Home · Maps · About
Home > The Reef

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Duke Stripper Pal: Rape was 'Crock'(?)

Posted by Train Dude on Fri Jun 9 18:42:16 2006, in response to Re: Duke Stripper Pal: Rape was 'Crock'(?), posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Jun 9 16:35:31 2006.

1) All the exam proved is that she had sex before the exam.
2) She admitted that she had sex with her boyfriend during that evening.
3) The DNA found in her matched her boy friend but none of the accused.
4) Of the 3 she accused of the rape:
A) One was out of the house for virtually all of the time she was there - and has provided proff.
B) One of the people she accused she was only 90% sure of but said that she's be 100% if he had his moustache - which he never had.
5) She accused others of assault.
6) She has previously claimed to have been raped by 3 men before.
7) She's given conflicting testamony
8) She's been convicted of several crimes in the past.
9) Her family has acknowledged that she had a nervous breakdown less than a year ago.
10) Only one of the young men has had any previous run-ins with the law.

Now, salaam, why don't you post all of the evidence that makes you believe that these young men are guilty BESIDES THE FACT THAT THESE MEN ARE WHITE!

Responses

 Thread is locked Responses disabled

[ Return to the Message Index ]