|Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O) (533476)|
|Home > SubChat|
Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O)
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Dec 14 13:39:46 2007, in response to Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Dec 14 13:25:59 2007.Cops are permitted discretion.
Thank you, as that is not what you said previously.
You can believe whatever you wish - others can tell you that they WERE required to show ID, and in a number of cases, it WAS written down.
Again, thank you, this is as I stated it in post you are responding to. Just because the police say you have to show ID and then write it down, doesn't mean THEY HAVE TO OR THAT DHS TOLD THEM THEY HAVE TO! You said otherwise! But you just reversed opinion by saying that cops have discretion.
But I *can* tell you this ... refusing to cooperate and sitting there citing your "rights" can pretty much guarantee a report.
That has nothing to do with this. We're discussing what the cops HAVE to do and/or what DHS says they HAVE TO DO, not what the cops may do contrary to the law.
Anything else is irrelevant. Nilet's issue is NOT actually with the T/O, it goes much further up the chain or that T/O would have just moved the train and to HELL with whatever was going on outside their cab. Period.
I don't know what you are talking about, but if you read back up this subthread, we are discussing why she told him that photography was not allowed when he stepped onboard the train after filming it after it stopped to make the station stop. I believe that was the first thing she did. We are also discussing why she later used the word "terrorist" in reference to him. It'd be pretty funny if all this time you were talking about something else.