|
|
| Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer (865383) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
|
| (866207) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 21:54:11 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Pelham Bay Dave on Tue Dec 1 21:50:48 2009. I just shake my head @ them..My A Div peeps tell me they are really spoiled... Over here in the B Div i had to tell one of them just to stop it @ Parsons this past weekend... So what you got tunred and had to do four trips instead of three on the Echo suck it up and deal with it... |
|
|
| (866208) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 1 21:56:08 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 21:54:11 2009. I would need therapy if I had to do 4 on the E. NTSB should ban those jobs. |
|
|
| (866209) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 21:59:40 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Dec 1 21:56:08 2009. Heh @ least you have an option NOT to pick it you know...;o) |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (866214) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Pelham Bay Dave on Tue Dec 1 22:04:14 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 21:54:11 2009. When I was at Pelham a few where talking about how they hate the 6 Line and the crew office must hate them. So I told them whenever they can pick go to B Div and Visit Far Rockaway |
|
|
| (866218) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 22:11:07 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Pelham Bay Dave on Tue Dec 1 22:04:14 2009. So I told them whenever they can pick go to B Div and Visit Far RockawayA Div rookies have no idea how easy they got it, lol... There was a person on Board @ Bedford Park they got sent to Parson J to pick up a job the person resumed.. They then sent the person to Stillwell Fox for a 1900 hr G.O job... Oh and BTW it was that persons Friday... Dont ya just love it? ;o) |
|
|
| (866233) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Pelham Bay Dave on Tue Dec 1 22:33:21 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 22:11:07 2009. They did that to me too. I was at 207 Street 13:00 Board. They tell me to report to Euclid pick up C Job at 15:04. I get there the person booked of earlier but shows up to resume. I put back on the Board. Then then send me to pick up a Delta job at Bedford Pk. I get there the T/D giving it to me on why it took 1 1/2 to get from 207.I had to currect them saying I'm coming from Euclid now not 207. |
|
|
| (866342) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:02:12 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Mon Nov 30 21:46:28 2009. Train Dude is RTO..So you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in the RTO dept? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it? |
|
|
| (866343) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:03:05 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Nov 30 21:48:05 2009. CED is part of RTO now?So you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in CED? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it? |
|
|
| (866345) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:04:05 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Mon Nov 30 22:01:49 2009. LOL sorry i meant Car Equipment...So you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in the Car Equipment division? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it? Where are all the hypocrites now? |
|
|
| (866346) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:04:37 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Dec 1 00:37:40 2009. I know Train Dude is CEDSo you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in the Car Equipment division? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it? Where are all the hypocrites now? |
|
|
| (866351) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:08:44 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 14:43:27 2009. lol, pwn3d |
|
|
| (866357) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Deaks on Wed Dec 2 07:34:29 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:04:37 2009. Just shut up, you moron. |
|
|
| (866367) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:24:28 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:02:12 2009. So you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in the RTO dept? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it?Whatever beef you and him have is you and him,not to mention i got the department wrong. |
|
|
| (866368) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:26:02 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 07:04:05 2009. So you're posting outright that he works for NYCT in the Car Equipment division? I thought that was supposed to be private information that no one posts here because he never talks about it? Where are all the hypocrites now?Oh stop whining... |
|
|
| (866369) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 08:26:57 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:24:28 2009. haha, try again, this time answering the question asked. |
|
|
| (866371) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:28:08 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Dec 2 08:26:57 2009. No im not as i said whatever beef you and that man has is none of my buisness since i wasnt aware of such a thing being said..Sorry. Stop whining please. |
|
|
| (866373) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Dec 2 08:28:53 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:28:08 2009. Robert, not even worth it. Chill out on Face Book. |
|
|
| (866374) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:30:48 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Dec 2 08:28:53 2009. How immature thats all im going to say and i will leave it at that. |
|
|
| (866378) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Dec 2 08:35:47 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Wed Dec 2 08:30:48 2009. It's nothing new. |
|
|
| (866411) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Dec 2 10:41:14 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Dec 2 08:35:47 2009. Not from him. Selectively ignoring his posts is the best thing to do. His only real value is in photographic advice threads. |
|
|
| (866412) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Dec 2 10:42:37 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Dec 1 14:06:49 2009. I already said my mea culpas on this subject. |
|
|
| (866413) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Wed Dec 2 10:44:09 2009, in response to Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Wallyhorse on Tue Dec 1 17:09:46 2009. 
|
|
|
| (866419) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 2 11:06:32 2009, in response to Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Dec 1 19:39:00 2009. FALSE |
|
|
| (866420) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 2 11:08:00 2009, in response to Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Wallyhorse on Tue Dec 1 17:09:46 2009. That to me would have given those who are too lazy to walkThat's what taxis and car service are for. or in late night afraid to walk outside w00t for them! People who are afraid to walk down State St at any time of day or night probably lack the "courage" to ride the subway in the first place. |
|
|
| (866440) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by 7th Avenue Express on Wed Dec 2 11:54:34 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 22:11:07 2009. They tend to do that to you on your Friday, but I don't mind it so much since I got the next 2 days off. |
|
|
| (866470) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Dec 2 12:45:03 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Bill From Maspeth on Mon Nov 30 21:15:18 2009. And if the last pick avaliable is an 0001 report time at Zoo Lots, well. . . LOL. |
|
|
| (866604) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Wed Dec 2 21:02:07 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Neil Feldman on Mon Nov 30 10:07:50 2009. It is, because everyone jams onto the first train that comes (as if there will never be another one). So if the 2 is the first train to come in a while, not only do those of us who need that 2 to get to the central Bronx get on, but so do the West Siders who could take a less crowded train home.Not sure you'll see R142s on the extended 1. There will probably be R62s on the 1. |
|
|
| (866664) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Dec 2 23:24:43 2009, in response to Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Wallyhorse on Tue Dec 1 17:09:46 2009. "too lazy to walk (or in late night afraid to walk outside"So they should add more lamp posts along the street then. I don't see the need for the shuttle or the 5/6 to stop at the loop. |
|
|
| (866869) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Dec 3 17:32:50 2009, in response to Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Dec 2 23:24:43 2009. I still think it would be a good idea to re-open the loop station for east side service while the 1 is forced to New Lots so for those who don't wish to walk coming off/going to the ferry, they would have that option. It also would show if having the loop open as a terminal for the 5/6 (and a revived BG-SF shuttle when the tracks between BB and BG are too crowded and the 5 is running to Brooklyn) is something that should become permanent.If nothing else, doing so, and especially rebuilding entrances to the short platform at BG would at least provide for alternate service if that became necessary. |
|
|
| (866875) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Thu Dec 3 18:07:22 2009, in response to Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Dec 3 17:32:50 2009. There is no point to doing this. I'm sorry. They got rid of the inner loop plat years ago and reccently the whole station, and there were reasons for that. I am starting to agree with the poster who posted the dead horse, because you are beating it beyond death. |
|
|
| (867683) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sat Dec 5 17:06:26 2009, in response to Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by arnine on Thu Dec 3 18:07:22 2009. Maybe I'm "beating" it because I think it's a very valid argument.Even before the new SF station opened, as I remember reading, SF Ferry riders wanted the old SF loop station kept open with a new connection to the Lexington Avenue Line. Doing it as I would (BG-SF Shuttle on weekdays when the 5 is running to Brooklyn, 6 during overnights and 5 all other times) would accomplish that and allow those on the east side to be able to get to SF without having to walk from BG, which is especially useful in bad weather like we have today. |
|
|
| (867702) | |
Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Sat Dec 5 17:18:09 2009, in response to Re: Re-opening old SF Terminal, posted by Wallyhorse on Sat Dec 5 17:06:26 2009. Well, then I suggest you tell the idea to NYCT/MTA instead of beating the horse beyond death here. Just my opinion. |
|
|
| (867811) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sat Dec 5 20:07:02 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by G1Ravage on Mon Nov 30 15:16:33 2009. I think they are going to do that swap, Since the summer time I had been seeing Green circles on the R62A's from 240th yard next to the red stcker, And I know green is 239th st. |
|
|
| (867814) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sat Dec 5 20:13:34 2009, in response to 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by 7th Avenue Express on Mon Nov 30 07:52:47 2009. Hey, at least you get to go outside on each end!! I think the R is far worse.....ALL stops UNDERGROUND Queens, Manhattan and Brooklyn!! I will take the #1 extended to New Lots ANY DAY over 2 on the R from either end, 95th or Continental!! I would even take the "Deuce" (#2) over the R any day of the week, and 10 times on Sunday!! |
|
|
| (867821) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by lrg5784 on Sat Dec 5 20:19:17 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Dec 5 20:07:02 2009. I thought green was for East 180th/Unionport. |
|
|
| (867823) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Dec 5 20:20:54 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Dec 5 20:07:02 2009. So if they are going to do such a swap, why not...?:- leave the 3 as is, but local in Manhattan - have the 2 end at 14th - have the 1 to Flatbush |
|
|
| (867886) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Sat Dec 5 22:24:41 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Dec 5 20:20:54 2009. More disruptive. Ending 3 at 14 Street inconveniences less people than ending 2 at 14 Street. |
|
|
| (867917) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Dec 5 23:49:40 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Dec 5 20:07:02 2009. haahahahahaha |
|
|
| (867940) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Dec 6 01:17:45 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by BrooklynBus on Sat Dec 5 22:24:41 2009. Absolutely:If they have to send the 1 to a terminal other than South Ferry, New Lots makes the most sense since that was the pattern after 9/11. The alternative would be to have the 1, 2 and 3 all scrape the wall to 72nd or Times Square, with the 1 then running express to 14th and terminating there OR having trains cross the tracks at 96th like they used to, with the 2/3 running local from 96th-Chambers and the 1 express from 96th-14th. |
|
|
| (867959) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Sun Dec 6 02:27:34 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Dec 6 01:17:45 2009. "...with the 2/3 running local from 96th-Chambers and the 1 express from 96th-14th."That was the original post-9/11 plan. But after all the delays it caused with 2/3 trains switching from the express to the local tracks and vice versa for 1 trains, that plan got scrapped in favor of 1/2 local service to Brooklyn and 3 express service to 14th Street. And rightfully so. |
|
|
| (867961) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sun Dec 6 02:43:11 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Railman718 on Tue Dec 1 20:58:14 2009. Yes.And it's looking like I might. We'll know in a few days. Keep that bug in your ear. |
|
|
| (867968) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 6 03:44:54 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Dec 6 02:43:11 2009. Sounds like A division bailed to B division and you guys are on the run. :) |
|
|
| (867970) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sun Dec 6 04:12:43 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 6 03:44:54 2009. Staying one step ahead.... |
|
|
| (867971) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 6 04:18:57 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Dec 6 04:12:43 2009. Heh. I may be out of there since 1971, but I can sure put two and two together when it comes to ... the list. I ended up in the south because STL's kids pretty much caused everyone in B to move out east ... there's still a few here whose dads chose the east because of STL. Amusingly, it's STILL like that.Big picks with changes send people where they don't belong. Just because it appears to me that the morons took wing from A division doesn't mean they didn't leave a mess behind for someone else to clean up. Wouldn't be the FIRST time. :) |
|
|
| (867995) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Dec 6 08:17:28 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Sun Dec 6 02:27:34 2009. I thought he was talking about 1&3 locals and 2 express to 14 Street. I also think that would be more disruptive. |
|
|
| (868077) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by 7th Avenue Express on Sun Dec 6 10:24:28 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Dec 6 01:17:45 2009. That would also cause delays north of 96th |
|
|
| (868238) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Dec 6 17:46:30 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by 7th Avenue Express on Sun Dec 6 10:24:28 2009. Which is exactly why they made the right choice in a bad situation. |
|
|
| (868252) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Dec 6 18:11:39 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by BrooklynBus on Sat Dec 5 22:24:41 2009. But if they have to send some 1s to Flatbush, doesn't that show New Lots doesn't need all 1s ending there? That's why I think trimming the 2 back and leaving the 3 alone would be best for the 1. Plus the 2 is pretty long in the Bronx as is.I don't see why the 3 [from 148th to 14th as an express] makes sense over an already long 2 line [from 241st to Flatbush] and to run all local. I really hope they don't cut the 5 back to BG. Service to/from 7th Av is spotty, the 5 has been very helpful taking off pressure from the 2. |
|
|
| (868264) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Dec 6 18:44:24 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Dec 5 20:20:54 2009. have the 1 to FlatbushI like the sound of that! The R68/As holding down the (B)/(Q) lines with the (1) line's 62As holding down the Nostrand Ave branch. Nice double whammy! |
|
|
| (868266) | |
Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Dec 6 18:46:36 2009, in response to Re: 1 train to New Lots next summer, posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Dec 6 18:44:24 2009. I don't think the 1 would be all R62A though, but I would hope a majority is R142 to swap with the 5 at Flatbush. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
