Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff (1164230) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 1 of 3 |
(1164230) | |
Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sun Jul 1 03:31:21 2012 |
|
(1164243) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Sun Jul 1 08:13:10 2012, in response to Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Jul 1 03:31:21 2012. And the obligary goo is there as well.Last time I checked, Times Square wasn't located under the water table. What's the excuse for the leaks now? |
|
(1164334) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 1 21:04:04 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Jul 1 08:13:10 2012. Water seepage is inevitable when you are underground. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1164343) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Sun Jul 1 21:13:26 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 1 21:04:04 2012. Especially from neglected old sewer or water lines. |
|
(1164344) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Sun Jul 1 21:13:38 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 1 21:04:04 2012. No. With enough time and money and skill, it can be highly minimized. |
|
(1164348) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Sun Jul 1 21:35:12 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by TERRapin station on Sun Jul 1 21:13:38 2012. SUBWAYMAN: Water seepage is inevitable when you are underground.BREE-ANNE: No. With enough time and money and skill, it can be highly minimized. ANOTHER worthless, word humping post? INEVITABLEY MINIMIZED STILL results in water seepage! Put the keyboard away, and go play Daddy or something.... STILL LOL@BREES SEEPAGE ISSUES |
|
(1164368) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 01:14:32 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Sun Jul 1 21:35:12 2012. Pwned! |
|
(1164371) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Mon Jul 2 01:48:23 2012, in response to Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Jul 1 03:31:21 2012. Poppycock! |
|
(1164372) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Mon Jul 2 01:55:43 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 01:14:32 2012. LOL!!!!!+1 |
|
(1164387) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Mon Jul 2 07:36:57 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Jul 2 01:14:32 2012. Not at all, since you were obviously referring to the type of seepage that is visible and damaging. By highly minimizing it, it will no longer be visible or damaging. So like I ALREADY SAID, you are wrong. |
|
(1164395) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 09:01:55 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by TERRapin station on Mon Jul 2 07:36:57 2012. By highly minimizing it, it will no longer be visible or damaging. So like I ALREADY SAID, you are wrong.HIGHLY MINIMIZING merely allows it to develop at a slower rate. It will STILL be damaging and there you go OBVIOUSLY KNOWING what SUBWAYMAN was thinking when he posted. Has your clairvoyance (you do seem to think you Know It All) helped with such mundane things as MegaMillions or anything? STILL LOL@POMPOUS BREE |
|
(1164396) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 09:10:18 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 09:01:55 2012. "Water finds a way"...Plumbing 102.... |
|
(1164397) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 09:24:04 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by TERRapin station on Mon Jul 2 07:36:57 2012. Minimizing the seepage does not elminate the leak.Example: If your faucet runs water, you shut if off to avoid the water running all day. However, when you turn it off and your facuet still has a drip - - you STILL HAVE A LEAK. |
|
(1164398) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 09:28:56 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 09:24:04 2012. Pwnd again... |
|
(1164401) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:30:54 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 09:01:55 2012. Not at all, since you were obviously referring to the type of seepage that is visible and damaging. By highly minimizing it, it will no longer be visible or damaging. So like I ALREADY SAID, you are wrong. |
|
(1164402) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:31:00 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 09:24:04 2012. Not at all, since you were obviously referring to the type of seepage that is visible and damaging. By highly minimizing it, it will no longer be visible or damaging. So like I ALREADY SAID, you are wrong. |
|
(1164404) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 09:35:22 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 09:10:18 2012. Bump for water finding a way.. |
|
(1164405) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:45:19 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 09:01:55 2012. More specifically, no, if it is minimized enough, i.e. "highly minimized", then it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late. |
|
(1164406) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:46:04 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 09:24:04 2012. I have no idea what you are talking about since that's not what the rest of us are talking about. |
|
(1164413) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:17:49 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:45:19 2012. damaging relative to the type of damageAre you THAT much of a MORON? What part of SEEPAGE and DAMAGE don't you freaking understand? MINIMIZING is in NO WAY CLOSE to the word needed - WATER PROOFING is the proper word, MORON! Stop word humping and understand THIS: NO ONE mentioned ANY degree of damage! All that was spoken about was SEEPAGE and DAMAGE don't you freaking understand, yet? Whenever you have SEEPAGE you WILL end up with DAMAGE! It is merely a matter of time. STILL LOL@BONE HEADED WORD HUMPING BREE |
|
(1164414) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:20:28 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 09:46:04 2012. I have no idea what you are talking about since that's not what the rest of us are talking about.??? You're kidding, right? You can't connect the dots? Get a sharper crayon! STILL LOL@CRAYON WIELDING BREE-ANNE |
|
(1164415) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 11:22:39 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:20:28 2012. Look at the replies If you ask me wifey chimed in using his handle. They have played this game before.... |
|
(1164416) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:25:39 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:17:49 2012. Oh, wait. I forgot. STANTEC had a hand in this project, didn't they? No wonder it's leaking like a sieve!And BREE, trying to be nice to a former master, will say ANYTHING to lessen the damage! STILL LOL@BREE-LESS STANTEC |
|
(1164417) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:27:28 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 11:22:39 2012. Cool! We get to bitchslap more than one! Add another member of the Sisterhood and it will be Three Stooges time, again!STILL LOL@BREE AND THE PUPPIES |
|
(1164418) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 11:51:07 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:17:49 2012. No, if it is minimized enough, i.e. "highly minimized", then it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late. |
|
(1164420) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Gamera on Mon Jul 2 11:55:51 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:25:39 2012. STANTEC had a hand in this project, didn't they? No wonder it's leaking like a sieve!Maybe HEwas the engineer who said waterproofing was not neededROTFLMAO!!! |
|
(1164421) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 12:03:39 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Gamera on Mon Jul 2 11:55:51 2012. Yup and she neglected to MINIMIZE her position and STANTEC let her GO! Poor BREE-ANNE!STILL LOL@BREE'S EMPLOYMENT WOES |
|
(1164422) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 12:07:22 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 11:51:07 2012. No, if it is minimized enough, i.e. "highly minimized", then it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late.No wonder you hate buses! You OBVIOUSLY MISSED THE BUS ON THIS ONE! NO ONE mentioned ANY degree of damage! All that was spoken about was SEEPAGE and DAMAGE, don't you freaking understand, yet? Whenever you have SEEPAGE you WILL end up with DAMAGE! It is merely a matter of time. STILL LOL@BONE HEADED WORD HUMPING BREE |
|
(1164423) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 12:23:59 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 12:07:22 2012. Would that be anything like less turtle=less word humping? |
|
(1164424) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 12:24:05 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 12:07:22 2012. You're an idiot. I AM THE ONE who brought up damage! |
|
(1164426) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 12:32:46 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 12:23:59 2012. Water finds a way bump.... |
|
(1164428) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jul 2 12:49:26 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 12:24:05 2012. Unless you eradicate the seepage completely it will still cause damage. The damage may be less than what it was before efforts were made to minimize it, but it still causes damage unless you stop the cause |
|
(1164429) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jul 2 12:51:33 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 12:24:05 2012. Are you mental???? You have severe reading comprehension issues if you can't understand the context in which the words "seepage" and "damage" are being used in this thread. "Minimizing" seepage will nor prevent damage, only extend the time frame over which such damage occurs. You are a moronic, word-humping troll...oh, and you are completelyWRONG! |
|
(1164431) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:04:32 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jul 2 12:49:26 2012. Obviously the "highly minimizing the water seepage" would involve waterproofing.You can't "stop" the water table. You also can't effectively "stop" water from entering a large area of ground, at least relative to how effectively you can waterproof an underground structure. That's why you have water proofing. |
|
(1164432) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:05:09 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jul 2 12:51:33 2012. You're an idiot. I AM THE ONE who brought up damage! |
|
(1164433) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jul 2 13:13:59 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:05:09 2012. Actually, Turtlebrain, it was Mitch45 who first mentioned damage, in the second post of this thread. Go take your psychotropic meds. You're overdue. |
|
(1164435) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:38:12 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jul 2 13:13:59 2012. He said leaks, not damage. You can have a leak and not have damage. |
|
(1164437) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Mon Jul 2 13:43:17 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 12:03:39 2012. You are too much!!!!! |
|
(1164438) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 13:47:11 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 11:51:07 2012. No, if it is minimized enough, i.e. "highly minimized", then it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late.Minimized is a qualitative term which is so broad, no two people have the same benchmark as to what they think is "minimized" in terms of damage. Really, we are going back and forth on this issue, how can you "minimize" a leak to the point where "it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late" as you posted? In an apartment or co-op where there is a dwelling above you, there is a heavy water leak which damages the ceiling. Maintenance personnel come in to your apartment and the apartment above you to fix the leak. The leak is not wholly stopped but "minimized" instead, then another crew comes in to repair the hole in your ceiling (caused by the leak). You now have a brand new ceiling in the area where the leak happened. Yes the leak in minimized but there is a drip. The drip causes water accumulation (especially where it is in an area where water cannot evaporate) and creates visible water seepage through the same ceiling which was repaired earlier. Over time (maybe a couple of years), the water accumulation causes a portion of your ceiling to come again because the leak was not fixed but minimized. So, now what do you have to say about that? |
|
(1164439) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 13:52:28 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:38:12 2012. It depends on where the leak goes to - - it the leak affects the foundation or structure then you have seepage.On the SAF and my Whitehall threads, we were talking how the water leaks are causing damage to the the stations. |
|
(1164440) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 13:56:00 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:04:32 2012. Obviously the "highly minimizing the water seepage" would involve waterproofing.But, IDIOT WONDER you never (until now, where you have been PWN3D about it, I might add) stated ANYTHING about waterproofing! "highly minimizing the water seepage" and "waterproofing" are 2 (two) TOTALLY seperate things! Putting a layer of stone between the concrete and the dirt foundation would "highly minimize" seepage where a rubber membrane on the same concrete would be "waterproofing". You can't "stop" the water table. You also can't effectively "stop" water from entering a large area of ground, at least relative to how effectively you can waterproof an underground structure. That's why you have water proofing. WTF? Wouldn't waterproofing an underground structure effectively "stop" water from entering a large area of ground? You might want to "Google" World Trade Center Bathtub to get some information on how to effectively "stop" water from entering a large area of ground. I need to ask this: in a past life, were you ever a dog that continually chased it's own tail? I think that might have carried over into THIS life! STILL LOL@BREE AND HER TAIL CHASING WORD HUMPING WAYS |
|
(1164441) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 14:01:07 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 13:47:11 2012. Here it comes: BREE is going to state that we are MORONs because NO ONE is talking about the subway stations CEILINGS!!!STILL LOL@BREE AND HER SEEPAGE ISSUES |
|
(1164444) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Mon Jul 2 14:10:13 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 14:01:07 2012. Seepage issues? |
|
(1164445) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 14:11:13 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 13:52:28 2012. It depends on where the leak goes to Which is why I said "You can have a leak and not have damage." On the SAF and my Whitehall threads, we were talking how the water leaks are causing damage to the the stations. In this thread, Mitch just asked about leaks. |
|
(1164446) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Mon Jul 2 14:11:21 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 11:27:28 2012. Well, in a few years, the older kid will be old enough to go online... :) |
|
(1164447) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 14:13:58 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 13:47:11 2012. Really, we are going back and forth on this issue, how can you "minimize" a leak to the point where "it will not be damaging relative to the type of damage that is being discussed on this forum as of late" as you posted? Waterproofing, along with both regularly scheduled and on-demand cleaning programs? |
|
(1164448) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 14:20:25 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 14:13:58 2012. Waterproofing, along with both regularly scheduled and on-demand cleaning programs?Oh, so NOW you get it! Waterproofing does seem to be the correct usage and the proper word. Having a bad few days, are you? I don't remember you being on the receiving end of this much PWN3AGE in a LOOOONNNNG time! But, I am..... STILL LOL@PWN3D BREE AND HER SEEPAGE |
|
(1164449) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Jul 2 14:21:44 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 14:20:25 2012. But wait, he ended his response with a question mark - - so he is taking an educated guess. |
|
(1164451) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jul 2 14:36:20 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 2 09:35:22 2012. Maybe we're no longer word-humping about "water" seepage. It could be that leakage from a condom could lead to other visible & long term damage. |
|
(1164453) | |
Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jul 2 14:48:13 2012, in response to Re: Service cuts restored: (W) back, 42nd Street Shuttle to close -- Proff, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jul 2 13:38:12 2012. You mean the ”obligatory goo” Mitch mentions isn't damage? Really? |
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |