|
|
| Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) (416818) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: PHOTOS: This ''TWO'' Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly) |
|
|
Posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Tue Apr 17 11:39:55 2007, in response to PHOTOS: This "TWO" Weeks In Transit, Including Rodeo Shots (Not 56K Friendly), posted by Élément Dramatique on Sun Apr 15 19:18:15 2007. Excellent pics Trevor. 2 corrections:1. R36 WF is 9564 and not 9542. 9542 is an R36 ML-its whereabouts are unknown. 2. R77 901 does have a red X on it. Some of these cars look awesome while others are just sitting there collecting rot. 9564 I believe will be scrapped and cut up. It looks absolutely horrendous. Not sure why 9074 was linked to it? IMO, 9564/9565 should've been reefed and another pair should've been put in their place at the time of the farewell. It should've been either 9588 or 9595 leading and not 9564. Both were in far much better shape than 9564/9565 was in. What happened to R36 WF #9565? Where is it currently? Was it cut up for scrap? Will any of these other cars ever be operated again for future fantrips? I.E. R6 1000? R16 6305? R16 6339? My favorite pic overall was R160A #8325. |
|
|
|