|
|
| Re: 4th Ave. as a G terminal after the viaduct construction? (805111) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 4th Ave. as a G terminal after the viaduct construction? |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Jul 5 16:30:35 2009, in response to Re: 4th Ave. as a G terminal after the viaduct construction?, posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Jul 5 15:12:40 2009. Why should the C go down to Church? Whats the point? Who does it benefit? The MTA will counter that the transfer at Jay Street makes such a move un-necessary. The V wouldn't go full time either under that, simply because the demand isn't enough. If the C could handle it now in its current operations, the need for the V to run 24/7 wouldn't be necessary. It's current time of operation is enough to run to Euclid. While you do offer good options, however you're just offering a one seat ride over a transfer. I don't see enough people transferring at West 4th Street to make your idea worthwhile over the current configuration. Then again I sound like a NIMBY, I would love to see it tried at least maybe you're 100% right. |
|
|
|