|
|
| Re: MTA's Poor Priorities (314632) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (314984) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jun 27 23:38:52 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by RailBus63 on Mon Jun 27 12:26:55 2016. Not if the transit bus isn't making stops. |
|
|
| (314985) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jun 28 00:16:57 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jun 27 22:26:36 2016. Looks like you've been sick for a long time.http://www.subchat.com/buschat/read.asp?Id=179869 |
|
|
| (314992) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jun 28 08:23:22 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jun 28 00:16:57 2016. I see you still haven't learned how to code. |
|
|
| (314993) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jun 28 08:46:50 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jun 27 23:37:11 2016. And deed restrictions can never be changed? Anything can be changed if the politicians want to change it.Correct, the restriction can be lifted in Albany. It didn't happen when Giuliani wanted a hotel. Then when the City tried demolishing the buildings for a park, an injunction was issued against demolition. EDC wants to subdivide the property into house lots, which the community and local politicians don't want. No one has been looking for a park and ride. |
|
|
| (314994) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by RailBus63 on Tue Jun 28 09:04:15 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jun 27 23:38:52 2016. Not if the transit bus isn't making stops.I drove RTS buses for a year earlier in my career - buses accelerate slower than automobiles, and safe operation with passengers dictates more careful operation on on-ramps, when merging into traffic, etc. I am 100% certain that this trip would be several minutes longer on a transit bus than the times posted by Google. |
|
|
| (314997) | |
Cryin' Whinin' WHineberg |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jun 28 09:42:16 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jun 28 08:23:22 2016. Still gets the job done. Doesn't change the facts about YOUbuschat/read.asp?Id=179869 |
|
|
| (314999) | |
Re: Cryin' Whinin' WHineberg |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jun 28 09:49:41 2016, in response to Cryin' Whinin' WHineberg, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jun 28 09:42:16 2016. I made a coding error. While I figure it out, here's the URL.http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=1345335 |
|
|
| (315009) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 16:15:28 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jun 28 08:46:50 2016. Well maybe now they will. |
|
|
| (315010) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jun 28 16:23:15 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 16:15:28 2016. I wouldn't get my hopes up, but you never know. |
|
|
| (315012) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 18:14:33 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jun 27 09:06:04 2016. Yes, he is now playing the cello, not the bass. |
|
|
| (315013) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 18:15:20 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jun 26 23:59:44 2016. You can't say anything without an insult. |
|
|
| (315021) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 08:01:53 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 18:14:33 2016. Wrong. |
|
|
| (315022) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 08:02:48 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 18:15:20 2016. Wrong. As usual. |
|
|
| (315024) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 08:42:12 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 08:02:48 2016. Your standard response. Do You have that one hotkeyed? |
|
|
| (315025) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 08:44:42 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 08:01:53 2016. No you are WRONG because you said "bass" when you meant "base". |
|
|
| (315027) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 08:47:23 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 08:42:12 2016. Nope. It's the truth. You're saying that telling the truth is not the right thing to do? LOL! You have NO CREDIBILITY. |
|
|
| (315028) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 08:49:18 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 08:44:42 2016. No you are WRONG because you said "bass" when you meant "base".No, I was NOT wrong, as I corrected my mistake before you made your stupid post. YOU were WRONG for trying to chastise me for my mistake when I HAD ALREADY RECOGNIZED MY MISTAKE BY CORRECTING IT! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (315035) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 10:30:27 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 08:49:18 2016. To paraphrase Shakespeare A mistake is a mistake is a mistake. |
|
|
| (315044) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 13:55:43 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 10:30:27 2016. Of course. I make plenty of mistakes. Where have I ever said otherwise?But what does that have to do with your post being wrong? |
|
|
| (315053) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 16:38:53 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 08:42:12 2016. Bus:Cryin' Brian and his respectable crowd are out to get you. Don't bother responding to them. You'll have to trust the rest of us to evaluate your contributions. |
|
|
| (315054) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 16:57:08 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 13:55:43 2016. Are you confusing me with Bus? That's another mistake. |
|
|
| (315063) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 18:43:21 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 16:57:08 2016. Nope. I'm talking about you. |
|
|
| (315074) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 21:03:06 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 08:47:23 2016. So you also believe I was responsible for the Second Avenue subway not being completed because I wasn't doing my job of saving the MTA $4 million a day which he said was my job. |
|
|
| (315084) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 23:25:38 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 21:03:06 2016. Please make a response relevant to the post you are replying to. |
|
|
| (315086) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 23:36:07 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jun 29 13:55:43 2016. What post are you referring? |
|
|
| (315087) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jun 29 23:54:04 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jun 29 23:36:07 2016. Three one five oh three five. In other words, the post of yours that I directly replied to! This isn't rocket science... |
|
|
| (315092) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Thu Jun 30 06:13:20 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jun 29 23:54:04 2016. It's very simple to follow.You made a typo in a message writing "OFF BASS" instead of "OFF BASE." Bus pointed out your typo but then you wrote it wasn't a mistake because you corrected it before he pointed it out. I paraphrased Shakespeare. Even though you corrected the mistake, it's still a mistake. |
|
|
| (315096) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Thu Jun 30 07:18:50 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Thu Jun 30 06:13:20 2016. It's not a mistake that needed to be pointed out because it was already corrected and over and done with. It's when people don't correct their mistakes that there's a problem that needs to be pointed out. |
|
|
| (315104) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Thu Jun 30 11:24:28 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Thu Jun 30 07:18:50 2016. BUT in most cases, people can figure out the message even with a typo so there's no need to point it out. BUT YOU love to point them out. |
|
|
| (315120) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Thu Jun 30 18:34:37 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Thu Jun 30 11:24:28 2016. I do? Since when? Proff of a pattern of me pointing out typos more than the average person here? |
|
|
| (315170) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jul 1 11:20:57 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jun 29 23:25:38 2016. It certainly is relevent to your post. You say I have zero credibility. I am showing you that R30A has zero credibility by saying he wouldn't be surprised if I was responsible for the Second Avenue subway not being completed. That was based on his statement that my job among other responsibilities was to save $4 million a day and because I didn't do my job the MTA was $45 billion short to compete the Second Avenue Subway.So if you believe he has credibility and I do not, you would have to agree with him. So I am asking you if you in fact believe that I could have been responsible for the Second Avenue Subway not being completed because I wasn't saving $4 million a day as R30A claimed I should have been doing. So please answer yes or no without avoiding the question or changing the subject. |
|
|
| (315172) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Jul 1 11:28:18 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jul 1 11:20:57 2016. "It certainly is relevent to your post."It is not whatsoever. It is not relevant to ANY post that has been made by anybody. "You say I have zero credibility." And he is right! "I am showing you that R30A has zero credibility by saying he wouldn't be surprised if I was responsible for the Second Avenue subway not being completed." Whether or not something would surprise somebody has nothing to do with their credibility whatsoever. "That was based on his statement that my job among other responsibilities was to save $4 million a day and because I didn't do my job the MTA was $45 billion short to compete the Second Avenue Subway." I have never made this statement. Neither has anybody else. You are the only person who seems to not understand this. "So if you believe he has credibility and I do not, you would have to agree with him." A. I never made the claim that you had anything to do with SAS. B. To be of the opinion that someone has credibility, one does not have to agree with everything they say. For example: Spider-Pig and I disagree on a great deal with regards to automobile laws. I would never imply that I think he lacks credibility in any way, as such would be false. "So I am asking you if you in fact believe that I could have been responsible for the Second Avenue Subway not being completed because I wasn't saving $4 million a day as R30A claimed I should have been doing." I'll take this one for him. He does not, and I do not. I furthermore never made any claim of such. "So please answer yes or no without avoiding the question or changing the subject." The answer is NO. |
|
|
| (315226) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Fri Jul 1 14:06:05 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jul 1 11:20:57 2016. No. And no one ever even suggested anything of the sort. You just don't understand the usage of common phrases and/or figures of speech in the English language. So you misunderstood, and continue to misunderstand, what you are told here. |
|
|
| (315263) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Fri Jul 1 14:47:53 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by TerrApin Station on Fri Jul 1 14:06:05 2016. He doesn't have to agree with "what he is told here." Do you really think you're the Oracle of Delhi? |
|
|
| (315272) | |
Re: MTA's Poor Priorities |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Fri Jul 1 15:17:10 2016, in response to Re: MTA's Poor Priorities, posted by nostalgia on Fri Jul 1 14:47:53 2016. Where did I say he had to???? |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||