|
|
| Re: PATH and Photography (970907) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: PATH and Photography |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Aug 24 12:30:27 2010, in response to Re: PATH and Photography, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Aug 24 10:56:56 2010. I can handle it just fine. Unlike you, I have a number of better things to do then to check up on Amtrak's current photo policy. My reply simply put what my understanding of the rules were. The entire point of this board is to share information and discuss a subject that all participants enjoy. Most posts add to that discussion; some are somewhat off-topic yet related, and a few are off-topic but of interest to some others here.You could have replied politely with a confirmation, or a contradiction; instead, you just chose to remain a self-important oaf who is afraid to sign his real name to anything. With the exception of when you post photos, your posts are often inflammatory, frequently self-aggrandizing, constantly antagonistic, and rarely useful. And when someone discovers or proves that you've been incorrect, you refuse to admit to your error. You refuse to even acknowledge the possibility you could be wrong. It's a wonder anyone ever takes you seriously; on a personal level, I think you should be ashamed of yourself, as you do not show people that you live your life by the principles of the religion you choose to observe, no matter how staunchly you may defend it. And stop being a such a pretentious attention seeker, Terrapin Station. |
|
|
|