Home  Maps  About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O)

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Dec 14 13:02:12 2007, in response to Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O), posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Dec 14 12:24:06 2007.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No need to email you - MY "guess" is that the T/O didn't want to piss of the geese by doing what they were told to do in the event a photog failed to "cease and desist" ... namely taking the train out of service, inconveniencing the customers and having to spend hellweek amongst the beakies. She apparently contacted command, didn't GET a response, felt endangered based upon her training, got NO support as expected and was left alone to deal with something that she never expected to be left to deal with alone. You're married, right?

My wife is a stronger old bird than I am and often takes charge herself without MY need to get involved in it. In fact, it's FUN to let her rip someone a new sphincter. Heh. She ENJOYS doing that so I stand aside. Some wimmen aren't so bold. I won't go into the personalities, don't KNOW the person. But if she had the "history" you claim, then she would have been taken down long ago for something else. No, the way *I* take it, given civil service and the antigravity rules of conduct as an employee, she obviously didn't know about 1059c, and it's not her job to care in all sincerity. HER job as she reacted was "suspicious activity" even if poorly defined. She GOT on the radio, requested assistance, was left to twist in the wind doing what she was TOLD to do, knew what she was TOLD to do in such an event and flipped out PERHAPS.

We can discuss this at greater length once you've BEEN a government employee, subject to the silliness of "silly service" ... had ANYTHING gone wrong, SHE would have been hung out to dry. I once again INSIST that the training was defective or she would have KNOWN better, and the fact that her supervision FAILED to back her up points to the ACTUAL problem here ... no other answer (as far as hourlies are concerned) is valid.

HOPEFULLY, anyone who is with the show can explain this to you otherwise since I'm "a liar" in your eyes. But what happened here is MIGHTY plain and VERY clear cut to ME as someone who actually DID the job, and KNOWS how paranoid the republican world is. :(

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]