Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (729542)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?

Posted by olivermuc on Sun Jan 4 12:34:19 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Jan 4 12:25:12 2009. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d You're right, the F terminated at Parsons Blvd until 1950. 1948 route information

Responses

• Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - randyo - Sun Jan 4 17:45:44 2009
  • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Steve B-8AVEXP - Sun Jan 4 21:45:28 2009
    • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - randyo - Sun Jan 4 21:51:27 2009
      • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - RonInBayside - Sun Jan 4 21:53:19 2009
        • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - randyo - Sun Jan 4 21:55:11 2009
      • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Jan 5 11:48:08 2009
        • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - randyo - Mon Jan 5 15:54:05 2009
          • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - 33rd Street - Mon Jan 5 16:56:31 2009
          • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Chris R16/R2730 - Tue Jan 6 19:28:34 2009
            • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Kew Gardens Teleport - Tue Jan 6 19:37:44 2009
            • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Steve B-8AVEXP - Wed Jan 7 22:05:11 2009
          • Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? - Edwards! - Wed Jan 7 12:43:46 2009

Post a New Response