Re: R1/9 acceleration (Re: What is the mechanical condition of the Low V?) (664079)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: R1/9 acceleration (Re: What is the mechanical condition of the Low V?)

Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Aug 9 22:54:44 2008, in response to Re: R1/9 acceleration (Re: What is the mechanical condition of the Low V?), posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Sat Aug 9 20:15:16 2008. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Switch is one point of power only, car does not accelerate. Series hooks the motors in series, each motor gets 300 volts. Each point removes resistance until none is present, Parallel connects 600 volts to each motor and inserts full resistance again, each point removes resistance until Full Parallel is reached. Motor control can be manual, as on a streetcar or or automatic like a subway or elevated train.

Responses

• Re: R1/9 acceleration (Re: What is the mechanical condition of the Low V?) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sat Aug 9 22:57:46 2008
  • Re: R1/9 acceleration (Re: What is the mechanical condition of the Low V?) - Dan Lawrence - Sun Aug 10 11:49:09 2008
    • Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sun Aug 10 12:06:09 2008
      • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - Chris R16/R2730 - Sun Aug 10 12:30:39 2008
        • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sun Aug 10 12:54:53 2008
          • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - Hank Eisenstein - Sun Aug 10 14:29:44 2008
            • WMATA? Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - trainsarefun - Sun Aug 10 14:42:01 2008
              • Re: WMATA? Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sun Aug 10 17:18:59 2008
        • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - trainsarefun - Sun Aug 10 13:24:04 2008
          • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - Chris R16/R2730 - Sun Aug 10 13:27:16 2008
            • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - trainsarefun - Sun Aug 10 13:40:55 2008
              • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sun Aug 10 13:52:05 2008
      • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Sun Aug 10 13:10:52 2008
      • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - Jeff H. - Mon Aug 11 03:20:37 2008
        • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - JournalSquare-K-Car - Mon Aug 11 09:42:27 2008
        • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - RonInBayside - Mon Aug 11 11:00:28 2008
          • Re: Why isn't Alternating Currentu used to power Subways? (was R1/9 acceleration) - Dan Lawrence - Mon Aug 11 12:52:42 2008

Post a New Response