|
|
| Re: PATH and Photography (966892) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (970759) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 06:36:23 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Easy on Mon Aug 23 22:57:08 2010. No, I mean that there's an established code of conduct, and photography is not mentioned in it, therefore the signs are bogus. |
|
|
| (970762) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by chuchubob on Tue Aug 24 07:28:58 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 23 22:18:09 2010. I got yelled at over the public address system for taking this photo at Cityplace Station in June, 2008.
|
|
|
| (970764) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 24 08:01:43 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by chuchubob on Tue Aug 24 07:28:58 2010. It was probably some SubChatter grabbing the microphone as there are girls in the photo.your pal, Fred |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (970777) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 08:31:38 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 24 08:01:43 2010. Haha! MNCR's Worst Conductor and Worst Employee and Huge Hypocrite strikes again!!! |
|
|
| (970793) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 09:24:13 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 08:31:38 2010. Haha! MNCR's Worst Conductor and Worst Employee and Huge Hypocrite strikes again!!!Last time i checked he dont work for that Rail system nor has he ever.. You sound Obsessed with him got a man crush or something? |
|
|
| (970799) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:34:40 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 09:24:13 2010. IAWTP it was an unwarranted personal attack IMHO |
|
|
| (970803) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 09:42:58 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:34:40 2010. You'd be wrong. I guess you're a huge hypocrite just like him then. |
|
|
| (970813) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 09:57:37 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:34:40 2010. was an unwarranted personal attackIt wasnt a personal attack,its just a man crush or an obsession. My opinion of coruse. |
|
|
| (970814) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:57:58 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 09:42:58 2010. Nope. It was an unwarranted personal attack. This was a conversation about the Dallas system and them using their PA system to scold 2 subchatters and many here know for a fact that TMP has never worked in Dallas and only for NYCT & MNR. Those who know him knows for a FACT he wouldn't use the PA like that so yes it is an unwarranted personal attack, and if someone said the same of you we'd be seeing you whining. |
|
|
| (970819) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 10:01:26 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 09:57:37 2010. That might be too, but either way IMHO it was unwarranted as it was nowhere close to having TMP involved |
|
|
| (970821) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:02:06 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 23 21:12:36 2010. I said 'supposedly' because I wasn't sure if I was right. Stop being a pretentious attention seeker, Brian Weinberg. |
|
|
| (970827) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Tue Aug 24 10:04:56 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Easy on Mon Aug 23 21:21:15 2010. Photographers are detained and interrogated in Texas even if they are not violating any laws.This is only the latest in the series of incidents in the Texan war against photography. |
|
|
| (970831) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:07:52 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Lord Vader on Mon Aug 23 13:52:24 2010. I wasn't aware they weren't subsidized. However, they are in financial straits.http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/staten_island/wanted_goethals_bridge_builder_OCeDkiD7o4Xwqv2hxfrQqL |
|
|
| (970835) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:11:27 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 06:36:23 2010. Just because it's not in their written code of conduct, doesn't mean they can't have a specific rule for a specific location. |
|
|
| (970836) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:12:18 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:57:58 2010. He is whining. |
|
|
| (970837) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 10:13:47 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:12:18 2010. Hes livid that all these cool Trips are on days hes cant attend... |
|
|
| (970838) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 10:14:34 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 10:01:26 2010. Nah let him whine, it makes for good comedy.... |
|
|
| (970842) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:22:42 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Aug 23 23:02:34 2010. That would seem to be in violation of Article IV Section 1, and Article IV Section 2. |
|
|
| (970843) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Aug 24 10:25:19 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:22:42 2010. I not entirely sure issuing driver's licenses falls under interstate commerce or anything along those lines. I don't know if anyone has tried changing these sorts of rules, but the law that requires all driver's licenses to be recognized throughout the US only applies to full licenses. |
|
|
| (970845) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Aug 24 10:29:35 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Nilet on Tue Aug 24 00:02:11 2010. You've probably posted about more experiences in dealing with the cops than anyone else on your own, these aren't fabricated by other people. Also, I've personally seen you block the RFW on fantrips in a way such that small kids can't stand there and can make other conclusions based on that repeated action (I'm not the only person to observe this). Stand by what you say, I hope it serves you well in court, but don't come whining here if it doesn't work out in your favor and pretend as if you weren't warned. |
|
|
| (970847) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:34:54 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Aug 24 10:25:19 2010. Hmm...I could understand not recognizing the various 'junior' license classes as permission to drive (especially given how every state has different criteria an age limits for their issuance), but it certainly wouldn't preclude someone from using such a document as identification, including a state-issued non-driver identification card. |
|
|
| (970854) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:53:20 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:57:58 2010. Nope. You're being a hypocrite. You ignore when Paul does the same thing, totally unwarranted, and then call me out when I respond to it, warranted, not necessarily in the same thread. Completely hypocritical.Also, you take things way too seriously if you think anyone thought MNCR's Worst Conductor and Worst Photographer and Biggest Hypocrite worked in Dallas. |
|
|
| (970855) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 10:53:28 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 10:14:34 2010. That is true. |
|
|
| (970857) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 10:56:02 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:53:20 2010. Obsessed!!Livid!! Bitter!!! |
|
|
| (970858) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:56:56 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:02:06 2010. In other words you were too lazy to just look it up. That's wrong. It would have taken only a minute to find. You replied to my post and did not add anything useful or even simply confirm what I stated. You only added doubt. Don't reply to my posts if you can't handle it. And stop being so wrong, Hank Eisenstein. |
|
|
| (970859) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 24 10:57:46 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 09:34:40 2010. I'm just waiting for the Chorus of Chastity™ to begin the rant.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (970860) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:00:29 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:11:27 2010. Of course not. But a rule not in their legally established code of conduct that violates other existing rules, laws, statutes, or accepted principles of the United State of America would not be valid.That's not to mention that a rule that IS in their legally established code of conduct that violates other existing rules, laws, statutes, or accepted principles of the United State of America might also not be valid, but that would probably take a court case to prove. |
|
|
| (970861) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:01:05 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 24 10:57:46 2010. Sometimes Fred its not even worth the bandwidth ya know? |
|
|
| (970862) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:01:21 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:53:20 2010. No he doesn't do it he does it only in defense of himself, and that is warranted and always provoked by you. So no I am not a hypocrite, sorry.I am not taking it seriously because I know no one will think MNR's best conductor - non-hypocrite c/r worked in Dallas was just saying that in showing how you personally unwarrantedly attacked him out of nowhere. If you feel he personally attacked you unwarrantedly, maybe you should say something in that thread. Then maybe your personal attack might be warranted probably not but a better chance than doing it in another thread nowhere related to him Keep going though I can use a laugh |
|
|
| (970863) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:01:31 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 10:56:02 2010. Yup |
|
|
| (970864) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:02:15 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 24 10:57:46 2010. LOL, it's already begun! Look at Railman and Arnine flop! Now all we need is MNCR's Worst Conductor and Worst Photographer and Biggest Hypocrite to join in! |
|
|
| (970865) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:03:11 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:01:21 2010. No he doesn't do it he does it only in defense of himself, Wanna bet, LOL? Come on. Put your money where your mouth is. |
|
|
| (970866) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:03:52 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:01:21 2010. If you talk enough and throw facts in his face about his hypocrisy after a while he will just ignore you arnine.Keep it up! |
|
|
| (970867) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:05:09 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:02:15 2010. Laughing at yourself again?When is Tony Clifton Coming back? |
|
|
| (970868) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Aug 24 11:08:54 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:05:09 2010. Tony Clifton? from Riverdale? Is he coming back? |
|
|
| (970869) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:10:59 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Aug 24 11:08:54 2010. Tony Clifton? from Riverdale? Is he coming back?When the meltdown happens he will return... Maybe Mr Volt will show up as well... Or Sir Ronald Of McDonald... |
|
|
| (970870) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Aug 24 11:11:29 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 10:34:54 2010. I'm pretty sure it is still considered valid ID (I used my driver's license as ID in Brazil fairly often when I wasn't carrying my passport on my person and had no problems, usually to verify I was the rightful user of my credit card) but doesn't necessarily entitle you to drive within that state's borders. Pennsylvania doesn't recognize out of state learner's permits or provisional licenses, so if someone was pulled over and driving on one of those, that driver would effectively be driving without a license and subject to the fines and other penalties that result from that offense, regardless of whether they knew the law or not. |
|
|
| (970871) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:12:18 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:02:15 2010. Now you are a hypocrite. You have gall calling someone else a worst photographer. Have you seen how awful your photos are? Man, that is the pot calling the kettle black. You don't even come close to being how great a photographer he is. Man keep up the comedy I love it |
|
|
| (970872) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:12:48 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:10:59 2010. Exactly. He is really giving us comedy. |
|
|
| (970873) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Aug 24 11:13:23 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:10:59 2010. I knew about Sir Ronald McD but had no clue about Mr Volt. Thanks for the tip. Isn't having more than one handle a violation of the rules here? I wonder why the moderator has not taken any action? |
|
|
| (970874) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:13:47 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:12:48 2010. Word. |
|
|
| (970875) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:16:20 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 11:03:11 2010. I'd win that if I was a betting man. But, what I said here is still true that you unwarrantedly personally attacked TMP. |
|
|
| (970877) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:17:58 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 11:03:52 2010. Yeah sadly he gets confused with facts. |
|
|
| (970883) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Tue Aug 24 11:31:59 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:17:58 2010. Not just confused with facts, but apparently confused by reality. Poor delusional, confused little boy. Tsk, tsk. |
|
|
| (970885) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Aug 24 11:38:48 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by BigBusDriver on Tue Aug 24 11:31:59 2010. True. |
|
|
| (970907) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 12:30:27 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:56:56 2010. I can handle it just fine. Unlike you, I have a number of better things to do then to check up on Amtrak's current photo policy. My reply simply put what my understanding of the rules were. The entire point of this board is to share information and discuss a subject that all participants enjoy. Most posts add to that discussion; some are somewhat off-topic yet related, and a few are off-topic but of interest to some others here.You could have replied politely with a confirmation, or a contradiction; instead, you just chose to remain a self-important oaf who is afraid to sign his real name to anything. With the exception of when you post photos, your posts are often inflammatory, frequently self-aggrandizing, constantly antagonistic, and rarely useful. And when someone discovers or proves that you've been incorrect, you refuse to admit to your error. You refuse to even acknowledge the possibility you could be wrong. It's a wonder anyone ever takes you seriously; on a personal level, I think you should be ashamed of yourself, as you do not show people that you live your life by the principles of the religion you choose to observe, no matter how staunchly you may defend it. And stop being a such a pretentious attention seeker, Terrapin Station. |
|
|
| (970911) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 12:33:00 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Aug 24 11:13:23 2010. Because they have a special relationship. |
|
|
| (970918) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 12:38:04 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 12:30:27 2010. You actaully think that young man is going to even listen to that well informed, thought-out and factual post Hank??Seriously do you??? |
|
|
| (970926) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Aug 24 12:52:49 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Railman718 on Tue Aug 24 09:24:13 2010. Just being a troll and looking to bait as always. That young man will never learn....SMH |
|
|
| (970962) | |
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Randyo on Tue Aug 24 14:22:20 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by BMTLines on Tue Aug 24 10:04:56 2010. As I said in several other threads on this topic, it's time for a sting operation where the photog is a federal officer with the power to immediately arrest any rent - a cops or genuine police officers who exceed their authority. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
