|
|
| Re: (894538) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 10 |
||
|
| (894671) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:42:56 2010, in response to Re: WILL OLOG-HAIIII STOP REMOVING THE TOPIC LABEL AND BE NORMAL?, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 09:52:55 2010. Normal? You're the one that ain't normal, kiddo. Brainsplatter all over the keyboard. |
|
|
| (894672) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:43:02 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:38:24 2010. That one's even better. Stupendous, even!Meh... |
|
|
| (894673) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:44:57 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:43:02 2010. You're on a roll. (As far as this thread goes, that is.) |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (894674) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:51:25 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:44:57 2010. You're on a roll. (As far as this thread goes, that is.)Just just giving my comment on what i think about the question of the ridership increase... |
|
|
| (894675) | |
Meh... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:52:23 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:35:08 2010. See title... |
|
|
| (894677) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 11:06:12 2010, in response to Meh..., posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:52:23 2010. Works for me. It's as good as the thread's going to get. |
|
|
| (894683) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 11:22:00 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 02:14:53 2010. Not really. I'm just stating facts that I've proved time and time again. If you or anybody can't take my prior post as fact then you need to get your eyes examined. |
|
|
| (894686) | |||
Re: |
|||
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Feb 3 11:23:59 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 11:06:12 2010.
|
|||
|
| (894699) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 12:04:44 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 11:22:00 2010. I'm just stating facts that I've proved time and time againNo, it's your opinion. Don't let your head explode because you've been parodied Zelda-style . . . |
|
|
| (894700) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 12:04:49 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 11:22:00 2010. I'm just stating facts that I've prove(n) time and time againNo, it's your opinion. Don't let your head explode because you've been parodied Zelda-style . . . |
|
|
| (894702) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 12:06:52 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Feb 3 11:23:59 2010. Are you saying that's a picture of Olog-hai on a "good day?" he looks like a real pussy cat to me...lol |
|
|
| (894703) | |
RE and more REs... |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 12:09:02 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:42:56 2010. Cause you fear that truth at times? and when you fear it....you just DELETE the TITLE OF THE THREAD...not good....my son.....there are better things to delete in life....like a few pounds off your ego..... |
|
|
| (894705) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Feb 3 12:13:39 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 10:35:08 2010. It's quite annoying when you do that. |
|
|
| (894719) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Feb 3 12:36:42 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 02:02:14 2010. You keep on saying "Observe the ridership levels"Well. Those ridership levels state fairly clearly that second avenue is the LEAST USED STATION IN MANHATTAN on the V line. Even if 2nd Ave "needs" the V train, Delancey-Essex needs it more. |
|
|
| (894720) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Feb 3 12:42:21 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Feb 3 12:13:39 2010. At least change the wording in the subject line.How many unrelated entries are there on this website that start with Re"? |
|
|
| (894721) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Neil Feldman on Wed Feb 3 12:52:03 2010, in response to Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Chipper10 on Tue Feb 2 20:07:34 2010. Grow Up Chipper! I keep telling you, when it happens, it happens! |
|
|
| (894723) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 12:59:13 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by R30A on Wed Feb 3 12:36:42 2010. I'm still not convinced. |
|
|
| (894725) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 13:07:01 2010, in response to Re:, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Feb 3 12:42:21 2010. Olag is bored with life...had nothing better to do than to erase titles and make it more of a challenge than to debate real issues... |
|
|
| (894727) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 13:08:41 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 12:59:13 2010. Go to Delancey/Essex and observe how many people transfer from a Coney F to northbound J/M/Z and southbound J/M/Z to northbound F. |
|
|
| (894729) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 13:14:52 2010, in response to Re:, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 13:07:01 2010. Why don't you stop whining about it. What he does is just a little more extreme that what you and most everybdy here does when we alter the subject line. You have two simpler choices. Either look back 1 level of the thread and put the subject back OR you can just ignore any posting that he's made where he's altered the subject line. Save us all the histrionics |
|
|
| (894731) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 13:20:39 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 13:08:41 2010. I've observed that plenty of times over a 7-year span. The crowds doesn't justify to have the V line there. Here is something worth noting (yes its more ridership statistics):Ridership at Essex-Delancey in 2001 (the last full year before the rehab began) was at 4,513,142. Compared to 2008 which was at 6,203,633. That's a ridership increase of 1,690,491. Still not enough to justify to have the V line stop there. |
|
|
| (894740) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 13:55:01 2010, in response to RE and more REs..., posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 12:09:02 2010. What truth? I yank the thread title when it's untrue or just plain stupid. I learned thread title alteration from others when Subtalk was still open; but I discovered that pulling the thread title altogether gets the point across faster (and you made me do it, here, so that's your fault now). |
|
|
| (894742) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 13:57:17 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 13:14:52 2010. He's the one that wanted me to remove the subject line. All I did was change it, before he blabbed about that, and changing the subject line is something that lots of other Subtalkers/Subchatters do anyhow. (I'm amused that a blank thread title has become my signature move, though.) |
|
|
| (894744) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 14:00:27 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Railman718 on Wed Feb 3 10:51:25 2010. I can totally dig it. Poor old 33rd Street is actually taking it seriously . . . |
|
|
| (894748) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:14:07 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 13:20:39 2010. You are missing my point.How many people transfer between the F and J/M/Z????? |
|
|
| (894749) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:17:42 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:14:07 2010. How many people transfer between the F and J/M/Z?????An exact number would be impossible to throw out and post here. Supposedly if the transfer at Essex-Delancey was never built? |
|
|
| (894750) | |
TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:21:05 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:17:42 2010. Make the F bypass 2nd Ave, which would render the V useless in finding a terminal - - except Metropolitan Ave. :-P |
|
|
| (894751) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:24:56 2010, in response to TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:21:05 2010. Not going to happen by a long shot. Seems like you really want me to get pissed off. BTW, 2nd Avenue isn't really in the Lower East Side. |
|
|
| (894753) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:29:56 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:24:56 2010. Nah, just having some fun. Lighten up brother. |
|
|
| (894755) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Wed Feb 3 14:34:23 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Feb 3 11:23:59 2010. Oh, it's your cousin, the broadway tiger. |
|
|
| (894756) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:39:21 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:29:56 2010. Just checking! |
|
|
| (894757) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:40:10 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:39:21 2010. Next time, look at the chat symbol after what I wrote. |
|
|
| (894759) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 14:46:22 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 13:14:52 2010. "Why don't you stop whining about it."Whose WHINIG>?..lol..I am stating a FACT...as anyone...who knows him |
|
|
| (894762) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 14:52:42 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:14:07 2010. How many people transfer between the F and J/M/Z?????18,394. |
|
|
| (894763) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 14:55:13 2010, in response to TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Feb 3 14:21:05 2010. Yes, the land above it would be needed for when we TEAR DOWN THE EAST RIVER and move JFK there to get rid of AIRTRAIN. |
|
|
| (894772) | |
Re: CLICK HERE TO READ POST |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:21:11 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 13:57:17 2010. But they're hard to click on because it's small. |
|
|
| (894775) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:26:19 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 14:55:13 2010. You'll still have to pay the $5 pedestrian toll though. |
|
|
| (894777) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:28:08 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 14:17:42 2010. How is it impossible? |
|
|
| (894794) | |
|
|
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:44:46 2010, in response to Re: CLICK HERE TO READ POST, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:21:11 2010. You can get smaller than "Re:". |
|
|
| (894795) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 15:44:52 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:28:08 2010. Simple. You can't tell if they just came off the F line as well as the J/M/Z. Also, there is many stairwells that would make it impossible to count every passenger simultaneously. |
|
|
| (894799) | |
8203; |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:47:40 2010, in response to , posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:44:46 2010. I wonder if Zero Width Space works too... |
|
|
| (894800) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:48:25 2010, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN LOWER EAST SIDE-2ND AVE TERMINAL, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:26:19 2010. DIAF! ;-) |
|
|
| (894804) | |
|
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Feb 3 15:50:54 2010, in response to , posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:44:46 2010. |
|
|
| (894805) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 15:51:13 2010, in response to Re:, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Feb 3 14:46:22 2010. Why don't you revert to form and blame Bush? |
|
|
| (894807) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 15:52:01 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 3 15:51:13 2010. Blame Bush for streetcarman and Chipper? I wouldn't even blame Obama for them . . . |
|
|
| (894811) | |
Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 3 15:54:51 2010, in response to Re: Will ridership increase with the M/V train merger., posted by 33rd Street on Wed Feb 3 15:44:52 2010. They have people who figure these things out. |
|
|
| (894812) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 15:54:54 2010, in response to , posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:44:46 2010. Yeah, and there's an unreadable one on the board now . . . |
|
|
| (894813) | |
Re: ZMan, that is great news, replacing the M train with the V train. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Feb 3 15:55:29 2010, in response to 8203;, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:47:40 2010. Dunno if it's clickable. |
|
|
| (894814) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:56:02 2010, in response to , posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Feb 3 15:50:54 2010. So which character did you use? |
|
|
| (894816) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Feb 3 15:57:25 2010, in response to Re: , posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Wed Feb 3 15:56:02 2010. Non-breaking space. Alt+0173 gets you that. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 10 |
||
