|
|
| Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson (620125) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue May 20 15:24:28 2008, in response to Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson, posted by 156n3rd on Sun May 18 13:05:03 2008. I see you failed to be specific and instead resorted to immature rhetoric. If you don't like being asked questions when you come out with statements that beg questions (especially fair questions that have no malice in them whatsoever), then refrain from posting such statements."Unattractive interiors"? Great, then throw out cars that are a mere 22 years old on that basis (the PA-4s)? Please don't claim that such a response is either grown-up or kind. I wasn't aware that designing "experimental cars" (which is a financial risk) is a sign of viability for a company? Besides, on what basis is the PA-1 judged non-experimental when compared with the "black cars" or K-cars? PA-1 and PA-2 are remarkable successes, if their 42- to 43-year lifespan is any judge of same. Your unrelated call to bring back the 3rd Avenue El I am in sympathy with, at least. |
|
|
|