|
|
| PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) (416139) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (416139) | |
PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007 ENJOY!  Pullman Standard R-46 Subway Car #5594 (NYCS)
Regards, Trevor Logan Jr TNSI |
|
|
| (416146) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Apr 15 19:25:13 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. That second to last photo looks pretty suspicious... |
|
|
| (416161) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by R166463 on Sun Apr 15 19:39:11 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Whoa! That R16 could use a paintjob!I like the shot of the R160A signed up as the Z. Cool pics BTW. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (416165) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by P-rad M on Sun Apr 15 19:43:06 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Really great pics! Looks like the MTA is ready for the Q to go to 96th Street already, and SAS is still barely starting. |
|
|
| (416167) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Lord Vader on Sun Apr 15 19:44:44 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Very nice pictures. That R160 Q train should say "Yorkville-96 St".Lord Vader |
|
|
| (416170) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sun Apr 15 19:49:22 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Trevor,I truly enjoy seeing your photography, although putting 25 large JPEG files in a single post is quite frustrating. I'm on a fairly fast connection and it still must have taken 5 minutes to load the page. If you could either break up future posts or provide some type of warning beyond those with 56K modems, I (and quite possibly others) would greatly appreciate it. Also, the curious would like to know what TNSI is, but I think it may be safe to assume we shouldn't hold our breaths waiting for an answer... |
|
|
| (416171) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Sun Apr 15 19:53:36 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sun Apr 15 19:49:22 2007. My page loaded in about a minute. Maybe your connection was acting a little slower than normal? |
|
|
| (416172) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Transit Guy on Sun Apr 15 19:53:46 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Nice Photos and thanks for sharing. |
|
|
| (416180) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sun Apr 15 20:12:25 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by Zman179 on Sun Apr 15 19:53:36 2007. Mine loaded within 20 seconds. |
|
|
| (416199) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Sun Apr 15 20:37:26 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sun Apr 15 19:49:22 2007. I didnt have to wait at all-- It works fine for me... |
|
|
| (416216) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by R Pansepcc on Sun Apr 15 20:47:59 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Always great stuff Thanks |
|
|
| (416298) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by Q35 Limited on Sun Apr 15 22:52:48 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by J trainloco on Sun Apr 15 20:12:25 2007. same here. |
|
|
| (416301) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 15 22:54:37 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Any word on the group pic at Broadway Junction last Wednesday? |
|
|
| (416302) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Q35 Limited on Sun Apr 15 22:56:05 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Nice pictures especially the display inside the R160 showing the possible future Q service up 2nd Avenue.Also what happened to that redbird 9564? Is the paint peeling off? Also I kinda remember the doors of some redbirds on the 6 line having orange doors on the inside. It always struck me as odd. |
|
|
| (416309) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 23:09:25 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 15 22:54:37 2007. Yeah, I'll be sending that out in personal e-mails to those who are in the photo.Trevor |
|
|
| (416311) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 15 23:10:28 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 23:09:25 2007. Thank you! Much appreciated! |
|
|
| (416313) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Sun Apr 15 23:11:30 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Really nice shots; what camera are you using now?And that R36WF is corroding horribly. |
|
|
| (416315) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Neil Feldman on Sun Apr 15 23:13:53 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Trevor, now only if I saw you there to which I was there! |
|
|
| (416338) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by 3440 on Sun Apr 15 23:50:09 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by J trainloco on Sun Apr 15 20:12:25 2007. my loaded up in 5 seconds.BJC: |
|
|
| (416353) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection) |
|
|
Posted by Sand Box John on Mon Apr 16 00:32:24 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not Friendly for any connection), posted by 3440 on Sun Apr 15 23:50:09 2007. It would appear there are some bandwidth bottlenecks somewhere on the Internet. When I first clicked on the page around 2200 the images loaded rather slowly using my Verizon DSL connection down here in the sand box. As I make this post they are sill loading slowly.Very nice pictures regardless. John in the sand box of Maryland's eastern shore. |
|
|
| (416400) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Stef on Mon Apr 16 02:21:56 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Thank You for the excellent photos!Did anyone notice? It appears that at least one of the old R22 money cars has a new lease on life. That car looks good with fresh paint. -Stef |
|
|
| (416401) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Q35 Limited on Mon Apr 16 02:41:47 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Btw the R-77 shot is a red-x on my computer. |
|
|
| (416402) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 03:07:31 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. You have officially won the Internet with the shot of the R-160 signed as a (Q) to 96 Street on the Second Avenue Line. That is supremely awesome.An audio recording would've likely earned you a gold medal of some sort. |
|
|
| (416403) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 03:11:04 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 03:07:31 2007. The FIND transfers for Lexington Avenue - 63 Street list:4.6.F.N.R. The pic was taken on a weekend, so the (W) isn't there...but where's the (5)? |
|
|
| (416404) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 04:00:16 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 23:09:25 2007. Any reason why? |
|
|
| (416405) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Mon Apr 16 04:09:12 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 15 23:10:28 2007. e-mail sent to Trev. |
|
|
| (416753) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Tue Apr 17 02:51:56 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 03:11:04 2007. I was just thinking about how the AAS is programmed, and realized...how could they possibly have a program for the (Q) to 96 Street before the line is built? That'd make it quite difficult to program in the distance between stations, and the proper locations for the announcements to play. Unless it's programmed in by plans and schematics, and then tested to see if it was done right. |
|
|
| (416784) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Tue Apr 17 08:14:54 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by R166463 on Sun Apr 15 19:39:11 2007. 9564 needs some body work.What's with the slits next to the doors on 1000? IIRC 1300 had the same treatment while it was being refurbished. Nice to see 103 and 401, too. |
|
|
| (416818) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Tue Apr 17 11:39:55 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Excellent pics Trevor. 2 corrections:1. R36 WF is 9564 and not 9542. 9542 is an R36 ML-its whereabouts are unknown. 2. R77 901 does have a red X on it. Some of these cars look awesome while others are just sitting there collecting rot. 9564 I believe will be scrapped and cut up. It looks absolutely horrendous. Not sure why 9074 was linked to it? IMO, 9564/9565 should've been reefed and another pair should've been put in their place at the time of the farewell. It should've been either 9588 or 9595 leading and not 9564. Both were in far much better shape than 9564/9565 was in. What happened to R36 WF #9565? Where is it currently? Was it cut up for scrap? Will any of these other cars ever be operated again for future fantrips? I.E. R6 1000? R16 6305? R16 6339? My favorite pic overall was R160A #8325. |
|
|
| (416826) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by R42 4787 on Tue Apr 17 12:18:07 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by mr_brian on Sun Apr 15 23:11:30 2007. Even worse than if it was underwater. |
|
|
| (416883) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Élément Dramatique on Tue Apr 17 15:23:11 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by mr_brian on Sun Apr 15 23:11:30 2007. I'm using a Samsung Pro815 now.T. |
|
|
| (416885) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Apr 17 15:26:10 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Tue Apr 17 15:23:11 2007. What happened to the camera that everyone was using, the Kodak P850 (which I still have)?Your new camera and lens really rock! |
|
|
| (416886) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Élément Dramatique on Tue Apr 17 15:29:33 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Apr 17 15:26:10 2007. Well David, I personally like to stand out from the crowd when it comes to equipment and everyone having the same camera doesn't do it for me. So it was time to change up.Trevor |
|
|
| (416888) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Apr 17 15:33:54 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Tue Apr 17 15:29:33 2007. I don't blame you, a great photographer has to stand out with the best equipment possible.Next year, new PDA device (with much faster uploading) and new camera. I'm waiting for the 8 to 10 MP crop to be affordable. My camera is fine for this year (and I have learned a lot from using it), but it's gonna be time for a upgrade eventually. |
|
|
| (416889) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 17 15:35:07 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Tue Apr 17 15:23:11 2007. Hm. I Googled that, and it looks interesting. I can afford the $800 price tag (more or less), and it says it can take 640x480 videos. I guess f/2.2 is OK for underground photos, and it can also save photos in raw format. Have you ever tried taking videos?Also, nice photos. Did I say that earlier? Sorry, my brain isn't working. |
|
|
| (416892) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Apr 17 15:38:22 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by G1Ravage on Tue Apr 17 02:51:56 2007. It would probably be the latter. I'm quite amazed at that pic, too. I'm surprised they haven't programmed the thing up to 125th Street. |
|
|
| (416897) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 16:06:08 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Apr 17 15:33:54 2007. UPGRADE YAH.You know..I never had a real intrest in "taken pics"..but they way you guys talk about it..and from the wonderful photo you fellas kick out..I wouldn't mind trying my hand at it sometimes. I mean..I'm up and down the east coast several times a week and missing MUCH.. What do ya think? |
|
|
| (416900) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 16:10:53 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by G1Ravage on Mon Apr 16 03:11:04 2007. I see they didn't programe the metrocard walking transfer message.That SHOULD BE CLEARLY stated. |
|
|
| (416905) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Apr 17 16:24:05 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 16:06:08 2007. Wasn't it you that told me recently that you had no interest in taking photos at the places you drive to for work after I suggested that maybe you'd want to? |
|
|
| (416913) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Tue Apr 17 16:51:28 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Looking at the money train photo, they should use that for the purpose. |
|
|
| (416921) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Apr 17 17:20:26 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by G1Ravage on Tue Apr 17 02:51:56 2007. I'm wondering the same thing. I'm a bit skeptical of the claim that they would create a full announcement program for a route that doesn't exist. Perhaps after Lexington Avenue it "turns off" so to speak and just displays a final destination. It seems more logical to me to program in the SAS once it is actually well under construction.Then again, WMATA trains have had the ability to show DULLES on their destination signs since the system opened in 1976... |
|
|
| (416938) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 18:17:33 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Apr 17 16:24:05 2007. People can change their minds..and if I have the time..[like today]..and equipment..I might just do so.No big deal. Could use some pointers,though. Since you are one of the better photogs..what would You suggest..becides "the open road"? |
|
|
| (416943) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Apr 17 18:27:28 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 18:17:33 2007. I don't know what you are interested in. Just go take photos of whatever interests you. |
|
|
| (416950) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by error46146 on Tue Apr 17 18:48:50 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. I like the pic of the red train with the air conditioners sticking out of it, nice pics! |
|
|
| (416960) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 19:10:49 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Nice to see the cars assigned to the Eastern Division coming in.8325-8328..just happens to part of them. |
|
|
| (416970) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 19:27:14 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by error46146 on Tue Apr 17 18:48:50 2007. I gather you've never been on that type of train? |
|
|
| (416973) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Apr 17 19:29:18 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Edwards! on Tue Apr 17 19:10:49 2007. Why is it nice? It's awful. |
|
|
| (416985) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Q35 Limited on Tue Apr 17 19:49:11 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Apr 17 19:29:18 2007. I thought the R42's were horrible? |
|
|
| (416993) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by error46146 on Tue Apr 17 19:58:19 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Q35 Limited on Tue Apr 17 19:49:11 2007. No, the R42's are excellent subway cars, and it is a shame the MTA is getting rid of them.Not as excellent as the R32 and R40 of course but they're still on my good list |
|
|
| (416996) | |
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Apr 17 20:02:31 2007, in response to Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by error46146 on Tue Apr 17 19:58:19 2007. Not the Coney Island rebuilds. The Morrison Knudson rebuilds, yes, they are pretty good subway cars. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
