|
|
| Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (729831) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:53:19 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by randyo on Sun Jan 4 21:51:27 2009. "What is interesting is that both befor and after 179 opened, F trains di not stop at 169 St during rush hours."Meaning the F turned short of 169 St. |
|
|
|