a month after the call. Then they got the aid anyway, without any Biden dirt being provided. So, they didn't know the quid wasn't coming during the call, then they got the quid without providing the pro quo. Who cares? The House isn’t impeaching Zelensky. Many of Trump's policies are straight out of the democrat handbook Bullshit. Cite just one of these. but because the media has successfully brainwashed their base into "anything the Orange Man does is bad" they are forced to go far left for potential voters. Then they start trying to out-left each other on the debate stage and go off into crazyland.The media are who got Trump elected in the first place. Mike Pence would be a breath of fresh air after this nightmare. Democrats are trying to “outleft” each other because of the false media narrative that Twitter represents the Democratic Party. |
|
|
|