|
|
| Re: SWIMMING WHILE BLACK Pasadena California (1529185) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: SWIMMING WHILE BLACK Pasadena California |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Fri Jun 15 18:43:44 2018, in response to Re: SWIMMING WHILE BLACK Pasadena California, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jun 15 18:37:48 2018. It depends upon which individuals were affected. For example, if a workplace rule was passed that applied to everyone but only people over age 50 were unable to comply so they were fired, there's a presumption of disparate impact. Now the presumption can be rebutted by presenting facts as to why only people over 50 were affected; that may uphold the rule...or it may not, depending upon the facts and whether a judge buys into the explanation. |
|
|
|