|
|
| Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (729903) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Jan 5 03:37:07 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jan 4 15:07:15 2009. No union labor restrictions and rules back then, I guess!The Davis-Bacon Act governing prevailing wages and union rules was already in effect when that portion of the IND was under construction. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|